Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Fiber architecture • Quantification of muscle structure • Relationship to functional capacity – Muscle as one big sarcomere – Independent fibers/fascicles Terminology • Attachments – Origin – Insertion • Muscle belly – Aponeurosis (internal tendon) – Fascicle (Perimysium) – Compartment – Pennation Connective tissue layers • Endomysium • Perimysium • Epimysium Purslow & Trotter 1994 Muscles are 3-D structures Structural definition • Qualitative – Epimysium – Discrete tendon • Insertion (gastroc) • Origin (extensor digiti longus) – Easy to separate • Electrophysiological – Common nerve – Common reflex 3-D structures • • • • Curved (centroid) paths Curved fiber paths Distributed attachments Varying fascicle length Categorizing • Pennation – Longitudinal – Unipennate – Bipennate – Multipennate • Approximation – Fascicle length – Force capacity Historical • Stensen (1660) • Borelli (1680) • Gosch (1880) Idealized muscles • • • • • Muscle mass (M) Muscle length (Lm) Fascicle length (Lf) Pennation angle (q) “Physiological” cross sectional area (PCSA) The Gans & Bock Model • Vastus Intermedius – Identical facsicles – Originate directly from bone – Insert into tendon that lies parallel to bone • Geometrical constraints – Tendon moves parallel to bone – Constant volume – 2-D approximation • No change “into the paper” • Constant area Force capacity d • Physiological cross-sectional area – Sum fascicles perpendicular to axis – Not measurable – Fm = Ts * PCSA b • Prism approximation – Volume = b*d – B sin(q) = V/Lf – PCSA = V/ Lf = M/r/Lf • Project force to tendon – Ft = Fm cos(q) = Ts*M/r/Lf * cos(q) q Lf Fm PCSA Ft Test PCSA • Spector & al., 1980 – Cat soleus and medial gastrocnemius • Powell & al., 1984 Powell – Guinnea pig: 8 calf muscles Soleus MG 130% 41% 1.5 6% 0.7% 1.0 0.5 0.0 Po Po/g Po/pcsa Po/Ft Predicted Ft (o) Relative measure 2.0 Predicted PCSA (●) Spector 2.5 Measured force Are pennate muscles strong? • Ft = Ts*M/r/Lf * cos(q) • cos(q) is always ≤1 • Ft ≤ F m – Fiber packing – Series sarcomeres (A=1, F=1) – Parallel sarcomeres (A=6, F=6) – Pennate sarcomeres (A = 6, F=5.2) Length change d • Fiber shortens from ff1 – Rotates from q q1 – b*d constant – b*f*sin(q) = b*f1*sin(q1) – h = f*cos(q)-f1*cos(q1) f1 b h q • Fractional shortening in muscle is q1 greater than the fractional shortening f of fascicles – If the fascicles rotate much – eg: 15° fibers, fascicle shorten 25%muscle 27% Operating range • Muscle can shorten ~50% (Weber, 1850) – Operating range proportional to length – Spasticity – Reduced mobility (Crawford, 1954) • Length-tension relationship – Useful range strongly dependent on Lo – Pennate fibers shorten less than their muscle Velocity • Force-velocity relationship – Shortening muscle produces less force – Power = force * speed – Acceleration • Architecture and biochemistry influence Vmax – Fiber type: 2x – Fiber length: 12x Other Geometries • Point origin, point insertion • Elastic aponeurosis – Increase length with force Cos(a-q) Cos(q) – Vm = Va + Vf Cos(a) Cos(a) • Multipennate muscles Other subdivisions • Multiple bellies – Digit flexors/extensors – Biceps/Triceps – Multiple discrete attachments • Compartments – Most “large” muscles – Internal connective tissue – Internal nerve branches Multiple bellies • Rat EDL – 4 insertion tendons – 2 nerve branches • Glycogen depletion – Discrete branch territories – Mixing at ventral root Balice-Gordon & Thompson 1988 Compartments • Cat lateral gastrocnemius – Dense internal connective tissue – Surface texture – Internal nerve branches English & Ledbetter, 1982 LG Compartments • Motor unit – Axon+innervated fibers – Constrained to compartment English & Weeks, 1984 Neural view • Does NS use the same divisions as anatomists? • Careful training can control single motoneuron • Behavioral recruitment spans muscles – Mechanical tuning – Training Anatomical vs neural division • Muscle – Easily separated – Separately innervated • Multi-belly – Partly separable – Slight overlap of nerve territories • Compartment – Inseparable – Slight overlap of nerve territories Fibers and fascicles • Rodents – Fiber = fascicle – Easiest experimental model • Small animals – Fascicle 5-10 cm – Fiber 1-2 cm (conduction velocity ~2-5 m/s) Motor unit distribution • MU localized longitudinal Fibers innervated by single MN are near one MEP band Motor endplates in sternomanibularis Purslow & Trotter, 1994 Smits et al., 1994 3-D reconstruction • Relatively straight fibers • Taper-in, taper-out 1 mm Ounjian et al., 1991 Mechanical independence • Bag of spaghetti model – Independent muscle/belly/compartment/fiber – Little force sharing • Fiber composite model – Adjacent structures coupled elastically – Lateral force transmission Fiber level force transmission • Sybil Street, 1983 • Frog sartorius – All but one fiber removed from half muscle – Anchor remaining fiber ends – Anchor segment and “clot” – Same force “Belly” level force transmission • Huijing & al., 2002 • Rat EDL – Separate digit tendons – Cut one-by-one (TT) – Pull bellies apart (MT) – Little force change with tenotomy only Muscle level force transmission • Maas & al., 2001 • Rat TA and EDL – Separate control of muscle lengths – Measure both EDL origin&insert F – 10% EDL-TA trans Summary • • • • • Architectural quantification: M, Lm, Lf, q Estimates of force production: PCSA (Fm), Ft Simple models are “pretty good” Sub-muscular structures: compartments Neural structure is not the same as muscle structure