Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Università degli Studi di Milano Molecular docking and QSAR analysis: a combined approach applied to FTase inhibitors and a1a-AR antagonists Giulio Vistoli, Alessandro Pedretti The Farnesyltransferase •The Farnesyltransferase (FTase) catalyzes the transfer of a farnesyl group from farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) to a specific cysteine residue of a substrate protein through covalent attachment. •This post-translational modification is believed to be involved in membrane association due to the enhanced hydrophobicity of the protein upon farnesylation. •This modification process has been identified in the Ras proteins that play a crucial role in the signal transduction pathway that leads to cell division. •Preventing the farnesylation process may be a possible approach for anticancer chemotherapy. •Knowledge about the active site environment of FTase is important in designing of new potent enzyme inhibitors. Pattern Recognition •The FTase recognizes the CA1A2X at the C-terminal position of the RAS protein: CA1A2X •C is the cysteine residue to which the prenyl group is attached; •A1 and A2 are aliphatic amino acids; •X is the carboxyl terminus specifying which prenyl group is attached (geranylgeranyl or farnesyl group). •The enzyme catalyzes also the transfer of the farnesyl group on the partial tetrapeptide isolated from the main chain. RAS Protein Posttranslational Modification O H N Val-Ile-Met-OH O FTase SH H N + O O P O O OP Val-Ile-Met-OH S O- O 1. Endoprotease 2. Methyltransferase O Palmitoylzation and membrane localization H N OMe S The Farnesyltransferase Crystals Structure Water molecules a subunit •The crystal structure of rat FTase was resolved at 2.25 Å resolution. • This protein is an heterodimer consisting of 48 kD (a) and 46 kD (b) subunits. •The secondary structure of both a and b subunits appears largely composed of a-helices. Zn b subunit •A single zinc ion, involved in catalysis, is located at junction between the hydrophilic surface of b subunit and the hydrophobic deep cleft of a subunit. •The zinc is coordinated by three b subunit residues and one water molecule. Classification of the FTase Ligands FTase Peptidomimetics Substrates Transition state analogues Activators Inhibitors FPP mimetics Natural comp. Catalytic mechanism Inhibition mechanism Pharmacophore Computational Methods •FTase crystal structure refinement The structure was minimized using both steepest descent algorithm until RMS = 0.5 and conjugated gradients until RMS = 0.01, keeping backbone constrained to preserve the experimental structure. The water molecules are preserved in all simulations. •Construction of the ligands The conformational analysis was performed using high temperature (2000 K) molecular dynamics (500 ps), which is able to span the conformational space of flexible molecules. The best structure obtained was finally optimized by MOPAC 6.0. •Docking analysis It was performed using BioDock: a software for automated docking of ligands to biomacromolecules, based on a stochastic approach. BioDock The complex is bad Ligand Receptor Random rototranslation of the ligand NO Complex evaluation New complex End of docking Cluster analysis YES Cluster 1 Stop Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster n CA1A2X Peptides HS H N + H3N O N H O H N HS O O- + H3N S O Cys-Val-Ile-Met (CVIM) O H N N H O O H N O O OH Cys-Val-Leu-Ser (CVLS) NH HS H N H3N O O N H H N O HS O OS Cys-Val-Trp-Met (CVWM) H N H3N O O N H H N O O OS Cys-Val-Phe-Met (CVFM) CVIM Peptide Conformations CVIM - extended dist. = 11.6 Å CVIM - folded dist. = 8.3 Å CVIM Conformational Analysis Activator CVWM Conformational Analysis Inhibitor Conformational Analysis Results From these results, we can suppose a hypothetical catalytic mechanism consisting of two steps: Recognition Conformational interconversion Folded conformation Activation Extended conformation Natural Inhibitors(1) O HO O COOH O O O OH COOH COOH Zaragozic acid H3C IC50 = 12 nM CH3 H3C O OH MeO O O H H3C H H OH HO CH2 H CH3 O O H O CH3 O O O O Artemidolide Fusidienol IC50 = 360 nM IC50 = 300 nM Natural Inhibitors(2) H3C H3C CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 HOOC CH3 HOOC CH3 O HOOC O Des-A Des-B IC50 = 0.9 mM IC50 = 0.19 mM CH3 CH3 O CH3 R O HOOC H3C COOH Z-Schizostatin IC50 = 300 mM H O COO- CH3 OH H H3C CH3 Andrastatin A (R =CHO) IC50 = 24.9 mM Andrastatin B (R =CH2OH) IC50 = 47.1 mM Andrastatin C (R =CH3) IC50 = 13.3 mM FTase - Fusidienol Complex Alpha subunit Beta subunit Site Selectivity Compound Type VO%CVLS VO%FPP CVLS - 100 0 FPP - 0 100 Fusidienol N.S. 15,7 17,7 Zaragozic acid N.S. 41,7 41,3 Andrastatin A CVLS 43,3 6,1 Andrastatin B CVLS 41 11,9 Andrastatin C CVLS 44 6 Arteminolide CVLS 47,3 26,9 Clav-A 1S,2R CVLS 54,7 4,4 Clav-B 1S,2R FPP 26,5 39.3 Schizostatin Z FPP 10 36.6 Schizostatin E FPP 7.1 27.8 Inhibition mechanism (Type): N.S. (not-selective), CVLS (peptidomimetic), FPP (FPPmimetic). Classification of the Natural Inhibitors Zaragozic Acid Non specific pos. Fusidienol volume VCVLS VFPP Zn++ shielding VCVLS VFPP Natural inhibitors Peptidomimetic VCVLS VFPP Artemidolide lipole FPP-mimetic VCVLS VFPP Schizostatin The Lipole The lipole is calculated as sum of local values of logP, like dipolar momentum: L ri i i Where: ri is the distance between atom i and the geometric center of the molecule; li is the atomic value of the lipophilicity of atom i. Lipole and Site Selectivity Compound Type Lipole LogP CVLS - 2.2 -0.5 FPP - - - Fusidienol N.S. 1.4 1.8 Zaragozic acid N.S. 0.8 2.0 Andrastatin A CVLS 2.2 1.7 Andrastatin B CVLS 2.2 1.6 Andrastatin C CVLS 2.5 2.7 Arteminolide CVLS 2.5 1.8 Clav-A 1S,2R CVLS 2.1 6.0 Clav-B 1S,2R FPP 4.3 4.2 Schizostatin Z FPP 6.7 1.4 Schizostatin E FPP 6.0 1.3 Lipole < 2.0 Non-specific inhibitors 2.0 < Lipole < 4.0 Peptidomimetics Lipole > 4.0 FPP-mimetics VEGA and the Lipole Calculation VEGA Main Features VISUALIZATION File Conversion Data Interchange Force field attribution Docking analysis Surface Mapping Shape Analysis Web Publishing Property Calculation Trajectory Analysis Dynamic Animation Time Profiling Flexibility analysis Pharmacophoric Model Arg-202b Arg-291b N H NH2 + OH HN NH2 H2N Zn++ + NH 2 Electron rich zone Tyr-300b Tyr-361b NH HO Aromatic functions HN N N His-201a + NH3 His-248b Amidic groups Lys-164a + NH3 Lys-356b PHARMACOPHORIC GROUPS Acknowledgments Bernard Testa Luigi Villa Anna Maria Villa Lidia Perri Eleonora Vocaturo Antonio Boccardi http://users.unimi.it/~ddl