* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Xenotransplantation
		                    
		                    
								Survey							
                            
		                
		                
                            
                            
								Document related concepts							
                        
                        
                    
						
						
							Transcript						
					
					Xenotransplantation Georg Kallert February 14, 2002 Xenotransplantation • Transplanting animal organs and tissues into human • “Excitement” – Provide organs to all the patients who need them • “Controversy” – Infectious agents from the donor animals might be passed to the organ recipients and the population at large Transplant Organs • More than 75,000 Americans are waiting to receive human organs (est. 180,000 globally), but less than 1 in 3 will get one • Some countries have allowed the sale of organs from executed prisoners • Scientists have been experimenting for many years with animal transplants, especially from primates • Globally, the market for transplant organs is estimated at $6 billion Transplant Organs from Pigs • Scientists are now focused on using pigs as a source for transplant organs • Why pigs? – available in large numbers – their organs are similar in size and nature to those of humans (especially miniature pigs) Recent News • Two firms that are researching organ transplants from pigs have each announced that they cloned female miniature pigs without a specific gene that causes immune rejection in humans • Important milestone: first pigs to be cloned with a removed gene, as cloning pigs with added genes has been done in the past • The pigs are missing one of the two genes needed for making an enzyme for sugar production Knockout Pigs • Piglets without one gene for -1,3-galactosyl transferase, yet since they have the other gene, they are still producing this enzyme -1,3-galactosyl transferase • This enzyme enzyme catalyses the synthesis the sugar, -1,3-galactosyl, or alpha-gal • This sugar is on the pig cell’s surface and is easily detected as foreign by human antibodies • If the pig cells with alpha-gal were inserted in the human body they would be killed immediately How was the Gene removed? • Used a "gene trap" vector, a piece of DNA containing snippets complementary to the target gene • Vector was moved to Nucleus using electricity • Odds of a successful insert were 1 in 5 million • The modified fetal cells were fused with oocytes whose chromosomes had been removed • Implanted the embryos into sows that had just come into heat Remaining Obstacles • Produce a male litter with one gene and mate them to with the female litter to get piglets with no genes for -1,3-galactosyl transferase – Takes up to 18 months, not guaranteed – Pigs without any gene for the enzyme may die, but mice with the double knockout did not • Treat any further immunes responses • And prevent the spread of viruses across species from transplants, xenozoonosis Immune Responses • Hyperacute rejection (in minutes) – Destroys blood vessels in organ, cuts off oxygen – Alpha-gal is the main cause, but other sugars exist • Delayed xenograft rejection (in days) – Build-up of antibodies and killer cells in the organ – Little data to determine effect of absence of alpha-gal • T-cell-mediated chronic rejection (months-years) – Presence of alpha-gal does not effect this barrier – Medicine used in human transplants would not work – Inject donor pig’s thymus cells develop tolerance PERV • Porcine endogenous retroviruses are present in the genome of all pigs • They could spread to donors and then all humans • Researchers state their cloned pigs consistently test negative for transmission of PERV to human cells in vitro • Cultured human cells can be infected by PERVs released from cultured pig cells • But, humans receiving pig tissues or blood plasma have never been affected • Three possible explanations for this protection Defense #1 • PERVs lack the “equipment” to infect human cells in vivo • However, immunodeficient mice have been infected by PERVs in experiments with transplanted islet cells – Believe that rodent viruses and retroviral elements may have combined with PERV to allow infection – This could happen with humans Defense #2 • Human cells lack the proper receptor for binding or the machinery to allow PERVs to replicate – If this is the case, then PERVs will pose little or no threat Defense #3 • The body’s immune system, T-4 cells and antibodies • Even when immune system is suppressed for transplant, PERVs could still be eliminated • Experiment to try: do PERVs infect mice with functional immune systems Role of the Antibodies • As the virus envelope is made of cell membrane it would also contain the alpha-gal sugar • Human antibodies would attack it just as they attack a pig cell • However, altered pigs could yield the virus without alpha-gal, and the antibodies may not detect it Ethics • Should we be tampering with animals? • Should we be putting animal parts in humans? • Do the researcher’s cloned pigs really have no PERV DNA? • Is it worth exposing the entire human population to dangerous viruses? • Should xenotransplantation be a “last resort” or the “best option?” • What are humans with animal parts? Polling Data • In a 1998 study, more than 75% of Americans would consider a xenotransplant for a loved one if no human organs were available • However 75% of Americans admit to knowing very little about xenotransplantation • Opposition is greatest among the most informed • Most worried about compatibility, not viruses • Preferred primate donors, as opposed to pigs • Spiritual leader approval was important • Europe: only 36% saw it as morally acceptable Conclusions • By removing the gene for the enzyme an important hurdle has been crossed • Immunological barriers still remain • Virus risks are not yet fully understood • Even though there is ban on non-human primate transplants, pig clinical trials may be allowed • So human trials may be just four years away Bibliography Butler, Declan. “Poll reveals backing for xenotransplants.” Nature 391, 315 (1998). -----. “Xenotransplant experts express caution over knockout piglets.” Nature 415, 103 - 104 (2002). Kaiser, Jocelyn. “Cloned Pigs May Help Overcome Rejection.” Science 295, Issue 5552, 25 (2002) L. Lai et al. “Production of -1,3-Galactosyltransferase Knockout Pigs by Nuclear Transfer Cloning.” Science 295, Issue 5557, 1089-1092 (2002) Platt, Jeffrey L. “Xenotransplantation: New risks, new gains.” Nature 407, 27 - 30 (2000). Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. “Breakthrough in Pig Cloning Could Aid Organ Transplants.” New York Times, Jan. 4 (2002) Q&A