Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Dynamic Model Validation Project Jonathan Rose Engineer, Resource Integration Sidharth Rajagopalan Engineer, Dynamic Studies Synchrophasor Meeting November 16, 2012 Source: Need for Model Validation… November 16, 2012 https://www.wecc.biz/committees/StandingCommittees/PCC/TSS/MVWG/06212011/Lists/Pre sentations/1/201106%20Power%20Plant%20Model%20Validation%20Using%20Disturbance%20Data.pdf 2 Synchrophasor Meeting Validation Methodology • Compare computer simulations to actual generator behavior, measured during a disturbance. Field Measurements PMUs, DFRs... Compare Results Pass / Fail Channel Plot 70 69.5 69 68.5 68 67.5 67 66.5 66 65.5 65 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (seconds) b c d e f g November 16, 2012 3 100*A : Test7p b c d e f g 10 - MW : Test7p Synchrophasor Meeting Overview • Near Term Goals – Validate a few generator dynamic models based on available measured response during system events. • Long Term Goals – Develop plan to systematically validate generator models in ERCOT. – New responsibilities? (NERC MOD Standard) • Resource Entities, ERCOT, TSP – Install measurement devices • PMU at every power plant November 16, 2012 4 Synchrophasor Meeting Challenge #1: Gathering Measurements Generator POI • High-speed measurements of V, q, P, Q, Hz. • >= 30 samples / second. • Measure unit output , not plant. • Existing PMUs available to ERCOT – Installed for specific purpose of transmission observability. – none measure generator output • Some gen companies have continuous fault recorders – Difficult to access data. “Leap-frog” communication. – Need coordination on setting up recorders. • This issue is unresolved. – Only attempted to validate Governor models. November 16, 2012 5 Synchrophasor Meeting Possible Solution #1: Gathering Measurements Generator POI Need method to easily get data to ERCOT. • Install PMU or proper set Continuous DFR at each generator – Does not need to stream live data. (Communication $$). – PMU preferred over DFRs. – Installation and Maintenance • Provide easy access to data November 16, 2012 6 Synchrophasor Meeting Challenge #2: Identifying Disturbances Problem: Some stochastic disturbances difficult to monitor and identify. Available Difficult Frequency disturbances Voltage disturbance (e.g. faults) Angle disturbance due to unit trip Angle disturbance due to line open Possible Solution: • Move a nearby switched shunt. • Change generator voltage set point. November 16, 2012 7 Synchrophasor Meeting Brainstorming A Synchrophasor Plan… • PMUs for Operational Needs – Stream live data. – Penetration: capture system condition • PMUs for Generator Model Validation – Archive data for 30 days. Data downloaded as needed. – Measure terminal behavior of each plant. • Overlap? – Some generator PMUs stream data for Operations. November 16, 2012 8 Synchrophasor Meeting Thank You Questions? November 16, 2012 Synchrophasor Meeting ADDITIONAL MATERIAL November 16, 2012 10 Synchrophasor Meeting Overview of Validation Process 1. Capture electrical measurements during a disturbance using PMU. • Need plant-level or unit-level measurements. 2. Introduce disturbance and measurements into simulation. 3. Check that the simulated response matches plant actual response. 4. If not, discuss the results with the resource entity. Present independent variables (V, q, Hz) to Generator Test Generator POI Field Measurem ents Comparison Channel Plot 70 69.5 69 68.5 68 67.5 67 66.5 66 65.5 65 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (seconds) b c d e f g November 16, 2012 11 100*A : Test7p b c d e f g 10 - MW : Test7p 80 Measure vs. Simulation Pass /Fail. 90 100 Synchrophasor Meeting Example – Simple Model Validation Exercise November 16, 2012 12 Synchrophasor SPWG Meeting Types of Measurement Devices • Phasor Measurement Units – Stand-alone measurement device. High-fidelity. • Synchrophasors – Relay with PMU-like features. High-fidelity. – E.g. Schweitzer 421. • Digital Fault Recorders (Continuous) – Predecessor to synchrophasors. – Similar to PMUs except no GPS-clock and cannot measure angle. – May or may not be able to stream live measurements. • Digital Fault Recorders (Triggered) – Oscilloscope-type measurements that are triggered. Used for relay performance reviews, event forensics, etc. • SCADA November 16, 2012 13 Synchrophasor Meeting Measurement Device Comparison PMU & Synchroph. DFR High Speed Real Time GPS Clock Angle Meas Penetration Model Validation ~50 100’s Difficult 1000’s Governor Only SCADA November 16, 2012 14 Synchrophasor Meeting Gathering Measurements – Need a Good Disturbance! Pgen, Qgen V dq/dt Machine Vmeas AVR Qgen Hz GOV Pgen dw/dt PSS Pgen • The nature of the disturbance determines which system is affected. – Multiple disturbances needed to validate all parts of model. Response Disturbances GEN Fast Fault, sudden angle shift due to nearby unit trip / line open. AVR Fast Fault, switched shunt adjust, V-schedule adjust. GOV Slow Large unit trip anywhere. PSS Fast Nearby unit trip or line open. November 16, 2012 15 Synchrophasor Meeting Disturbances • Voltage Disturbances are difficult to find! – Wait for a fault? How know when it happened? • WECC creates their own disturbances – 1400 MW Chief Joseph braking resistor. • Could ERCOT do similar? – Disturb generator by adjusting nearby tap, switched shunt or change Voltage set point. Chief Joseph: November 16, 2012 16 Synchrophasor Meeting November 16, 2012 17 Synchrophasor Meeting