Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Championing Information Management Innovations to Improve System Performance and Patient Care Annual General Meeting April 22nd, 2010 Presented by Terrence Sullivan, PhD President & CEO Better cancer services every step of the way Overview 1 Cancer Care Ontario: 2009-2010 Year in Review 2 Championing Information Management to Improve System Performance and Patient Care 3 Panel Discussion and Dialogue 2010 Annual General Meeting 2 2008-2011 Cancer Plan: Goals SIX GOALS 1 Reduce the incidence of cancer 2 Reduce the impact of cancer through effective screening & early detection 3 Ensure timely access to effective diagnosis and high quality cancer care 4 Improve the patient experience across continuum 5 Improve the performance of cancer system 6 Strengthen translation of research into improvements in cancer control 2010 Annual General Meeting 3 2008-2011 Cancer Plan: Initiatives FOUR INITIATIVES 1 Transform cancer screening 2 Streamline and speed up cancer diagnosis 3 Regional Cancer Programs to achieve high quality cancer services in every LHIN 4 Prepare our services to respond to molecular oncology 2010 Annual General Meeting 4 Achievements in 2009-2010 • Renewal of Smoke-Free Ontario • Ontario Health Study pilot launched successfully 2010 Annual General Meeting • OBSP: OneMillionth Woman Screened • Launch of InScreen • Increased Stage Capture for newly diagnosed cancers • Launched Cancer Imaging Program Provincial and Regional Leads • ISAAC doubled number of patients completing ESAS assessments • ISAAC expanded to 17 hospitals, including 9 northern satellite sites • Imaging Leads in every region • Surgical wait times down 12% • MCC implementation • Increased access to IMRT 5 2009-2010: The Cancer Journey by the Dollars $8M $ 65 M $ 7.5 M $2M $ 548 M *Fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 2010 Annual General Meeting 6 2009-2010 Year in Review Financial Picture Access to Care Strategy 40M Funding to Healthcare Facilities and Universities 406M New Drug Funding Program 200M CCO’s Financial Ontario Renal Network 2009/10 Total Revenue 7M 737M Position (000s) Projected March 31, 2010 Actual March 31, 2009 150 2,209 NET POSITION 2010 Annual General Meeting 7 2009-2010 Year in Review Actual 2008-2009 Projected 2009-2010 Growth 433,186 497,536 + 14.86% New Radiation Cases 40,401 42,805 + 5.95% New Systemic Cases 42,491 42,675 + 0.43% 7,166 7,505 + 4.73% Service Volume Growth Screens for OBSP Additional Surgical Cases 2010 Annual General Meeting 8 2009-2010 Year in Review MOHLTC Revenue Growth MOHLTC Revenue 2010 Annual General Meeting Actual 2007-2008 Actual 2008-2009 Growth Projected 2009-2010 Growth 587M 650M + 10.8% 695M + 7.0% 9 2009-2010: A Growing Organization Infrastructure Programs Strategy 2010 Annual General Meeting Board requested internal audit of business processes in June 2009 Board Retreat in Fall assessed strengths/ weaknesses and future opportunities and priorities Launched corporate-wide business processes improvement project Ontario Renal Network (ORN) established in June 2009 Access to Care (ATC) continues to expand: Emergency Department/Alternate Levels of Care Ontario Cancer Plan renewal: 2012-2015 ORN initial plan 10 Ontario Renal Network Early priorities include: The Ontario Renal Network (ORN) is a new organization established to lead a province-wide effort to better organize and manage the delivery of renal services. 2010 Annual General Meeting Establishing/ensuring uptake of standards and guidelines Developing information systems and performance measures Ongoing needs assessment Capacity planning 11 Access to Care Cancer Care Ontario 2010 Annual General Meeting Provides strategic guidance and direction Executes Wait Time and Emergency Room/Alternate Level of Care strategies Provides applications, technical infrastructure and services in business strategies Data Reporting and Business Intelligence activities 12 Overview 1 Cancer Care Ontario: 2009-2010 Year in Review 2 Championing Information Management to Improve System Performance and Patient Care 3 Panel Discussion and Dialogue 2010 Annual General Meeting 13 A Burning Platform Growth of cancer incidence in Ontario Annual number of newly diagnosed cancer cases 75000 60000 aging 45000 population growth increasing cancer risk 30000 15000 0 1982 baseline cancer risk 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Year 2010 Annual General Meeting 14 A Happy Problem: Increased Survivorship Improvements in Age-standardized 5-year relative survival† for 14 common cancers‡ Ontario, 1992-1996 vs 2002-2006 1992–1996 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2002–2006 70% 80% 90% 100% Thyroid Prostate Melanoma of skin Breast** Corpus and uterus, NOS Urinary bladder Kidney and renal pelvis Colon and rectum Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Leukemia Ovary Stomach Lung and bronchus Pancreas 2010 Annual General Meeting 15 A Happy Problem: Increased Survivorship Growth in Prevalence with Improved Survival (Jan. 1, 1997 vs. Jan. 1, 2007 10 year) 350,000 Number of cancer survivors 300,000 250,000 All other cancers** (42%) 200,000 All other cancers** (45%) 150,000 Lung and bronchus (5%) Colon and rectum (12%) Lung and bronchus (6%) 100,000 Colon and rectum (13%) Female breast (20%) Female breast (21%) 50,000 Prostate (21%) Prostate (16%) 0 1997 2007 Source: Cancer Care Ontario (Ontario Cancer Registry, 2009) *Prevalence (10 year) is the number of Ontarians diagnosed during the previous 10 years who are still alive on Jan. 1, 1997 or on Jan. 1, 2007. **Excludes basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers, which are not registered in Ontario. 2010 Annual General Meeting 16 Common Elements of Performance Improvement (5-Country Framework*) Performance Knowledge Measures / Performance Indicators of Cancer Care Strategies for Collecting Data / Sources of Quality Data Performance Reporting * Responsabilite et performance en cancerologie Sullivan, Dobrow, Schneider et al, Prat Organ Soins 2008;39(3):207-15 2010 Annual General Meeting 17 Common Elements of Performance Improvement Active Levers for Performance Improvement Institutional and Leadership Alignment on Goals and indicators Commitment/Mobilization of Stakeholders Commitment of clinician and clinician leaders Engaging patients Public engagement Engagement of policy/administrative decision makers 2010 Annual General Meeting 18 Common Elements of Performance Improvement Active Processes Initiatives by Clinicians Payment Mechanisms Organizational Standards/Consolidation of Services Flexible Work Force Initiatives 2010 Annual General Meeting 19 How Do We Create Sustaining Value From Data? 1 Information requirements driven by business – clinicians, administrators, patients, funders 2 Collect once, use many times 3 Balance quality and utility 4 Integrate information collection into routine administrative and clinical processes 2010 Annual General Meeting 20 20 Align Clear Goals, Develop Measures and Monitor Ontario Cancer Plan 2012-2015 ? Better cancer services every step of the way 2010 Annual General Meeting 21 Strengthen Core Competencies 2010 Annual General Meeting Performance measurement and management cycle Development and adoption of standards and guidelines (PEBC) Public reporting and transparency in performance Clinical and Administrative Alignment of Leadership Successful deployment of IM/IT solutions to support the transformation of cancer care, access to care and Ontario Renal Network 22 Accelerate Patient-based Funding to Drive Access and Quality Surgical wait times and quality improvement Colonoscopy quality and data capture Renal registry expansion with incremental volumes funding System therapy volume expansion tied to regional standards 2010 Annual General Meeting 23 IM Tools ‘Instrumenting’ the Disease Journey • Symptom Management • Robust Date Systems - • Risk Factor Surveillance • In Screen • Integrated Cancer Screening • Diagnostic Assessment Programs • Recovery / Survivorship • Structured Care Plans • Wait Times • Computerized Physician Order Entry • Multi-disciplinary Case Conferences • Stage Capture • Quality Indicators Supported by IM/IT Cancer System Quality Index Disease Pathway Management Regional/Corporate Scorecard 2010 Annual General Meeting 24 screening Increasing Screening Rates for Colorectal Cancer CCO programmatic target: 40% by 2011 2010 Annual General Meeting 25 screening ColonCancerCheck: Information Driving System Change Information Driving Change OPERATE PROGRAM Identification Invitation Recall Reminder Result notification 2010 Annual General Meeting GET/USE INFORMATION Planning Funding Evaluation Contract management Performance management Quality management Access management Public reporting Research More Screening Better Screening Increased support for Primary Care 26 diagnosis treatment Wait Time Information System 2010 Annual General Meeting 27 diagnosis treatment CSA Funding Compared to Total Cost of Cancer Surgery CSA Funding Compared to Total Cost of Cancer Surgery Source: CIHI DAD/NACRS $400 Non-CSA Funding ('000,000s) CSA Funding ('000,000s) Cancer Surgery Funding ($'000,000) $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 Fiscal Year 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 Total Cancer Surgery funding is estimated by applying index surgery funding rates to all the hospitals in Ontario 2010 Annual General Meeting 28 treatment Ontario’s Wait Times: Worst to the Best Priority Areas PROV. CT MRI Hip Knee Can SR NL B B A B PE A B A F NS F F NB C F QC A ON Car* A NA B na A C A A A na na A A A A A MB B D A B A SK C F D C A AB A B D A A BC A B A A A NA Source: Wait Time Alliance Report Card 2010 Annual General Meeting 29 diagnosis One Stop Shopping: Diagnostic Assessment Programs (DAPs) Percentage With Abnormal Breast Screen and Resolution Within 7 Weeks (Target) All Women, Aged 50-69 Requiring a Tissue Biopsy, 2005-2008 Data Source: Provincial Breast Cancer Screening Data Base 2010 Annual General Meeting 30 diagnosis DAP Update Erie St. Clair: Lung Clinic South West: Lung Clinic Waterloo Wellington: Lung /Prostate/GI DAU Hamilton Niagara: Lung Clinic CW/MH: Lung Clinic* Toronto Central: Lung (TEGH) / Colorectal (Sunnybrook)* Toronto Central: Lung Clinic 2010 (PMH) Central: Colorectal* Central East: Lung Clinic* /Colorectal* South East: Colorectal* & Lung Clinic* Champlain: Lung Clinic /Colorectal /Prostate North Simcoe Muskoka: Lung Clinic / Colorectal* North East: Lung Clinic*/Colorectal* North West: Colorectal* / Lung Clinic* 2010 Annual General Meeting DAPS under development(*) and/or in place: Regions currently focused on coordinating activities around central intake of referrals for colorectal & lung diagnosis 31 Disease Pathway Management: Site and region-specific data for each phase of the journey- CRC • Crude / age standardized incidence 2010 Annual General Meeting • FOBT participation rates • % rectal cancer patients having MRI • Wait time from diagnosis to 1st treatment • Symptom assessment rates • Age standardized 5-year survival rates • Chemotherapy guideline concordance • % rectal cancer patients with rad onc consult 32 diagnosis Diagnostic Assessment Programs Diagnostic Processes Electronic Pathway Solution • Reduce diagnostic wait times • Reduce anxiety and confusion • Increase diagnostic volumes • Increase access to service • Coordinate diagnostic processes • Increase system efficiency • Reducing system waste • Increase capacity to properly manage patients with suspicion of cancer Diagnostic Wait Times • Validate the diagnostic wait times parameter • Develop cancer system indicators to monitor access & quality of care in diagnostic phase • Develop priority levels for testing Improves the patient experience, improves patient outcomes and quality of cancer diagnostic services 2010 Annual General Meeting 33 diagnosis treatment Improving Cancer Stage Data Collection and Cancer Pathology Reporting 90% target Since Implementation: Completeness of Pathology Reports 2010 Annual General Meeting 34 diagnosis treatment Synoptic Pathology Reporting: Implemented in 76% of Ontario Hospitals # of hospitals implemented # of hospitals that implement synoptic pathology reporting in discrete data fields (level 5 reporting for 5 common cancer resections) by date of GO-LIVE implementation 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Projected Actual Apr - Jun 2008 Jul - Sep 2008 Oct - Dec 2008 Jan - Mar 2009 Apr - Jun 2009 Jul - Sep 2009 Oct - Dec 2009 Jan - Mar 2010 Apr - Jun 2010 Quarter of Implementation % of hospitals implemented as of April 2010 LIHN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7a 7b 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ALL # hospitals implemented discrete synoptic reporting 5 14 6 9 2 3 2 4 5 7 5 4 0 14 1 81 Total # of hospitals 5 16 6 9 2 3 2 5 6 7 6 13 5 19 6 110 100% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 83% 100% 83% 31% 0% 74% 17% 74% % 2010 Annual General Meeting 35 treatment Improving Safety for Patients: Computer Physician Order Entry (CPOE) System Helps prevent approximately 8,500 drug errors, 750 hospitalizations, 500 physician office visits annually 2010 Annual General Meeting 36 treatment Engaged Clinicians: Prostate Margin Rate Audit Positive Surgical Margin Rate for Radical Prostatectomies for pT2 Patient Overall Since Synoptic Pathology “Go Live Date” to Sept. 2009 2010 Annual General Meeting 37 37 palliative and endof-life care Empowering Patients: Interactive Symptom Assessment and Collection (ISAAC) Tool 2010 Annual General Meeting 38 palliative and endof-life care Patient Based Tools 2010 Annual General Meeting 39 palliative and endof-life care How Are We Using Information to Add Value? Patient based payment tied to information management (IM) deployment Quality performance tied to evidence-based Clinical and Organizational Standards Targeted improvements in performance/quality Through IM and active engagement processes By Disease Site Targets By Regional Program Targets By Provincial Targets 2010 Annual General Meeting 40 Regional Performance Driving Improvement April 2010 SYSTEMIC Ref-Con = Apr-Dec 2009 Con-Tr = Oct-Dec 2009 RADIATION Apr-Dec 2009 Region WT WT Ref-Con RTT-Tr (% w/in (% w/in 14 days) target) Vol (C1R) % of WT WT Budgeted Ref-Con Con-Tr Vol in the (% w/in (% w/in Province 14 days) 14 days) Vol (C1S) SURGERY WT = Apr-Dec 2009 Vol = Apr-Dec 2009 % of WT Budgeted (% w/in Vol in the target) Province WT (90th) COLONOSCOPY WT & Vol = Apr-Dec 2009 Participation = 2006-2007 % of WT Vol Budgeted WT (Family (cases) Vol in the (FOBT+) History) Province Vol STAGE PATHOLOGY Rate = Apr 2009 # hosp = Mar 10, 2010 % Hosp = Mar 10, 2010 % Complete = Oct-Dec 09 SYMPTOM MGMT Oct-Dec 2009 FOBT % of % Hosp. % Hospitals Budgeted Participat Combined Collaborat % CompleteDiscrete Lung ion Vol in the Rate ive ness Path Report Province Staging * THORACIC Apr-Mar 08 All Other * RSTP Safe Change MCC Handling Overall from Q3 as of Provincial Previous 09/10 Rank Nov 09* Rank PROVINCE ▲ ▬ ▼ 100% ▲ ▲ ▼ 100% ▲ ▬ ▲ 100% ▲ ▬ ▼ 100% ▼ ▲ ▲ ▼ ▼ ▲ ▲ ▲ Waterloo Wellington ▲ ▲ ▼ 4% ▲ ▼ ▼ 6% ▲ ▬ ▲ 4% ▼ ▼ ▼ 6% ▼ ▬ ▲ ▼ ▼ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1 0 North Simcoe Muskoka ▲ ▲ ▼ 1% ▲ ▲ ▼ 6% ▼ ▲ ▼ 1% ▼ ▼ ▲ 1% ▲ ▲ ▬ n/a ▼ ▼ ▬ ▬ 2 1 North West ▲ ▲ ▼ 2% ▲ ▲ ▼ 4% ▲ ▬ ▼ 2% ▼ ▲ ▼ 3% ▼ ▬ ▬ ▲ ▼ ▼ ▬ ▲ 3 -1 Central ▼ n/a ▼ 0.2% ▲ ▼ ▲ 2% ▬ ▲ ▲ 10% ▲ ▬ ▼ 12% ▼ ▬ ▲ ▼ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 4 1 Erie St. Clair ▼ ▼ ▼ 3% ▲ ▼ ▼ 4% ▼ ▬ ▼ 4% ▲ ▲ ▼ 9% ▼ ▬ ▬ ▲ ▼ ▼ ▬ ▼ 5 -1 Toronto Central PMH ▲ ▲ ▼ 24% ▼ ▲ ▲ 16% ▲ ▲ ▲ 20% ▼ ▼ ▼ 4% ▼ ▲ ▬ ▲ n/a ▼ ▲ ▬ 6 0 South East ▲ ▼ ▼ 4% ▲ ▲ ▼ 5% ▲ ▲ ▼ 4% ▼ ▼ ▲ 6% ▲ ▬ ▲ n/a ▼ ▲ ▬ ▲ 7 3 Central East ▲ ▲ ▲ 4% ▲ ▼ ▼ 7% ▲ ▲ ▲ 3% ▲ ▲ ▼ 13% ▲ ▲ ▬ ▼ ▲ ▲ ▼ ▼ 8 3 Champlain ▼ ▬ ▼ 10% ▲ ▲ ▼ 11% ▲ ▲ ▲ 10% ▲ ▲ ▼ 10% ▲ ▲ ▬ n/a ▼ ▲ ▲ ▲ 8 1 Hamilton NHB ▼ ▼ ▲ 12% ▲ ▲ ▼ 9% ▼ ▼ ▲ 9% ▲ ▲ ▼ 15% ▲ ▲ ▲ n/a ▼ ▼ ▬ ▲ 10 -3 North East ▲ ▼ ▼ 5% ▼ ▲ ▼ 4% ▲ ▼ ▼ 4% ▲ ▲ ▼ 5% ▼ ▬ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▼ ▲ 11 -3 n/a ▼ 6% ▼ ▬ ▬ ▲ n/a ▲ ▲ ▲ ▼ ▲ 12 2 Central West & Miss. Halton ▲ ▲ ▼ 5% ▲ ▲ ▲ 5% ▲ ▼ ▲ 12% n/a ▲ n/a ▲ Toronto Central Odette ▼ ▲ ▼ 15% ▼ ▼ ▼ 11% ▲ ▬ ▼ 8% ▲ ▲ ▼ 3% ▼ ▲ ▬ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▲ 12 -1 South West ▲ ▲ ▼ 9% ▲ ▲ ▲ 10% ▲ ▬ ▲ 10% ▼ ▲ ▼ 6% ▼ ▲ ▲ n/a ▼ ▼ ▲ ▼ 14 -3 Performance against the regional target Not meeting target Not meeting target, but improving or meeting provincial target Meeting or within 2% of target. If the region has a stretch target, it is within 5%. 2010 Annual General Meeting Performance against the previous scorecard Improved Decreased No change 41 Society’s Data and IM Challenge “Information has gone from scarce to superabundant. That brings huge new benefits . . . but also big headaches.” “Managed well, the data can be used to unlock new sources of economic value, provide fresh insights into science and hold governments to account.” The Data Deluge, The Economist, March 2010 2010 Annual General Meeting 42 Overview 1 Cancer Care Ontario: 2009-2010 Year in Review 2 Championing Information Management to Improve System Performance and Patient Care 3 Panel Discussion and Dialogue 2010 Annual General Meeting 43 Future Opportunities, Challenges, Solutions How can information management address gaps in the patient journey? 2010 Annual General Meeting 44 Championing Information Management Innovations to Improve System Performance and Patient Care Annual General Meeting April 22nd, 2010 Presented by Terrence Sullivan, PhD President & CEO Better cancer services every step of the way