Download PowerPoint-Präsentation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia, lookup

Life-cycle assessment wikipedia, lookup

Rebound effect (conservation) wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
Future Design of Economic
Instruments for Fair Energy
Pricing
Kai Schlegelmilch*
Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation
and Nuclear Safety, Berlin/Germany
EP – GLOBE, NEEDS Forum 1: Accepting the Real Price for
Sustainable Energy, Belgian Parliament, Brussels 24th May 2005
* Though I normally represent government positions, this presentation is
made on my personal capacity.
Examples for Economic
Instruments
Present:
• Liability/Guarantee/Insurance Obligations
• Taxes and Charges
• Emissions Trading
Future:
• Liabilities for large scale damages such as
climate change
• Emissions Trading for SME/Transport/Private
Households
• Road Pricing for private cars
• Congestion Charge/City Toll
Requirements/Criteria for
Fair Energy Pricing
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Polluter Pays/Resource User Principle
competivity and equity concerns
Predictability
Good Rationale
Transparency i.a. of revenue use
Monitoring
Reporting
Task/Sector Sharing of Instruments
Liability/Guarantee/Insurance
Obligations
• Liabilities for large scale damages such
as climate change
• Full liability for all energy sources
• Set up reporting system on liability
schemes and how they affect
investment decisions (or how their nonexistence does so)
• Refer to insurance fees of the private
sector which are differentiated
according to risks
Taxes and Charges I
• Demonstrate tax relation to environmental
aspects (CO2, energy, other pollutants)
• Take competitiveness and equity concerns
into account
• Choose mid-term tax approach (e.g. UK-fuel
duty escalator-1993-2000, D-ETR-1999-2003, SETR-2000-2010)
• Transparency and Monitoring of Impacts and
Revenue Use by Reporting System
Taxes and Charges II
• Use of Revenues can be shown more clearly by provision on
the pay slip – as often not understood if used for labour cost
reduction
• Earmark smaller parts for environmental purposes or name
Ecological Tax Reform (ETR) differently
• Fiscal Driver may be required to ensure introduction and
continuation
• However, often schizophrenic attitude: Though market-based
instruments are introduced people prefer to ask the “good”
government when it comes to revenue spending
• People often dislike being “forced” to change behaviour
Emissions Trading
• Possibly extend Emissions Trading to
SME/Transport/Private – or communicate the
role of instrumental task sharing between
taxes and emissions trading for different
sectors like private households and transport
• Free allocation is economically not the best,
but may be required for competivity and equity
concerns
• Monitoring and Reporting is required which is
a good element
Road Pricing/Congestion
Charge/City Toll
• Allow for differentiation according to
environmental pollution//Euro norms/fuel
consumption
• Gain acceptance by first e.g. including the
haulier sector
• Transparency i.a. of revenue use by new
government, used for transport infrastructure
• Monitor progress and communicate benefits to
the society and various stakeholders
Conclusions
• Future Design of Economic Instruments
for Fair Energy Pricing may take
different forms; but it appears that
transparency (internalisation of external
costs), monitoring and thus reporting
are essential for better acceptance
building
Thank you very much for your
attention!
Contact:
• [email protected]
• Tel.: +49-1888-305-3664
• Fax: +49-1888-305-2349
• http://www.bmu.de
• http://www.bmu.de/oekologische-finanzreform
(information in D, E, FR, ESP)