Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Optimal Supply Chain Design of Green Biorefineries in Austria Assessment of Current and Potential Policy Support Schemes Stefan Hoeltinger, Johannes Schmidt, Martin Schoenhart & Erwin Schmid Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid Introduction – Biorefineries and the bioeconomy University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences  Biorefinery concept is the key to meet major objectives of a Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE)      Substitution of fossil fuels Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions Efficient use of biomass resources (for material and energy production) Establish competitive bio-based industries Increase regional value added  „Biorefining is the sustainable processing of biomass into a spectrum of marketable bio-based products and bioenergy” IEA - Task 42 Biorefineries Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 2 Introduction – The Green Biorefinery Concept  Feedstocks  green biomass (fresh grass, grass silage, sugar beet leaves, …) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences  Products  organic acids, feed proteins, fibre products, electricity and heat  Drivers for the green biorefinery concept in Austria  Expected oversupply of grassland areas due to changes in agricultural policies and structures  Alternative utilization for grassland biomass to preserve cultural landscape  Employment opportunities for rural areas Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 3 Introduction – The Green Biorefinery Concept  Simplified process overview of the green biorefinery demonstration plant in Utzenaich, Austria and biogas as reference technology Green biorefinery system Reference system - biogas Grass silage Grass silage Mechanical separation Press juice University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Press cake Membrane separation Biogas + Chp Ion exchange chromatography Electrodialysis Amino acids Lactic Acid Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid Heat Electricity Biogas + Chp Heat Electricity 4 Methods and Data  Spatially explicit mixed integer programming model that maximizes profits of the whole supply chain by selecting optimal plant type, location and capacity  The model considers University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences  feedstock-, transportation-, operationand capital costs  revenues from product sales  Regional disparities in biomass supply and heat demand determine profitability and sustainability of biomass supply chains  Spatially explicit data for  Regional biomass supply (aggregated to 250 supply regions)  heat demand (MWh) pro km² (Schmidt et al., 2010) Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 5 Methods and Data  Sensitivity analysis - Monte-Carlo simulation to deal with uncertainties of input parameters  varying market conditions  upscaling costs  efficiency of conversion technologies University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences  5 Policy Scenarios      No policy support schemes Feed-in tariff 150 € per MWhelectricity Feed-in tariff 100 € per MWhelectricity Investment subsidy 20 % of total investment costs Processing-aid for cascade utilization of grass silage in a green biorefinery 10 € per t dry matter (dm) grass silage Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 6 Results – feedstock assessment  Positive Agricultural Sector Model Austria (PASMA)  Supply curve for energetic and material utilization of grass silage  No effect on livestock 160 numbers  Additional supplies through 140 120 Price (€ / t dm) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences 100  Intensification measures 80 (Nitrogen fertilizer inputs)  Crop rotation changes on arable land  Increased feed imports 60 40 20 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Grass silage supply (Million t dm) Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 7 Results – feedstock assessment  Feedstock prices paid by biogas plants and green biorefineries for all 500 simulation runs Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences 8 Results - capacities  Mean capacities and transportation distances for the realized green biorefineries and biogas plants for all 500 Monte Carlo simulation runs University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Biorefineries are more capital intensive than biogas plants -> larger capacities to benefit from economies of scale for capital costs Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 9 Results – profitability  Relative revenues for different policy scenarios University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Subsidies Amino acids Lactic acid Electricity Heat  Guaranteed feed-in tariffs contribute to up to 55 % of biogas revenues  Revenues of green biorefineries largely dependent on market prices for organic acids Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 10 Results – profitability  Relative costs for different policy scenarios University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Feedstock costs Transportation costs Variable operation costs Capital costs  Feedstock costs contribute about 50 % of biogas costs  Energy intensive downstream and separation technologies are the main drivers for the costs green biorefineries Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 11 Results – profitability  Boxplots for the profitability of green biorefineries (GBR) and biogas plants University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences  Higher profits for green biorefineries, but also higher uncertainty Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 12 Conclusions and outlook  Green biorefineries can offer a profitable utilization pathway for grass silage in Austria under favourable market conditions  Profitability of green biorefineries is very sensitive to University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences  market prices of organic acids  the development of separation and downstream costs  upscaling costs from pilot- to industrial scale  Profitability of biogas plants is largely dependent on the current policy support schemes (feed-in tariffs)  Sustainability assessment along the whole supply chain to prove ecological sustainability of green biorefinery concept  More intensive cultivation methods and longer transportation distances Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 13 Thank you for your attention University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Economics and Social Sciences Institute for Sustainable Economic Development Stefan Hoeltinger, Johannes Schmidt, Martin Schoenhart & Erwin Schmid Feistmantelstraße 4, A-1180 Vienna Tel.: +43 1 47654-3650 [email protected] , www.boku.ac.at/454.html 26.06.2012 Hoeltinger, Schmidt, Schoenhart, Schmid 1414