Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Social support Kristina Orth-Gomér Internal medicine Social medicine/Public health Karolinska institutet, Sthlm + Psykosomatisk medicin Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin A lonely man is a strong man Social support - definition • Social support is the resource provided by other people (S Cohen, L Syme 1985) • Social networks - structure • Social supports - function • Social relations may have negative and positive effects on health Social networks and health ”the patterns of prospective association between social integration (that is the number and frequency of social relationships and contacts) and mortality are remarkably similar, with some variations by race, sex and geographic locale.” House et al., Science, 1988 Age adjusted relative mortality risk (RR) low vs high social network index Alameda county (CA) Techumseh (MI) Evans county (GEO) whites blacks North Karelia (SF) Gothenburg (S) Swedish survey of living coditions men 2.44* 3.87* women 2.81* 1.97 1.83* 1.08 2.63* 4.00* 1.50* 1.07 1.59 1.92 1.50* House et al., Science, 1988 Swedish Survey of Living Conditions • • • • 17 400 men and women, age 15 to 65 Representative of the Swedish population Followed for 6 years Low Social network interaction predicted mortality in men of all ages • Excess risk 50%, controlling for other risk factors Men, aged 50, born in Göteborg • 741 men, born in 1933 • Followed for 6 years and 15 years • Attachment - close emotional ties • Social integration - help with appraisal and coping, tangible support, belonging Social inegration (AVSI) • How many people do you know? • How many people do you have regular contact with? • How many friends do you have who can come to visit any time? • How many people can you trust? • How many people can you ask for small favors? • How many people can you turn to in difficulties and expect real help? 6 and 15 year incidence by social integration % 14 14 12 10 9 8 6 6 5.7 4.5 4 1.59 2 0 low middel high 6 year incidence 15 year incidence Attachment (AVAT) • Is there anyone you can lean on? • Is there anyone who feels very close to you? • Is there anyone you can share happiness with, who would also feel happy ? • Is there anyone you can share most private feelings with ? • Is there anyone to hold and comfort you? • Do people really appreciate what you do for them? 6 and 15 year incidence by attachment % 14 13 12 10 8 8 6 6 year incidence 15 year incidence 5.8 3.5 4 2 0 low high Life style Controlling for life style Protective effects on CVD incidence social integration = .45 P=.014 attachment = . 58 P=.019 Rosengren A Wilhelmsen L Orth-Gomer K, 2003 Conclusions • Socially integrated men have half the risk of getting a myocardial infarction over 15 yrs • Attachment is also protective • Both effects are independent of other risk factors SUPERWOMAN The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study •Community based case-control study •All women aged 65 years or younger and hospitalized for acute AMI or unstable AP in Stockholm 1991-1994 (n=292) •Aged matched healthy control women, obtained from the census register of Stockholm (n=292) Orth-Gomér et al Circulation 1997 The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study The patients (n=292) were followed for a median of 5 years (3 to 6 years) Recurrent events included (n=81): cardiac death recurrent AMI revascularization procedures Attachment did not significantly affect prognosis in women. Are close emotional ties stressful rather than protective in women? Negative effects of social ties? Aim To evaluate the impact of stress from social relations on prognosis in women CHD patients - controlling for both disease severity, standard risk factors and work stress as measured at baseline. The Stockholm Marital Stress Scale Is the relationship with your spouse loving? Is the relationship with your spouse friendly? Is the relationship with your spouse routine-like ? Is the relationship with your spouse problematic? Do you engage in leisure activities together with your spouse? Do you have your own private life outside the relationship with your spouse? Is your spouse your closest confidant? Are there things you can’t talk openly about with each other? Have you had serious problems in the relationship with your spouse previously? Have you had serious problems in the relationship with your spouse currently? Have you had serious crises in your relationhip? Have you solved problems actively together? Do you have a sexual relationship with your spouse? Do you find the sexual relationship with your spouse satisfactory? Has your sexual relationship been affected by your heart disease? Has your sexual relationship ceased due to your heart disease? Marital & work stress and CHD Odds ratio: OR (95 % C.l.) Multivariate adjusted for: age, education, smoking, BMI, SBP, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL (in 5-year follow-up even for diabetes and left ventricular dysfunction) case-control study 5-year follow-up 10.2 (2.4; 23.6) 12 12 10 10 8 8 4.5 4.0 (2.5; 8.4) (1.8; 8.9) 6 4 2 5.7 (1.3; 24.3) 6 4 1 2 0 1 1.6 (0.8; 3.3) 2.9 (1.3; 6.5) 0 no stress marital stress work stress both no stress work stress marital stress both OR Depressive symptoms • • • • • • • • • Lack enthusiasm Poor appetite Feel lonely Feel bored Troubled sleep Cry easily Feel downhearted Low in energy Feel hopeless Pearlin, J Health Soc Behav 22:337-356 1981 Pathways for men Pathways for women Low SES Lack of social resources Emotional stress at work Inadequate reward/lack of control Emotional stress in family life anger hostility social isolation lack of attachment Depressed feelings hopelessness fatigue smoking habits excess alcohol consumption lack of physical exercise abdominal fat poor nutrition overweight/obesity lack of physical exercise cardiac arrythmia ventricular extrasystole ventricular fib elevated systolic blood pressure hypertension autonomic dysfunction poor vagal break autonomic dysfuntion HRV / SDNN hypercoagulability poor fibrinolysis disturbed metabolism low HDL/Apolipoprtein A BUFFER EFFECT STRESSOR DISEASE SOCIAL SUPPORT MAIN EFFECT SOCIAL ISOLATION DISEASE Progression of atherosclerosis by level of marital stress mean segment diameter change (mm) 0,14 0,12 0,1 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0 -0,02 -0,04 level of marital stress mild or absent moderate high Mediating Mechanisms Atherogenic Thrombotic Autonomic imbalance IS THE MEATABOLIC SYNDROME A MEDIATING MECHANISM? The metabolic syndrome • Defined according to WHO • Fasting plasma glucose > 7.0 mmol/l • Blood pressure > 160/90 mmHg • Central obesity ( w/h >.85 or BMI>30 kg/m2) • Fasting TG >1.7mmol/l or HDL<1.0 mmol/l Social support and the Metabolic Syndrome in middle-aged Swedish women 3,5 3 2,5 2 social support 1,5 1 0,5 0 low intermediate high Adjusted for age, menopausal status, educational level, smoking, exercise and alcohol consumption IS POOR SLEEP A MEDIATING MECHANISM? Methods • All female patients, aged 65 or under who were admitted with an acute coronary syndrome between 1991 and 1994 in Stockholm (n=292) • Diagnosis at baseline: Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=110) or unstable Angina Pectoris (n=182) • followed for five years for recurrent event • sleep complaints were measured at baseline using a standardized questionnaire • 283 women answered the sleep questionnaire The Sleep Questionnaire Have you perceived any of the following complaints during the last time? •Difficulties falling asleep •Disturbed/restless sleep •Premature awaking •Heavy snoring •Not feeling refreshed Sleep quality index Recurrent cardiac events and subjective sleep quality Sleep quality n Scores HR (95% CI)* p good 74 0-3 1 average 141 4-6 1.97 (1.01-3.85) .047 poor 68 7-9 2.55 (1.24-5.24) .011 *Hazards ratio, adjusted for age, BMI, symptoms of heart failure, hypertension, diagnosis at index event, diabetes, HDL-cholesterol, triglyderides, smoking, and education Controlling for work stress did not change the results! Depressive symptoms • • • • • • • • • Lack enthusiasm Poor appetite Feel lonely Feel bored Troubled sleep Cry easily Feel downhearted Low in energy Feel hopeless Pearlin, J Health Soc Behav 22:337-356 1981 Proportion of women surviving free of cardiac events according to sleep quality and depression 1,0 ,9 ,8 Poor/mod. sleep & two or more depressive sumptoms poor/mod. Sleep quality & no ore one depressive symptom good sleep quality & two or more depressive symptoms good sleep quality & no or one depressive symptom ,7 ,6 0 T im e (m o n th ) 20 40 60 80 Leineweber et al., 2002 Results Poor sleep quality and not feeling well-rested are associated with poorer prognosis in women with a prior cardiac event. Are variations in heart rate and rhythm - autonomic imbalance a mediating mechanism? HEART RATE VARIABILITY Derived from 24-hour Holter recordings: SDNN index Total power Low Frequency power (LF) High Frequency power (HF) Very Low Frequency power (VLF) SDNN index: average of the standard deviations of all normal to normal intervals for each 5-minute interval of the entire recording (ms) HRV - high (healthy) low (unhealthy) Heart rate variability = ability ofthe heart to react to stressors Differences in SDNN index (msec) between standard risk factor groups, adjusted for age (controls, N=249). Standard risk factors Smoking No Yes .05 Sedentary lifestyle No Yes .05 Obesity (kg/m2) BMI28.6 BMI>28.6 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 140 >140 Mean SEM P 42.9 40.0 .83 1.21 42.7 39.4 .77 1.48 43.2 37.6 .76 1.43 .001 43.0 36.1 .72 1.75 .001 Conclusions Social supports affect men and women differently Men benefit from both social integration and attachment Women´s close emotional ties sometimes stressful Cognitive group based one year educational program ”Friskare Kvinnohjärtan” Increased social support Increased self esteem Improved communication skills Topics discussed in the groups • Atherosclerosis and its risk factors • Psychological consequences of clinical CHD • Stress physiology. Recognizing multiple sources of stress - at work at home, elsewhere • Indivdual standard risk factor profile topics continued Positive/negative emotions Exercise book with daily concrete reports Maintained throughout the course exercises Daily practice of altered behavior: ”Choosing the longest line” ”Driving in the right lane” ”Avoid getting angry” ”Every patient needs to talk at least once every session” continued • Roles/”strong and weak legs to stand on” ”parent ” child” ”professional pride”… • ”avoid standing on just one leg” • adaptation to specific social conditions (work, professional,family life) • general life situation- how is life? How wouls I like it?What is important in life? The end