* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Principles of Economics
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Principles of Economics Session 7 Topics To Be Covered Characteristics of Monopoly Sources of Monopoly Monopoly vs. Competition Profit Maximization for a Monopoly Pricing for a Monopoly Measuring Monopoly Power Monopoly vs. Efficiency Price Discrimination Value-Based Pricing Market Structure Perfect Competition Monopoly Oligopoly Monopolistic Competition Characteristics of Monopoly One seller but many buyers One product (no good substitutes) Barriers to entry Price maker Monopoly While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker. Why Monopolies Arise The fundamental cause of monopoly is barriers to entry. Sources of Barriers to Entry Ownership of a key resource. The government gives a single firm the exclusive right to produce some good. Costs of production make a single producer more efficient than a large number of producers. Ownership of a Key Resource Although exclusive ownership of a key resource is a potential source of monopoly, in practice monopolies rarely arise for this reason. Government-Created Monopolies Governments may restrict entry by giving a single firm the exclusive right to sell a particular good in certain markets. Patent and copyright laws are two important examples of how government creates a monopoly to serve the public interest. Natural Monopolies An industry is a natural monopoly when a single firm can supply a good or service to an entire market at a smaller cost than could two or more firms. A natural monopoly arises when there are economies of scale over the relevant range of output. Average Total Cost Economies of Scale as a Cause of Monopoly The scale on which natural monopoly exists Economies of scale 0 Constant Returns to scale ATC in long run Diseconomies of scale Quantity of Cars per Day Monopoly versus Competition Monopoly Is the sole producer Has a downward-sloping demand curve Is a price maker Reduces price to increase sales Competition versus Monopoly Competitive Firm Is one of many producers Has a horizontal demand curve Is a price taker Sells as much or as little at same price Demand Curves for Competitive and Monopoly Firms Price A Competitive Firm Price A Monopolist Demand Demand 0 Quantity of Output 0 Quantity of Output A Monopoly’s Revenue Total Revenue P x Q = TR Average Revenue TR/Q = AR = P Marginal Revenue DTR/DQ = MR A Monopoly’s Total, Average, and Marginal Revenue Quantity 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Price $11.00 $10.00 $9.00 $8.00 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 Total Revenue $0.00 $10.00 $18.00 $24.00 $28.00 $30.00 $30.00 $28.00 $24.00 Average Revenue -$10.00 $9.00 $8.00 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 Marginal Revenue -$10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 -$2.00 -$4.00 A Monopoly’s Marginal Revenue A monopolist’s marginal revenue is always less than the price of its good. The demand curve is downward sloping. When a monopoly drops the price to sell one more unit, the revenue received from previously sold units also decreases. A Monopoly’s Marginal Revenue Demand P = a + bQ Total Revenue TR = PQ = (a + bQ)Q = aQ + bQ2 Marginal Revenue MR = TR’(Q) = a + 2bQ Demand and Marginal Revenue Curves for a Monopoly Price $11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 P =11 -Q Demand (average revenue) P =11 -2Q Marginal revenue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Quantity of Water MR and Elasticity for a Monopoly P, MR $3.00 When Ed>1, MR > 0 When Ed = 1, MR = 0 Ed>1 When Ed<1, MR < 0 Ed = 1 1.50 Ed<1 MR 0 1 P=AR=D 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Qd A Monopoly’s Marginal Revenue When a monopoly increases the amount it sells, it has two effects on total revenue (P×Q). The quantity effect—more output is sold, so Q is higher. The price effect—price falls, so P is lower. MR, P $3.00 TR=P ×Q TR=P ×Q 1.50 MR 0 1 TR=P ×Q P 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Qd TR 9.00 0 TR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Qd Profit Maximization of a Monopoly A monopoly maximizes profit by producing the quantity at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost. MR=MC Profit-Maximization for a Monopoly The demand curve shows the price consistent with this quantity. Costs and Revenue B Monopoly price The intersection of MR and MC determines the profitmaximizing quantity Average total cost A Demand Marginal cost Marginal revenue 0 QMAX Quantity Profit Maximization for a Monopoly Revenue ($s per year) TR Slope of TR = MR 0 Output (units per year) Profit Maximization for a Monopoly Cost $ (per year) TC Slope of TC = MC 0 Output (units per year) Profit Maximization for a Monopoly Cost, Revenue, Profit ($s per year) TC A TR B 0 q1 MR=MC Output (units per year) Profit Profit Maximization for a Monopoly Cost, Revenue, Profit ($s per year) TC TR A B 0 q2 Profits are maximized when MC = MR. q1 q3 Output (units per year) Profit Pricing for a Monopoly MR=MC can be translated into a rule of thumb for pricing which can be more easily applied in practice through the following steps. Pricing for a Monopoly DTR D ( PQ ) MR TR' (Q ) DQ DQ DQ DP DP P Q P Q DQ DQ DQ Q DP P P( ) P DQ %DQ DQ / Q DQ P Ed = %DP DP / P DP Q Pricing for a Monopoly Q DP 1 P DQ Ed 1 MR = P P Ed 1 P(1 ) Ed Pricing for a Monopoly Profit is maximized at MR=MC 1 MC = P( 1 ) Ed MC P= 1+1/Ed Pricing for a Monopoly Assume MC = $9 and Ed = -4, the price can be decides as follows so as to maximize the profit: MC P 1 1/Ed 9 9 $12 1 1 / 4 0.75 Monopoly vs. Competition For a competitive firm, price equals marginal cost. P = MR = MC For a monopoly firm, price exceeds marginal cost. P > MR = MC The Monopolist’s Profit Costs and Revenue MC Monopoly E price B ATC Average total cost D C D= AR MR 0 QMAX Quantity The Monopolist’s Profit The monopolist will receive economic profits as long as price is greater than average total cost. However, monopoly does not necessarily mean profit. The Monopolist’s Loss Costs and Revenue MC Loss ATC Average total cost Monopoly price c B E D= AR MR 0 QMAX Quantity Monopoly vs. Competition Costs and Revenue Price during patent life MC Price after patent expires MR 0 Monopoly Competitive quantity quantity D Quantity No Supply Curve for a Monopolistic Market Monopolist may supply many different quantities at the same price. Monopolist may supply the same quantity at different prices. No Supply Curve for a Monopolistic Market $/Q Shift in demand leads to change in price but same output MC P1 P2 D2 D1 MR2 MR1 Q1= Q2 Quantity No Supply Curve for a Monopolistic Market $/Q Shift in demand leads to change in output but same price MC P1 = P2 D2 MR2 D1 MR1 Q1 Q2 Quantity Measuring Monopoly Power Lerner’s index (L) is an efficient way to measure the monopoly power. The larger the value of L (between 0 and 1), the greater the monopoly power. L = (P - MC)/P = -1/Ed •Ed is elasticity of demand for a firm, not the market The Welfare Cost of Monopoly In contrast to a competitive firm, the monopoly charges a price above the marginal cost. From the standpoint of consumers, this high price makes monopoly undesirable. However, from the standpoint of the owners of the firm, the high price makes monopoly very desirable. The Efficient Level of Output Price Marginal cost Value to buyers Cost to monopolist Value to buyers Cost to monopolist 0 Demand (value to buyers) Efficient quantity Value to buyers is greater than cost to seller. Value to buyers is less than cost to seller. Quantity The Deadweight Loss Because a monopoly sets its price above marginal cost, it places a wedge between the consumer’s willingness to pay and the producer’s cost. This wedge causes the quantity sold to fall short of the social optimum. The Inefficiency of Monopoly Price Deadweight loss Marginal cost Monopoly price Marginal revenue 0 Monopoly Efficient quantity quantity Demand Quantity The Deadweight Loss The deadweight loss caused by a monopoly is similar to the deadweight loss caused by a tax. The difference between the two cases is that the government gets the revenue from a tax, whereas a private firm gets the monopoly profit. Public Policy Toward Monopolies Government responds to the problem of monopoly in one of four ways. Making monopolized industries more competitive. Regulating the behavior of monopolies. Turning some private monopolies into public enterprises. Doing nothing at all. Increasing Competition with Antitrust Laws Antitrust laws are a collection of statutes aimed at curbing monopoly power. Antitrust laws give government various ways to promote competition. They allow government to prevent mergers. They allow government to break up companies. They prevent companies from performing activities which make markets less competitive. Two Important Antitrust Laws Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) Reduced the market power of the large and powerful “trusts” of that time period. Clayton Act (1914) Strengthened the government’s powers and authorized private lawsuits. Regulation Government may regulate the prices that the monopoly charges. The allocation of resources will be efficient if price is set to equal marginal cost. Marginal-Cost Pricing for a Natural Monopoly Price Average total cost Regulated price Loss Average total cost Marginal cost Demand 0 Quantity Regulation In practice, regulators will allow monopolists to keep some of the benefits from lower costs in the form of higher profit, a practice that requires some departure from marginal-cost pricing. Public Ownership Rather than regulating a natural monopoly that is run by a private firm, the government can run the monopoly itself. (e.g. in China, the government runs China Post). Price Discrimination Price discrimination is the practice of selling the same good at different prices to different customers, even though the costs for producing for the two customers are the same. Prerequisites for Implementing Price Discrimination The firm must have some market power. Price discrimination is impossible in a perfectly competitive market. The good or service cannot be resold between customers. Some objective criteria can be applied to segment customers according to their elasticity of demand. First Degree Price Discrimination First degree price discrimination is also called perfect price discrimination, under which the monopolist knows exactly the willingness to pay of each customer for each unit of product and charges a different price for each unit. First Degree Price Discrimination Under first degree price discrimination, the lower price charged to one customer won’t lead to the decrease of higher prices charged to other customers, so the negative price effect is effectively prevented, thus: P = MR Welfare Without Price Discrimination Price Monopolist with Single Price Consumer surplus Monopoly price Deadweight loss Profit Marginal cost Marginal revenue 0 Quantity sold Demand Quantity Welfare With Price Discrimination Price Monopolist with Perfect Price Discrimination Profit Profit increases while consumer surplus becomes zero. Deadweight loss is avoided, thus efficiency is realized. Marginal cost Demand=P=MR 0 Quantity sold Quantity Second Degree Price Discrimination Second degree price discrimination is pricing according to quantity consumed or in blocks. For example, when consumers purchase 6 units of goods, the price is $6, when consumers purchase 4 units more, the price for the additional 4 units is $5, and so on. Third Degree Price Discrimination Under third degree price discrimination, the monopolist charges different prices for goods sold at different markets or to different groups of consumers. Welfare With Third Degree Price Discrimination Price Consumer Surplus P1 Deadweight Loss P2 P3 Marginal cost Marginal revenue 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Demand Quantity Examples of Price Discrimination Airline prices Discount coupons Quantity discounts Value-Based Pricing Value-Based Pricing Don’t need to price by identity Offer product line, and watch choices Design menu of different versions Target different market segments Price accordingly (self selection) Dimensions to Use Delay (Feeleral Express, PAWWS) User Interface (DialogWeb, DataStar) Image Resolution (PhotoDisk) Speed of operation (Mathematica) Flexibility of use Dimensions to Use Capability (Kurzweil) Features and functions (Quicken) Comprehensiveness (DialogWeb, DataStar) Annoyance Support Making Self-Selection Work May need to cut price of high end May need to cut quality at low end Value-subtracted versions May cost more to produce the low-quality version. In design, make sure you can turn features off! Online and Offline Versions The Whole Internet Netscape Navigator Dyson Dictum: think of content as free Focus on adding value to online version National Academy of Science Press Format for browsing, not printing How Many Versions? One is too few Ten is (probably) too many Two things to do Analyze market Analyze product Bundling Offer a package Microsoft Office 90% market share Work together Discount one of the products Option value: zero incremental price Microsoft's per-processor license Reduce Dispersion Example: price separate or together Mark: $120 for WP, $100 for spreadsheet Noah: $100 for WP, $120 for spreadsheet Profits Without bundling: $400 With bundling: $440 Information Bundles Magazines and newspapers Customized bundles Nonlinear pricing In previous example sell first item for $120 Sell second item for $100 Example: MusicMaker Assignment Review Chapter 9 Answer questions on P169 Preview Chapter 10 Thanks