Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GCIG Cervix Committee November 14, 2008 GOG 240 Schema Eligibility: 1. Primary stage IVB or Recurrent/persistent carcinoma of the cervix 2. Measureable disease 3. GOG PS 0-1 R A N D O M I Z E Regimen I Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 IV d1 (24h) Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV d2 Q21d to progression/toxicity Regimen II Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 IV d1 (24h) Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV d2 Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV d2 Q21d to progression/toxicity Regimen III Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV d1 (3h) Topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 d1-3 (30m) Q21d to progression/toxicity Regimen IV Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV d1 (3h) Topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 d1-3 (30m) Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV d1 Q21d to progression/toxicity GOG 240 Primary & Secondary Endpoints • Primary Endpoints – 1. Survival time from date of randomization – 2. Frequency & severity of adverse events • CTCAE version 3.0 • Secondary endpoints – 1. PFS from date of randomization – 2. Frequency of objective tumor response GOG 240 Statistical Design • • • • Randomized, phase III trial 2x2 factorial design (n=450) Intent to treat principle Random assignment to the four arms balanced for – Disease status – Performance status – Prior platinum therapy with pelvic RT • Reduction of hazard of death by 30% by addition of either bevacizumab or non-platinum doublet important to detect • Interim analysis to be conducted after 173 deaths GOG 240 Toxicity monitoring Topotecan-Paclitaxel-related toxicities – DSMB evaluation (Myelosuppression and infection) Stage Cummulative Patients Min # Events 1 50 19 2 100 30 Bevacizumab-related toxicities – DSMB evaluation (Bowel perforation, hemorrhage, necrosis, fistula, PE) Stage Cummulative Patients Min # Events 1 50 12 2 100 18 GOG 240 Exploratory Endpoints • Health-Related Quality of Life – FACT-Cx TOI – FACT-GOG/Ntx subscale (neuropathy symptoms) – BPI single item for pain • Prospective validation of prognostic markers • Smoking behavior – Prevalence of active smoking – Extent of nicotine dependence – Nicotine dependence with PFS & OS • Translational science GOG 240 CellSearchTM Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Test Number of CTCs - Correlation with PFS & OS Clearance of CTCs - Correlation with response - Correlation with OS & PFS GOG 240 International Collaborators Norway: Gunn Kristensen MD Germany: Falk Clemens Thiel MD South Korea: Jong-Min Lee MD PhD Spain: Ana Oaknin Benzaquen GOG 240 International Collaborators NORWAY KOREA Kristensen, Gunnar Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway Department of Medical Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Jong-Min Lee, MD, PhD Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology East-West Neo Medical Center Kyung Hee University 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-090, South Korea E-mail; [email protected], [email protected] Office; 82-2-440-6140 Cell;82-11-738-3725 Fax; 82-2-440-7894 SPAIN Dra. Ana Oaknin Benzaquen Oncología Médica. División de Ginecología Institut Català d´Oncologia. Hospital Duran i Reynals Tel :+34.93.260.77.44 Fax:+34.93.260.77.41 e-mail:[email protected] GERMANY Falk Clemens Thiel, MD Department of Gynecology University Hospital Erlangen Universitätsstr. 2123 91054 Erlangen Germany Tel. +49 9131 8533553 GOG 240 Status This protocol has received approval by the NCI and Central IRB and we anticipate activation within the upcoming 2-3 months. John H. Farley MD Associate Professor Obstetrics and Gynecology Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences CVM0503 • To determine if combining Cetuximab with cisplatin during radiation therapy increases overall survival (OS) when compared with weekly cisplatin and radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer metastatic to high common and/or para-aortic lymph nodes. – Secondary Objective • To determine if the addition of Cetuximab to cisplatin and radiation therapy in this patient population improves progression-free survival (PFS). • To determine the relative toxicities of the addition of Cetuximab to cisplatin in this patient population. CVM0503 • Test the hypothesis that Cetuximab will be more effective in tumors that express low compared with high levels of the hypoxia marker Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1α) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), CVM0503 • Concurrent Weekly Cisplatin + Cetuximab (preferably Monday) – Cisplatin 30mg/m2/week x 6 weeks – Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 initial loading dose week 1, then 250 mg/m2 x 5 weeks • VERSUS • Cisplatin 30mg/m2/week x 6 weeks • In patients receiving extended field radiation therapy; pelvis and para-aortics. – – – – 4500 cGy in 29 fractions to the para-aortic nodes (150 cGy/fraction) 4500 cGy in 25 fractions to the pelvis CVM0503 (180 cGy/fraction) • Trial population • Cervical cancer patients with positive para-aortic and/or pelvic nodes : – Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Adenosquamous Carcinoma, • Clinical stages – IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IV • Number of subjects: 328 CVM0503 GOG-0233/ACRIN-6671 • UTILITY OF PREOPERATIVE FDG-PET/CT AND FERUMOXTRAN-10 MRI SCANNING PRIOR TO PRIMARY CHEMORADIATION THERAPY TO DETECT RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH LOCOREGIONALLY ADVANCED (IB2, IIA 4 CM, IIB-IVA) CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX. • Has accrued 22/325 patients GOG 219 October 23, 2008 GOG 219 • ACCRUAL TO DATE = 301 PATIENTS – Enrollment primarily from U.S. sites – International participation increasing, specifically NCI Canada • Factors (pro) – Starting dose reduced after 1st toxicity evaluation – NCIC sites gaining experience with regimen • Factors (con) – Regulatory bodies in other countries – International shipment of drug GOG-0219 ENROLLMENT BY QUARTER 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1ST Q 2006 3RD Q 2006 1ST Q 2007 3RD Q 2007 1ST Q 2008 3RD Q 2008 GOG-0219 AMENDMENT • The Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) of the Gynecologic Oncology Group convened to review the interim safety analysis as outlined in section 11.5 of the study. In reviewing toxicity data, there was a higher than 20% incidence of Grade 3 or 4 toxicity in the form of leucopenia and metabolic toxicity. Median length of radiation therapy was similar in both arms and there were no deaths related to study participation. Based on their review in assessing the clinical impact of the toxicity, the DMC recommended decreasing the starting dose on regimen II to by one dose level rather than two dose levels as originally stipulated in section 11.5. The starting dose on trial (now dose level I) is the previous dose level -1 from former versions (prior to NCI Version Date 10/03/2007). GOG-0219 AMENDMENT • Regimen II: Concurrent Cisplatin and TPZ and Radiation Therapy (10/23/2007) • Cisplatin 60mg/m2 (max = 105 mg) administered IV over 30-60 minutes days 1, 15 and 29 with radiation therapy • TPZ 220mg/m2 (max = 385 mg) IV administered over two hours prior to Cisplatin on days 1, 15 and 29 • TPZ 220mg/m2 (max = 385 mg) IV over two hours days 8, 10, 12, 22, 24, 26 with radiation therapy. GOG-0219 AMENDMENT • A second safety analysis will be performed after treating 30 more patients on the TPZ arm (with the new starting dose). In the event Grade 3 or 4 toxicity continues to be significantly higher among patients on the TPZ arm or duration of radiotherapy is prolonged significantly in any of the arms, the trial committee may recommend further dose modification or study termination. GOG-0219 CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 A Randomized Trial of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Postoperative Cervical Cancer with Intermediate Risk Factors Sang Young Ryu, M.D. Korea Cancer Center Hospital CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 • Adjuvant CCRT- High Risk Factor – SWOG 97-97 Peters 2000: Stage <IIB, LN, RM, PM: • FP CCRT(x2) + 2 FP vs RT – RR 0.50; PFS 80 vs 63%, OSR 81 vs 71%, – Local rec 20 vs 7, Distant rec 13 vs 9 – No brachytherapy – Toxicity; 21 vs 4 Gr IV toxicity • Aedno, adenosquamous CCRT; good but no statistic signif. – GOG 109; FP vs RT only; FP arm is superior to RT alone arm • high hematologic toxicity • Standard treatment CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 • Adjuvant CCRT-intermediate risk factors – No Clinical Trials – GOG 92 Sedlis 1999; IB intermediate, adjuvant RT vs no RT; • 2 of >1/3 stromal invasion, LVSI, tumor size • Rec Rate; 28 vs 15% • 2YDFS; 88 vs79%, RR 0.53 KCCH Retrospective Results RH with BPLND 735 cases 172 cases FIGO stage IB – IIA cervical cancer patients Any of intermediate risk factor 34 cases 49 cases 89 cases No further treatment RT only CCRT Fig. 1. Patients enrolled in this study CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 Control Arm; Radiation therapy Stage IB-IIA Radical hysterectomy+BPLND >2 of intermediate risk factors Randomization Cervical cancer CRT Arm; Weekly CDDP 40mg/m2 concurrent to radiation CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 – Primary endpoint; • 3 year recurrence free survival – 6.3% (87% to 93.3%) – Secondary endpoint; • Recurrence rate • Toxicity – QoL CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 • Pathology – Review pathologic slides • H&E only • Tumor cell type – Squamous, adenoca, adenosquamous • Depth of stromal invasion – in thirds of cervical thickness • Tumor diameter; palpation, largest diameter on section, imaging studies • Presence or absence of the LVSI CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 • Radiation (GOG 92) – Within 4-6 weeks postop • Weekly Hg >11mg/ml, ANC > 1000/ul, Plt >100,000/ul • Tranfusion of P/C or IV iron if necessary – ERT • Four field box technique with megavoltage beam • Dose 46Gy in 23 fraction,or 50.4 Gy in 28 fraction • Treatment break for clinical problems allowed to total no more than 1 week – No brachytherapy CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 • Chemotherapy – Eligible • Total WBC > 2,000/uL, ANC> 1000 /ul, Plt > 100,000/uL – Schedule (6 cycles) • 40mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 – Dose Reduction • 25% DR – grade 3 stomatitis – Nadir Plt < 50,000/ul, WBC <2000/uL->25% DR • 50% grade 4 stomatitis • Hold – Caluculated Ccr < 50ml/min – grade III, IV neuropathy CVM 0801/KGOG 1008 • Statistics – 6.3% increase of RFS – Power 80% – Type I error; 0.05 – Sample size: 480 – Total sample size: 534 – Total period: 54month – Expected events: 36 recurrences in control arm RTOG/GOG combined study for high-risk early stage Cervical Carcinoma Anuja Jhingran RTOG-0724 Background • 90% early stage cured with surgery or xrt alone • 15%-20% of early stage present with positive nodes, parametrium or margins survival drops to 50-70% with surgery alone • Even with adjuvant xrt - 40% fail - 10% in field and 10% out of field • Recent update of the SWOG trial – 5-yr survival with CT/RT – 2 or more positive nodes – 77% RTOG-0724 Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix GOG 109: Peters et al JCO 2000 Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix GOG 109: Peters et al JCO 2000 Rethinking the use of radiation and chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy: a clinical–pathologic analysis of a Gynecologic Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial Monk et al Gyn Onc 2005 Proposed Intergroup trial Stage I/IIA Cervical Cancer Radical Hyst: +LN’s, - include para-aortic nodes, and parametrium Randomize ARM 1 ARM 2 XRT 45 - 50 Gy Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 wkly XRT 45 - 50 Gy Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 wkly Carboplatin AUC 5 Paclitaxel 135mg/m2 q3weeks X4 400 pts PI’s A. Jhingran RTOG H. Gray GOG RTOG-0724 Hypothesis • To determine if adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following chemoradiation therapy will improve disease-free and overall survival compared to chemoradiation therapy alone in patients with high-risk early-stage cervical carcinoma found to have positive nodes and/or positive margins and/or positive parametria after a radical hysterectomy. The expected benefit would be approximately 10%-15% – Acrrual - 400 patients. RTOG-0724 Endpoints • 2.1 Primary objective: – Disease-free survival • 2.2 Secondary objective(s): – – – – 1) Toxicity 2) Overall survival 3) Quality of life 4) To collect fixed tissue to identify tumor molecular signatures that may be associated with patient outcomes. - 5) To collect blood from serum and plasma - looking factors correlated with toxicity and outcome RTOG-0724 RTOG 0724 • IMRT allowed. • Vaginal Brachytherapy allowed. RTOG-0724 New Concepts in Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Nick Reed Personal thoughts for debate at GCIG Nov 2008 Need for Improvement • Improving outcomes of bulky locally advanced cervix cancer • • • • New Approaches Induction / neoadjuvant schedules Maintenance treatments Targeted agents Functional Imaging Diagnostic Pathway Newly diagnosed Stage 1B2 – 4A Baseline Imaging NACT Induction Reassessment Imaging and CCRT CCRT So where is my evidence? Newer Approaches Induction • Meta-analysis from data with Cis +/• Carboplatin vs Cisplatin • Addition of Paclitaxel - Hoskin & GlynneJones • Mexico- Duenas -Gonzalez • UCL – McCormack CX2 study • Still premature but exciting interest The Study Options Maintenance chemotherapy NACT Induction CCRT Observation Reed’s Observations • I am convinced NACT is the way forward • I am convinced dose dense and dose intense schedules are needed • I think a taxane is essential rather than platinum alone • I think TR and functional imaging should be integral So what would I propose?? • Fresh tissue for banking +/- serum • Baseline scan , preferably PET CT +/- MRI (advice from radiologists) • Explore new imaging agents (hypoxia markers) • 9 weekly doses of carbo/paclitaxel (AUC 2-3 and pac 6080 mg/m2) • Reassess clinically and radiologically plus repeat samples for freezing Diagnostic Pathway Newly diagnosed Stage 1B2 – 4A Baseline Imaging TR Biopsy Imaging NACT Induction Reassessment Imaging and CCRT TR Biopsy Imaging CCRT Chemo-Rads CCRT • Proceed to standard concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) • Try for international consensus on EBRT dose and also BT The Other Option Maintenance • Why? • Tierney IPA suggests benefit • Which maintenance? • How many cycles • Conventional or TAT or both • Candidates The Next Steps • Next phase would be to consider adding a biological/TAT, maybe RCT phase 2 • Next phase would be to look at maintenance or no maintenance The Study Options Maintenance chemotherapy NACT Induction CCRT Observation Where next? • Discussion • Manchester SOTS?? A pilot study of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk cervical cancer Linda Mileshkin, Danny Rischin, Kailash Narayan ANZGOG Background • Early-stage cervical cancer is highly curable with surgical approaches or chemoXRT • Lower cure rates with more advanced disease seen in those who have not participated in screening • Traditional main prognostic factor is the FIGO staging system - principally based on clinical examination • Uterine and nodal involvement on imaging also prognostic ANZGOG Background • Prospective audit data from 238 pts treated with primary chemoXRT for cervical cancer • 170 (71%) had corpus invasion on MRI - 41% of these recurred cf. 19% without invasion • FIGO stage and clinical diameter not prognostic in the presence of uterine invasion • 108 (45%) had PET +ve nodal disease - 51% PET +ve recurred cf. 22% in PET -ve • Majority of recurrences distant ANZGOG Narayan K 2006 and 2007 Background – adjuvant chemo • Chemo concurrent with XRT improves survival and is standard care • Additional chemo after chemoXRT may treat distant mets and ↑ survival in high-risk pts • Few small retrospective studies with older chemo in unselected patients suggest no survival advantage and some toxicity • Carboplatin/paclitaxel active in cervical ca and likely more deliverable after XRT than cisplatin/topotecan ANZGOG Background – adjuvant chemo • GOG 109: post-op chemoXRT for those with +ve nodes/ margins or parametrium involved :2 extra cycles of cis/5FU given after chemoXRT : subset analysis suggested improved PFS and OS with more cycles of chemo ANZGOG Research Plan Design: Single-arm phase II study (n=30:pragmatic) Eligibility: Stage 1b-IVa cervical cancer suitable for primary treatment with chemoradiation with curative intent in addition to one of the high-risk features of: a)Pelvic nodal involvement on: - staging PET scan - staging CT if >15mm diameter, or - frozen section during planned surgery leading to abandonment of planned hysterectomy ANZGOG b) Uterine involvement on MRI Aims and Objectives • Aim: To test the feasibility of the regimen • Primary objective: To determine the percentage of patients able to complete all treatment components without significant treatment interruptions or omissions due to grade 3 or 4 toxicity • Secondary objectives: To determine the - Acute and long-term toxicities - Patterns of disease recurrence - Failure-free survival ANZGOG Intervention • 45-50.4 Gy of external beam XRT in 25 to 28 fractions plus brachytherapy • Cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly during XRT • Within 4 weeks of completion of XRT and following recovery from toxicities, 4 cycles of 3 weekly adjuvant chemotherapy using Carboplatin AUC 5 and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 ANZGOG Future phase III study Stage Ib-IVa Cervical cancer Node positive and/or Uterine invasion Standard chemoXRT 4 cycles Carboplatin + Paclitaxel Standard chemoXRT ANZGOG GCIG Consensus: Cervical Brachytherapy • Produce a document that can be used as a template for upcoming GCIG trials that contains “acceptable” evidence based brachytherapy dosing. • Akila Viswanathan has agreed to head the project. • Plan to work via e-mail and possibly conference call(s) with goal of finalizing the manuscript by the cervical SOTS meeting in 2009.