Download OWASP_ellak-Greece

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Computer security wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Detecting Web Application
Vulnerabilities Using Open
Source Means
OWASP
Konstantinos Papapanagiotou
Committee Member
OWASP Greek Chapter
[email protected]
3rd Free / Libre / Open Source
Software (FLOSS) Conference
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation
27/5/2008
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the OWASP License.
The OWASP Foundation
http://www.owasp.org
What is OWASP?
The Open Web Application Security Project
Worldwide, free and open community
Mission: improve application software security
Information and awareness
 Documentation
 Guidelines
 Forums, mailing lists, conferences, local chapters
Practical aspects
 Open Source Tools
Non-profit, charitable organization
Members: VISA, Deloitte, Unisys, Foundstone, …
OWASP
2
The Greek Chapter
Created in 2005 but active since early 2007
Mission: raise security awareness in Greece
Activities:
Translation of OWASP documentation
Mailing list
Monthly newsletter
Participation in working groups and conferences
Software tools: Web Vulnerability Scanner
~60 members
http://www.owasp.gr
Soon: http://blog.owasp.gr
OWASP
3
Outline
Motivation: The need for web security
Terminology
OWASP Top10: 10 most important vulnerabilities
Detection Tools
OWASP Web Scarab
WVS (Web Vulnerability Scanner)
Conclusions
OWASP
4
Web Security
Rapid growth of the Internet in the last 2-3
years
Increase of population and bandwidth
Dynamic web sites
Hacker trends have changed
Used to be: viruses, worms, defacements
Now: phishing, zombie networks, web application
security
Weakest links
End-users
Developers
OWASP
5
Web Application Vulnerabilities
Some vocabulary
Threats
Vulnerabilities
Exploits
Attacks
Patching…
Web Applications: new category of applications
Widely available
Can access local resources
New code – old code
OWASP
6
Tackling the problem
Security is not a one-off project
Secure Development Lifecycle:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Getting informed, raise awareness
Secure design and implementation
Product Launch
Vulnerability detection
Patching
Monitoring
Keep the track
Not a end-user or developer only matter
OWASP
7
Step 1: Awareness - The OWASP Top 10
Document that lists the 10 most important web
vulnerabilities
Aim: educate developers, designers, architects
and organizations about the consequences of
the most common web application security
vulnerabilities.
Provides:
Brief description
basic methods for protection
2007: second version
OWASP
8
The Vulnerabilities
A1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS)
User supplied data are sent to web browser without
validating or encoding that content.
Result: can allow script execution that can lead to
user sessions hijacking, web site defacement, etc.
A2 - Injection Flaws (e.g. SQL injection)
User supplied data are sent to an interpreter as part
of a command or query.
Result: the interpreter is tricked into executing
unintended commands or changing data.
OWASP
9
The Vulnerabilities (2)
A3 - Malicious File Execution (e.g. remote file
inclusion (RFI)
Can allow attackers to include hostile code and data
Result: up to total server compromise.
Target: PHP, XML and any framework which accepts
filenames or files from users.
A4 - Insecure Direct Object Reference
Reference to an internal implementation object (file,
directory, database record, key, etc) as a URL or form
parameter is accidentally exposed by the developer.
Result: Attackers can manipulate those references to
access other objects without authorization.
OWASP
10
The Vulnerabilities (3)
A5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Forces a logged-on victim's browser to send a preauthenticated request to a vulnerable web
application, which then forces the victim's browser to
perform a hostile action to the benefit of the attacker.
A6 - Information Leakage and Improper Error
Handling
Unintentional leak of information regarding
configuration, internal workings, or privacy violation
Result: Attackers use this weakness to steal sensitive
data, or conduct more serious attacks.
OWASP
11
The Vulnerabilities (4)
A7 - Broken Authentication and Session
Management
Account credentials and session tokens are often not
properly protected.
Result: Attackers compromise passwords, keys, or
authentication tokens to assume other users'
identities.
A8 - Insecure Cryptographic Storage
Web applications rarely use cryptographic functions
properly to protect data and credentials.
Result: can lead to identity theft, credit card fraud,
etc.
OWASP
12
The Vulnerabilities (5)
A9 - Insecure Communications
Applications frequently fail to encrypt network traffic
when it is necessary to protect sensitive
communications.
A10 - Failure to Restrict URL Access
Frequently, an application only protects sensitive
functionality by preventing the display of links or
URLs to unauthorized users.
Result: Attackers can use this weakness to access
and perform unauthorized operations by accessing
those URLs directly.
OWASP
13
Step 2: Detection – OWASP WebScarab
Framework for analysing applications that
communicate using HTTP and HTTPS.
Written in Java for portability
Operates as an intercepting proxy
The operator can review and modify requests created
by the browser before they are sent to the server
He can also review and modify responses returned
from the server before they are received by the
browser.
Several modes of operation and plugins
OWASP
14
Step 2: Detection – OWASP WebScarab (2)
Target Groups:
Developers can debug otherwise difficult problems
Security specialists can identify vulnerabilities in the
way that the application has been designed or
implemented.
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWA
SP_WebScarab_Project
Under Development: OWASP Web Scarab Next
Generation
Complete rewrite
New user interface
OWASP
15
Step 2: Detection – WVS
Web Vulnerability Scanner
Started off as a university student project
Goal: test a web site or application (not the
server in the back end)
Target group: security specialists, penetration
testers, developers
Functional but still under development
Beta version at: http://www.owasp.gr
(http://www.owasp.org/images/6/65/WVS_beta-0.2.1.zip)
OWASP
16
WVS – Design and Implementation
Three tier architecture:
Vulnerability database
 SQLite
 Data retrieval API
 Update API
Communication API
 Communication with server (GET, POST, etc)
Presentation Level
 Plaintext output, graphical interface, html, etc
Multi-threaded
User-specified
OWASP
17
WVS – Advantages
Less false negatives
“Paranoid scanning”
 User-enabled
 Retrieves the site’s structure
 Makes all possible checks in the entire site
Less false positives
Static sites: MD5 hash checking
Future work: dynamic sites
Portability
Use of open and portable technologies (SQLite,
libcurl, etc)
Future work: POSIX threads
OWASP
18
WVS – Future Work
Eliminate false positives in dynamic sites
Enhance Portability
POSIX threads
Java implementation (?)
Sophisticated checks for XSS and SQL injection
Fuzzing algorithms
Other suggestions…
OWASP
19
Conclusions
Web Application Security is a continuous process
Developers
have the skills
Are not always well informed
Organizations
Follow deadlines
Worry about security after release
End users
Low awareness
OWASP
Continuous effort to raise awareness
OWASP
20
Q&A
http://www.owasp.gr
http://www.owasp.org
OWASP
21