Download Supplementary material 1. Mathematical formulation and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Perron–Frobenius theorem wikipedia , lookup

Four-vector wikipedia , lookup

Orthogonal matrix wikipedia , lookup

Gaussian elimination wikipedia , lookup

Matrix calculus wikipedia , lookup

Cayley–Hamilton theorem wikipedia , lookup

Matrix multiplication wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Supplementary material 1. Mathematical formulation and instructions for implementing the
model in program E-SURGE.
Our multistate capture-recapture model is a particular case of a multievent models
developed by Pradel (2005). At a given sampling occasion, an animal may be pre-breeder
(state PB), breeder (state B), skipper (state S), or dead (state dead). The following
observations may be made: ‘1’ (if detected as chick), ‘2’ (if detected as adult) and ‘0’ (if non
detected). We define the initial state vector Π, the transition matrix ΦΨ (survival multiplied
by transition between states conditional on survival) and the event matrix B.
   1  
0 0 ,
1  1
0
1  1 
1  1  1 

0
 2  1  2 
 2  2
1   2 

 
,

0
 2  3
 2  1  3  1   2 


0
0
0
1 

1 0 
 p 1  p
.
B
0 0 


0 0 
Columns of the matrix Π and  correspond respectively to state PB, B, S and dead,
columns of the matrix B correspond to the observations ‘non detected’ and ‘detected’ while
rows of the matrices  and B correspond respectively to state PB, B, S and dead.
1 denotes the pre-breeder survival,  2 the adult survival (set equal for breeders and skippers
as skipper survival is not identifiable on its own), 1 is the probability of first breeding
attempt, 2 the probability that a breeder skips breeding for one year, 3 the probability that
a skipper returns to the colony (without distinction between one-year and multiple-year
skippers) and p is the detection probability.
Individuals are first captured as PB (group 1) or B (group 2); π (resp. 1− π) denotes the
proportion of newly marked in state PB (resp. state B). Φ1×Ψ1 (resp. ΦPB×(1−Ψ1 )) represents
the probability that a pre-breeder survives and attempts breeding (resp. survives and stays in
state PB). For an individual in state B, Φ2×Ψ2 (resp. Φ2×(1−Ψ2 ) ) represents the probability
that a breeder survives and skips breeding the year after (resp. survives and attempts breeding
the year after). For an individual in state S, Φ2×Ψ3 (resp. Φ2×(1−Ψ3 )) represents the
probability that a skipper survives and returns to the colony the following year (resp. survives
and skips breeding one more year). After the first capture, pre-breeders are not observed as
they do not attend the colony; skippers are never observed as they do not attend the colony;
we estimate breeders detection probability as they attempt the colony to breed.
Multistate models (see Lebreton et al. 2009 for a recent review) can be implemented in
program E-SURGE (Choquet et al. 2009) which is freely downloadable at
http://www.cefe.cnrs.fr/biom/En/softwares.htm. The first step is to load the data into the
program and specify the number of groups (2 here, individuals first captured as PB and B),
states (4 here), events (2 here), age classes (19 here) and covariates (age and age^2 here).
Then, the model specification procedure is decomposed into i) implementing the basic
structural form of the matrices using the GEPAT interface, ii) setting linear model of each
parameter using the GEMACO interface and iii) fixing initial parameters using IVFV
interface .
In the GEPAT module in E-SURGE, ‘*’ entries denote the complement of the sum of
positive row entries, and ‘-’ entries denote zeroes. For the initial states vector, the transition
(decomposed in two matrices, Φ gathering survival probabilities and Ψ gathering probabilities
of transition between states) and event matrices introduced above, we have:
   *  ,
   *
    *
,

    *


    *
 *   
 *  


  *  ,


   * 
*
p
B




* 



In the GEMACO interface (Choquet 2008), predefined shortcuts are used to specify
which parameters are time-constant, time-specific or state-specific (e.g. ‘i’ denotes constancy,
‘t’ means time effect, ‘a’ denotes an age effect, ‘g’ denotes a group effect, ‘x’ denotes a
covariate effect, and ‘from’ means that parameters are not equal in each matrix row). For the
best model, we used ‘i’ for initial parameters and ‘from(1).t+from(2:3).i’ for survival
probabilities –Φ1 time-dependant and Φ2 constant–,
‘from(1).[i+a*x(1,2)].t+from(2).t+from(3).i’ for transitions – Ψ1 has a quadratic effect of age
interacting with time, Ψ2 is time-dependent and Ψ3 constant–. For the events, we distinguished
the first from the following encounter occasions because the encounter history is conditional
on being caught in the first period and the following detection probabilities depend on the
group, the state and the time occasions. Hence, the formulation for the event is
‘from(1).a(1).g(1)+from(2).a(1).g(2)+from(1).a(2:20)+from(2).a(2:20).t’.
In the IVFV interface, when specifying initial parameter values, one should then
constrain the first beta value associated with the first detection for PB to 1 –
‘from(1).a(1).g(1)’ –, the second beta value associated with the first detection for B to 1 –
‘from(2).a(1).g(2)’ –, the third beta value associated with the detection of PB after the first
capture to 0 – ‘from(1).a(2:20)’ –before running the model.
References
Choquet R. 2008. Automatic generation of multistate capture recapture models. The Canadian
Journal of Statistics 36, 43-57.
Choquet, R., L. Rouan, and R. Pradel. 2009. Program E-SURGE: a software application for
fitting multievent models. Pages 845–865 in D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch, and M. J.
Conroy, editors. Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations, Vol. 3.
Springer Series: Environmental and Ecological Statistics, New York.
Lebreton, J. D., Nichols, J. D., Barker, R. J., Pradel, R. & Spendelow, J. 2009 Modeling
Individual Animal Histories with Multistate Capture–Recapture Models. Advances in
Ecological Research 41, 87-173
Pradel, R. 2005 Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to
Uncertain States. Biometrics 61, 442–447.