* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Finance 510: Microeconomic Analysis
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Finance 510: Microeconomic Analysis Technology, Cost, and Price Oil prices are currently hovering around $60/barrel. This is a 50% increase from one year ago! How will this rise impact the prices of final goods? Production Decisions Product Markets Factor Markets Supply/Demand Determines Factor prices Factor Usage/Prices Determine Production Costs Supply/Demand determine markup over costs Production theory begins with the assumption that every producer has a technology available to convert various inputs into output. Its usually convenient to represent this technology with a production function F : AB F A Set of inputs B Output Short Run vs. Long Run It is important in production theory to distinguish the short run from the long run. In the short run, some of the inputs into production are fixed. In the long run, all inputs are changeable. “Fixed” Inputs Output Inputs Output Variable Inputs Short Run Long Run Properties of Production y F (k , l ) Labor Output F (k , l ) 0 Fk (k , l ) 0 Fl (k , l ) 0 for all for all k, l k, l Fkl (k , l ) Flk (k , l ) 0 Capital (Fixed in the Short Run) (Output is positive) (Production is increasing in all factors) for all k, l (Factors are complements in production) Short Run Properties: Marginal Returns As labor increases (given a fixed capital stock), labor productivity decreases Fll (k , l ) 0 is fixed As labor increases (given a fixed capital stock), labor productivity increases Fll (k , l ) 0 y 0 k y F (k , l ) F (k , l ) l l 0 k Long Run Properties is variable Fk (k , l )dk Fl (k , l )dl 0 l Marginal Product of Capital Marginal Product of Labor Fk (k , l ) dl TRS dk Fl (k , l ) l F (k , l ) y k k The Technical rate of substitution (TRS) measures the amount of labor required to replace each unit of capital and maintain constant production Long Run Properties k is variable Fll (k , l ) 0 MRS (k , l ) MRS (k ' , l ' ) * * l If you have a lot of capital relative to labor, then TRS is low)! l* F (k , l ) y l' k* k' k Long Run Properties l l k k is variable ' l % k %TRS l k k The elasticity of substitution measures curvature l d k TRS d TRS l k Long Run Properties Increasing Returns to Scale Constant Returns to Scale Decreasing Returns to Scale k is variable F (2k ,2l ) 2 F (k , l ) F (2k ,2l ) 2 F (k , l ) F (2k ,2l ) 2 F (k , l ) Cost Minimization The cost function for the firm can be written as TC rk wl Given the costs of the firm’s inputs, the problem facing the firm is to find the lowest cost method of producing a fixed amount of output Min rk wl l ,k subject to F (k , l ) y Cost Minimization: Short Run Fixed Cost Min rk wl l subject to k is fixed F (k , l ) y (l ) rk wl F k , l y Cost Minimization: Short Run k is fixed (l ) rk wl F k , l y First Order Necessary Conditions l (l ) w Fl (k , l ) 0 y F (k , l ) w Fl ( k , l ) F (k , l ) y k Cost Minimization: Short Run is fixed (l , ) rk wl F k , l y w Fl ( k , l ) F (k , l ) y Recall that lambda measures the marginal impact of the constraint. In this case, lambda represents the marginal cost of producing more output Fll (k , l ) 0 Fll (k , l ) 0 Marginal costs are increasing Marginal costs are decreasing Fll (k , l ) 0 Marginal Cost vs. Average Cost d rk wl dy rk wl rk wl y y y Costs ATC Minimum ATC MC AVC y Fll (k , l ) 0 Marginal Cost vs. Average Cost d rk wl dy rk wl rk wl y y y Costs ATC AVC MC y Cost Minimization: Long Run Min rk wl k ,l subject to k is variable F (k , l ) y (l, ) rk wl F k , l y Cost Minimization: Long Run k is variable (l, ) rk wl F k , l y First Order Necessary Conditions l (l , ) w Fl (k , l ) 0 k (l , ) r Fk (k , l ) 0 y F (k , l ) 0 r Fk (k , l ) w Fl (k , l ) Min rk wl k ,l subject to F (k , l ) y l r Fk (k , l ) w Fl (k , l ) w r Fl (k , l ) Fk (k , l ) l* F (k , l ) y k* k Elasticity of Substitution is small l mc w w is small l y l k w is large k mc w is large l y Marginal Cost vs. Average Cost d rk wl dy Costs F (2k ,2l ) 2 F (k , l ) rk wl y MC AC y Marginal Cost vs. Average Cost d rk wl dy F (2k ,2l ) 2 F (k , l ) rk wl y Costs MC = AC y Marginal Cost vs. Average Cost d rk wl dy F (2k ,2l ) 2 F (k , l ) rk wl y Costs AC MC y Estimating Production Functions y F (k , l ) Ak l %A %y %k %l Labor Growth Capital Growth Output Growth Productivity Growth Example: Estimating Production Functions y Ak l A Cobb-Douglas Production function was estimated for the aggregate production sector of the US y Ak l .63 .30 Average Annual Growth = 1.5% 1 Example: Estimating Production Elasticities y Ak l p lnp Non-Production Labor Production Labor Food/Beverage .555 .439 .076 1.070 Textiles .121 .549 .335 1.004 Furniture .205 .802 .103 1.109 Petroleum .308 .546 .089 .947 Stone, Clay, etc. .632 .032 .366 1.029 Primary Metals .371 .077 .509 .958 Industry Profit Maximization and Industry Dynamics After the determination of optimal production, the firm is faced with a cost function… TC TC ( y ) Further, the firm faces a demand for its product… y y ( p) A quick diversion… Demand refers to output as a function of price y y ( p) p Inverse demand refers to price as a function of output p p( y) p D y y Profit Maximization and Industry Dynamics After the determination of optimal production, the firm is faced with a cost function… TC TC ( y ) Further, the firm faces an inverse demand for its product… p p( y) A firm needs to choose output to maximize profits… ( y ) p( y ) y TC ( y ) Profit Maximization max p( y) y TC ( y) y First Order Necessary Conditions dp dTC ( y ) y p 0 dy dy Marginal Cost (MC) dp y p MC dy First Order Condition dp y and divide the p p MC Multiply first term by p dy p 1 A little rearranging p p MC Now, solve for price MC p 1 1 dp y p MC dy p Initially, you are charging price (P) and generating sales equal to Y p Revenue = P*Y To increase sales, you must lower your price D y y Cost, Price, and Market Structure Market Structure Spectrum Perfect Competition The market is supplied by many producers – each with zero market share Monopoly One Producer Supplies the entire Market Measuring Market Structure – Concentration Ratios Suppose that we take all the firms in an industry and raked them by size. Then calculate the cumulative market share of the n largest firms. Cumulative Market Share 100 A C 80 B 40 20 0 01 Size Rank 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 Measuring Market Structure – Concentration Ratios Cumulative Market Share 100 A C 80 B 40 20 0 01 CR4 Size Rank 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 Measures the cumulative market share of the top four firms Concentration Ratios in US manufacturing; 1947 - 1997 Year CR50 CR100 CR200 1947 17 23 30 1958 23 30 38 1967 25 33 42 1977 24 33 44 1987 25 33 43 1992 24 32 42 1997 24 32 40 Aggregate manufacturing in the US hasn’t really changed since WWII Measuring Market Structure: The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) N HHI s i 1 2 i si = Market share of firm i s 2i Rank Market Share 1 25 625 2 25 625 3 25 625 4 5 25 5 5 25 6 5 25 7 5 25 8 5 25 HHI = 2,000 The HHI index penalizes a small number of total firms Cumulative Market Share 100 A HHI = 500 80 B HHI = 1,000 40 20 0 01 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 The HHI index also penalizes an unequal distribution of firms Cumulative Market Share 100 80 HHI = 500 HHI = 555 A 40 B 20 0 01 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 Concentration Ratios in For Selected Industries Industry CR(4) HHI Breakfast Cereals 83 2446 Automobiles 80 2862 Aircraft 80 2562 Telephone Equipment 55 1061 Women’s Footwear 50 795 Soft Drinks 47 800 Computers & Peripherals 37 464 Pharmaceuticals 32 446 Petroleum Refineries 28 422 Textile Mills 13 94 Perfect Competition p MC p 1 1 Perfectly competitive firms are so small relative to the market that they can’t influence market price – they face a perfectly elastic demand curve MC ATC p D y* y p MC Perfect Competition p MC p 1 1 As we move from the short run to the long run, firms adjust their capital structure (move from short run cost functions to long run cost functions) p MC = AC y* y p MC Monopoly p MC p 1 1 Monopolies by definition face the entire market demand. Therefore, monopolies charge a markup over marginal cost – as the elasticity of demand increases, the markup decreases. MC Example ATC p 2 p 2 * MC MC D MR y* y Monopoly p MC p 1 1 As we move from the short run to the long run, firms adjust their capital structure (move from short run cost functions to long run cost functions). Typically, demand also becomes more elastic as consumers find substitute products MC Example 4 p D p 1.33 * MC MC y* y MR Higher market concentration offers the potential for market power. However, does high market concentration guarantee market power? P MC LI P Perfect Competition p MC LI 0 The Lerner index measures the percentage of a product’s price that is due to the markup Monopoly MC p 1 1 LI 1 Lerner index in For Selected Industries Industry LI Communication .972 Paper & Allied Products .930 Electric, Gas & Sanitary Services .921 Food Products .880 General Manufacturing .777 Furniture .731 Tobacco .638 Apparel .444 Motor Vehicles .433 Machinery .300 P MC LI P Cost Structure and Market Structure – Does it pay to be big? The output elasticity of costs is defined as the percentage increase in total costs for every 1% increase in production %TC dTC y MC %y dy TC AC If the output elasticity is less than one, then total costs are growing at a rate that is lower than output (Average Costs are declining) – It pays to be big!! S 1 A scale economy index larger than one indicates the potential for a monopoly! Cost Structure and Market Structure – Does it pay to be big? Costs ATC If market demand is always below y*, than this industry could become monopolistic!! MC y* S 1 y Globally scale economies Globally scale economies (S>1 for all y) are known as natural monopolies (the market should – and will – be serviced by one producer). This can happen if production exhibits increasing returns to scale, or if there are large fixed costs. Costs Costs ATC MC ATC MC Monopoly Market Characteristics Scale economies (Natural Monopolies) Small market size Network Externalities Government Policy (Protected Monopolies) Any one of these characteristics suggest that the long run market structure should be monopolistic.