Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY • The “ecological movement” – Neisser’s call: • Cognition and Reality (1976) • Memory Observed (1982) – Banaji & Crowder (1989): Everyday memory is bankrupt • Low generalizability? • Lack of control • No new “principles” – “Applied” studies of memory continue to be popular • • • • • • Flashbulb memories Prospective memory Eyewitness testimony Traumatic amnesia Mnemonic techniques; expertise Autobiographical memory Memory for One’s Life Story: Content and Process • Biography and Culture – Biography as historical record – Biography as narrative – The “oral history” movement • AM as a social activity – Building and sharing our “life story” • Allende’s Paula (1995) – Socializing, bonding and constructing the “self” through recounting our story • Proust’s In Search of Lost Time (1922) – The importance of cues – Ecphory of the past and present • Memory is life: Rachel the Replicant – The importance of reminiscence among the elderly • Bluck: In search of wisdom – The adaptive functions of AM: fight, flight or flirt? METHODS OF TESTING AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY • Cuing methods – Free recall (and problem of clustering) – Cued recall • By word or phrase (Galton 1879; Crovitz 1974) • By date • By “life period” – Recognition (and issue of distractors) • How to verify memory? – Experimenters keeping diaries • Linton (75), Wagenaar (86): record events and contexts – Subjects keeping diaries • Brewer (88): random “moments” – Interviews with family members – Repeated testing of individuals STRUCTURE AND PROCESS IN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY • The forgetting function for AM – Strong recency effect – Quasilinear or power function? • Crovitz & Schiffman, 1974 • Wagenaar, 1986 – Content and cuing variables • Salience and emotionality • Number and type of cues Data from Wagenaar, 1986 – Deviations from the curve • Infantile amnesia and its causes • The “reminiscence bump” 15-25 yrs • Content of AM – AM as composite of episodic (spatiotemporal context) and semantic (personal and factual) information – EM as fleeting, unless “linked” to AM knowledge and context (Conway, 00) • EM (e.g., imagery) critical for cuing – Linked to or part of the “Self” and goal • Importance of self and goal hierarchy in Conway’s recent work – “Constructive” nature • 30% new details, 40% change in those called “distinctive”, over retest (Anderson & Conway, 94) – But also largely accurate • Constraints on errors • Rehearsal and stabilization of stories • Organization of AM – Conway & Rubin’s hierarchical model • Life Periods around Themes • General Events and “minihistories” • Event-specific Knowledge and details • Retrieval of AM – Retrieval as cyclic and effortful • General events the “typical” entry point via cues (cf. Rosch’s Basic Level?) • Top two levels accessed “semantically” • ESK within events accessed chronologically? – Free recall at first faster, then slower, than chronological (Anderson & Conway 93) • The pleasures of remembering – Photos, scrapbooks and diaries Crovitz & Schiffman, 1974 cue-word recall of AM Wagenaar 1986 Diary-based cued recall of AM Wagenaar 1986 AM content and access Functions are Wagenaar’s ratings at time of event, With “`1” the lowest in all cases