Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Exposure,hazard,vulnerability – insurance risk management with and without climate change Mr. Andrew Mitchell 1 ©Copyright 2007 Willis Limited all rights reserved. exposure, hazard, vulnerability – insurance risk management with and without climate change Andrew Mitchell Willis Analytics Climate Change: Impacts on the Caribbean Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre University of the West Indies 16 June 2007 insurance risk identification and quantification • the cost-benefit of insurance - smoothing, pooling, diversifying • experience-based rating - generalised linear models • poor identification of extremes - no geography, no science, no engineering • reinsurance provides cover for catastrophe event accumulations of loss • cat modelling introduced to reinsurance sector in early 1990s • discipline this created is as important as the numbers in output • cat modelling has become a pre-requisite for new capital, esp Bermuda • provided demonstrable stability - far fewer failures in 2000-2005 vs 1990-1995 • cat modelling is cross-disciplinary and multi-component • stochastic event sets • probabilistic treatment of primary and secondary uncertainty 3 catastrophe loss models: structure HAZARD VULNERABILITY FINANCIAL • event generation • mean damage ratios • local intensity calculation • building inventory • applying insurance terms and conditions location details policy conditions EXPOSURE • sums insured • risk type • coverage type 4 catastrophe loss models: output Island Parish Occupancy Construction Height Yearbuilt Return Period 1000 750 500 250 200 100 50 25 10 5 Jamaica St. James Temporary Lodging Unknown Unknown Unknown Occupancy only 61.36% 56.49% 49.48% 37.50% 33.74% 22.59% 12.72% 5.00% 0.23% 0.00% Jamaica St. James Temporary Lodging Reinforced Concrete Unknown Unknown + Construction 57.41% 52.72% 46.06% 34.82% 31.29% 20.84% 11.58% 4.40% 0.17% 0.00% Jamaica St. James Temporary Lodging Reinforced Concrete 4 stories Unknown + Height 46.01% 41.26% 34.65% 23.87% 20.60% 11.40% 4.39% 0.69% 0.00% 0.00% Jamaica St. James Temporary Lodging Reinforced Concrete 4 stories 2006 + Year Built 44.17% 39.53% 33.11% 22.64% 19.47% 10.60% 3.95% 0.57% 0.00% 0.00% 80% Occupancy only + Construction + Height + Year Built 70% gross loss OEP as % of insured value 60% model sensitivity analysis RMS RiskLink v6.0 hurricane EP curve primary modifier variations 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 return period (year) 5 600 700 800 900 1,000 exposure: US land-falling hurricane losses – actual source: Normalized Hurricane Damages in the United States: 1900-2005 Pielke et al Natural Hazards Review (submitted) 6 exposure: US land-falling hurricane losses – revalued source: Normalized Hurricane Damages in the United States: 1900-2005 Pielke et al Natural Hazards Review (submitted) 7 exposure: growth and data capture • population growth • growth in property values • growth of urban concentrations • settlement and development in exposed regions • rise in standard of living • increased international trade - marine cargo exposure • increased insurance penetration • increased correlation means exposure to cat events rises faster than income base • insurance exposure data: • capture and reporting limited by legacy systems • quality and type has not been standardised • trans- and multi-national policies mean location identification is confused • ? largest source of error in modelling 8 hazard: source of losses hurricane earthquake hurricane earthquake 9 hazard: relative size of losses hurricane earthquake RMS v6.0 Jamaica earthquake - buildings only 25.00% 25.00% 20.00% 20.00% OEP gross loss as % of total insured value OEP gross loss as % of total insured value RMS v6.0 Jamaica hurricane (long-term historical event set) - buildings only 15.00% 10.00% IED WS (LT) 50:50 Res:Com WS (LT) 20:80 Res:Com WS (LT) 20:60:20 Res:Com:Hotel WS (LT) 5.00% 15.00% 10.00% IED EQ 50:50 Res:Com EQ 20:80 Res:Com EQ 20:60:20 Res:Com:Hotel EQ 5.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0 1,000 100 200 300 400 500 600 return period (years) return period (years) other types of hazard: other classes of business: • fire • liability • theft • health • explosion • aerospace • terrorism • marine • volcanic eruption • credit • finex 10 700 800 900 1,000 hazard: complications • secondary hazards not modelled - landslip, fire following earthquake • other non-modelled loss contributors - economic loss, vulnerability factors • impact of climate change will vary geographically and over time • existing hazards change, new hazards emerge • impact on frequency and severity unclear • data too limited: • current trends vs natural variability • local uncertainty - confused by feedback systems • downscaling and regional modelling not ready • climate change - just another source of uncertainty? 11 vulnerability: other components of insurance loss • mean damage ratios • engineering - design and construction components • calibrated by loss and claims experience • non-linear factors • economic demand surge • claims inflation - fraud, propensity to claim • business interruption • loss adjusters expenses • claims management strategy • approved suppliers, approved repairers • regional restrictions • saturation point unclear • poor repair quality vs retro-fitting • natural increase in vulnerability and inter-dependence of systems • political interference 12 insurance: risk management and climate change • growing connection between insurance and academia • contextual information vs “plug-in” data • the flat earth has returned - data and modelling required for everywhere • solvency and regulation - risk-based capital • underwriting, reserving, credit, operational, liquidity, investment • insurance as economic not social function • reduction in insurance relief relative to economic losses • risk appetite to meet return-on-capital targets • interface between insurance and public policy • non-stationarity means limited insurance adaptation is possible • insurance cannot provide cover for the predictable 13