Download Lung Cancer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
LUNG CANCER
Jennie Hocking, MPAS, PA-C
FIGURE 1 Ten Leading Cancer Types for the Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths, by
Sex, United States, 2008
From Jemal, A. et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96.
Copyright ©2008 American Cancer Society
EPIDEMIOLOGY
 Men:

Rates declining
 Women


Rates still increasing
More likely to be nonsmokers
United States Cancer Statistics, 2001: Incidence and Mortality
EPIDEMIOLOGY-TEXAS
www.cdc.gov/cancer/lung/statistics/race.htm
ETIOLOGY-GENETICS
 Polyfactorial
Inactivated tumor supressor genes
 Tumor promotors



 Stem
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
cells
Chest. 2006;130:936-937
ETIOLOGY-GENETICS
 Family


First reports >40 years ago
Approx 2-fold increase risk for lung cancer



History/Clustering
Corrected for tobacco usage
10-15% of lung cancer patients have at least
one affected 1st-degree relative
No single gene isolated
ETIOLOGY
 Tobacco
 Cigars
& pipes
 Secondhand smoke
 Cigarettes


directly alter mucosal barriers
Chronic inflammation
Ciliary dysfunction
SMOKING HISTORY
 46
million US smokers (23% of population)
1
pack per day x 40 years = 40 pack years
OR
 2 packs per day x 20 years = 40 pack years
 Greatest


risk for lung cancer: >30 pk yrs
20 year lag period
Risk declines with tobacco cessation

15 year window
SMOKING HISTORY
 Cigarettes/pack

= 20
Marlboro Math
146,000 cigarettes

1 ppd x 20 years =

Retirement Savings: 2ppd x 50 years

Assume 10% annual interest
Retirement savings lost: $2,598,693
ETIOLOGY
 Other
Causes
Asbestos
 Radon
 Silica
 COPD
 Idiopathic

PATHOLOGY
 Two
main categories:

Small Cell (20%)

Non-small Cell (NSCLC)
Large cell (9%)
 Adenocarcinoma (and bronchoalveolar) (32%)
 Squamous (30%)


“Others”

Carcinoid, sarcomas, mucoepidermoid carcinomas and
undifferentiated, mesothelioma
PATHOLOGY
 Small
cell (oat cell)
Extremely rapid
growth
 Central location

http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/content/vol236/issue3/images/s
mall/r05se22g03b.gif
PATHOLOGY
Squamous cell
Central location
Exfoliates
Aggressive
imaging.consult.com
PATHOLOGY

Adenocarcinoma
Slow growing
 Peripheral location
 “Scar” tumor
 More common in
nonsmokers

PATHOLOGY
 Bronchoalveolar
(BAC)
 Form
of adenoca
 Nonsmokers
 Mucous producing
 Peripheral
 ‘Ground glass’
www.argjiro.net/albi/white/path/?album=148photo.id=49
PATHOLOGY
 Large
cell
 Poorly differentiated
 Peripheral
 Rapid growth
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
2-15% asymptomatic
 Symptoms related to:

Local Tumor Growth
 Local Spread of Tumor
 Metastasis
 Paraneoplastic Syndromes

LOCAL TUMOR GROWTH
 Cough:
pleura
irritation of endobronchial mucosa or
 Dyspnea:
obstruction, post-obstructive
pneumonitis
 Hemoptysis:
 Wheezing:
 +/-
minimal or massive
endobronchial obstruction
consolidation on exam
LOCAL SPREAD
OF
TUMOR

Chest pain: chest wall invasion

Hoarseness: left recurrent
laryngeal nerve

Effusion

Axillary/supraclavicular
lymphadenopathy

SVC syndrome: right
paratracheal node or RUL
tumor compression
www.meddean.luc.edu/.../lungca.svcphy.html
LOCAL SPREAD
 Pancoast
OF
TUMOR
Syndrome
 Superior
sulcus tumor
 Compresses brachial &
cervical nerve roots
 Manifestations:
Horner’s
syndrome
 Anhydrosis
 Arm pain/atrophy

www.mrcophth.com/.../oculoplasticgallery.html
DISTANT METASTASES
 Contralateral
lung
 Liver

Elevated LFTs
 Adrenals
 Bone
Elevated Calcium
 Bone pain
 Pathologic fractures

 Brain

±Neurologic signs/symptoms
PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES

Endocrine hormone secretion
PTH-like hormone secretion
 SIADH
 ACTH

Clubbing
 Anorexia, weight loss/cachexia, fever
 Other syndromes

Lambert-Eaton Syndrome
 Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthopathy
 Hematological abnormalities

DIAGNOSIS & STAGING
 Goal
#1 Obtain a tissue diagnosis and determine
the stage of malignancy efficiently and safely
 Goal#2 Determine patient candidacy for therapy
CHEST XRAY (CXR)



Relatively low cost
Readily available
Insensitive


Difficult to see all regions
of chest
Non-specific if no
symptoms
<5% of solitary pulmonary
nodules in mass screening
 Screening NOT proven to
impact mortality
Evaluate further w/CT scan


US Preventive Services Task Force, 2004
CHEST CT




More sensitive
Size, shape, and
invasion
Evaluate
lymphadenopathy
Pitfalls:



Radiation exposure
Cost
Moderate specificity
Not recommended for
screening

CHEST CT
 Approach:



Establish chronicity
Incidental,
asymptomatic, <1cm,
benign appearance, low
risk patient
Symptomatic, risk
factors, >1cm or
growing on serial scans
 Definitive workup
DIAGNOSIS-PET
Radiolabeled glucose
 Metabolically active cells




Uses



Heart, brain, kidneys, bladder
Cancer, infection
Determine activity of known
masses
Locate distant metastasis
Pitfalls



Can miss slow growing tumors
Can’t differentiate between
tumor/infection
Doesn’t accurately measure
size, growth
DIAGNOSIS-TISSUE
 Sputum



Cytology
Least invasive
Tumor location
important
Not recommended for
screening
DIAGNOSIS-TISSUE
 Bronchoscopy




Central lesions
Endobronchial tumors
Fluoroscopic guidance
for peripheral tumors
Mediastinal biopsies
DIAGNOSIS-TISSUE
 Needle
Biopsy
Good specificity
 Sensitivity varies
 Operator dependent
 Pneumothorax

DIAGNOSIS-TISSUE
 Surgical
Lung Biopsy
Thoracotomy is gold
standard
 Increased use of VATS
 CME for staging/dx

DIAGNOSIS-OTHER
 Labs:
STAGING STUDIES
CBC, chemistry panel w/calcium, coag
panel, LFTs
 MRI of brain
 CT abdomen/pelvis
 Biopsy of other sites
 ±bone scan, PFTs w/ABGs
echo, V/Q scan
TREATMENT
Smoking cessation
 Nutrition
 Surgery
 Chemotherapy
 Radiation
 Other Palliative Care

Airway stents/laser
 Indwelling pleural catheters
 Pain control
 Hospice


+/- Emotional support
http://www.co.jackson.mi.us/HD/images/PrevNews/GreatAmericanSO.jpg
STAGING-NSCLC

TNM system
T-tumor size &/or location
 N-lymph nodes
 M-metastasis
 Stage I (T1aN0M0)-Stage IV (TanyNanyM1or2)

STAGING, TREATMENT & PROGNOSIS - NSCLC

Stage I disease
No lymph node involvement
 Surgical removal



Follow Up with CT scans

43-64% 5-year survival (surgical)
Stage II & III disease


Lymph nodes involved or larger tumor or multiple lung
tumors
Surgery, radiation & chemotherapy may all play a role
in treatment
STAGING, TREATMENT &

PROGNOSIS-
NSCLC
Inoperable patients
XRT (via stereotactic approach) and chemotherapy
 5-25% long term survival


Stage IV disease
Chemo +/- XRT
 XRT/gamma knife for brain mets
 Occasionally some mets surgically resected
 Increases mean survival from 4-6 mo to 7-9 mo

STAGING & PROGNOSIS - SCLC
Limited: confined to hemithorax, regional nodes
 Extensive: all others (70% at diagnosis)
 Death in weeks to months if untreated


Median survival:
 Limited 16 – 24 months
 10-20% alive at 2 years
 Extensive 9 – 12 months
30% die of local tumor complications
 70% die of carcinomatosis

THERAPEUTICS - SCLC

Highly sensitive to chemo and XRT


Combination chemotherapy regimens best
Surgery not useful
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES



Minna JD, Schiller JH. Neoplasms of the Lung. In: Fauci, AS, Kasper, DL,
Longo, DL, Braunwald, E, Hauser, SL, Jameson, JL, Loscalzo, J. Harrison’s
Principles of Internal Medicine, 17th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008
Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT. The New Lung Cancer Staging System.
Chest. http://chestjournal.chestpubs.org/content/136/1/260.full.pdf+html
PACE curriculum, School of Allied Heath Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine,
2008

Hoopman, Todd, MD. PA lung cancer. 2006

Cedar Bluff CME. Neoplastic Disease. 2007

Humphrey L, Teutsch S, Johnson M. Lung cancer screening with sputum
cytologic examination, chest radiography and computed tomography: An
Update for the US Preventative Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med.
2004;140:740-753.