Download - Cal State LA - Instructional Web Server

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Computational Analysis of the Structure
of Human Histamine 2 GPCR
Presented by Alana Canfield
William Goddard
Ravi Abrol and Soo-Kyung Kim
SoCalBSI Program
August 21, 2008


GPCR : G-Protein Coupled Receptor
H2 is a histamine receptor involved in gastric
acid secretion in gastrointestinal system.
Image courtesy of http://www.zmnh.uni-hamburg.de/schaller/gpcr.jpg

Membrane proteins are involved in a large
number of biological processes.
◦ Signal transduction pathways


Lack of crystal structures makes
computational approaches necessary.
Structures are needed in therapeutic drug
design.
◦ More than 50% of marketed drugs target GPCR’s
Beta-2 Receptor
Asp98
TM3
TM3
TM5
H2 Receptor: Optimize Asp98
Asp98
TM5
TM3
TM5
Individual Helices
Determine
transmembrane
residues.
Optimize helix kinks.
Predict orientations of
helices according to
template crystal structure.
Helix Bundle
Determine
helix
orientations in space.
Analyze final bundle
structurally and
energetically.
Bundle+Ligand
Add
extracellular loops.
Use final structure to
dock various ligands.
Analyze possible
activation pathways.

Transmembrane (TM) regions predicted using
hydrophobicity profile and homology search.
Hydrophobicity Value
Hydrophobicity Plot
1
1 2 3
4
5
6 7
0.5
0
-0.5
0
100
200
-1
300
400
REGION
CONSENSUS RESIDUES
TM1
TM2
TM3
TM4
TM5
TM6
TM7
KITITVVLAVLILITVAGNVVVCLAV
NCFIVSLAITDLLLGLLVLPFSAIYQLSCK
NIYTSLDVMLCTASILNLFMISLD
RVAISLVLIWVISITLSFLSIH
EVYGLVDGLVTFYLPLLIMCITYYRIFK
KATVTLAAVMGAFIICWFPYFTAFVYRGLR
EAIVLWLGYANSALNPILYAALNR
-1.5
Residue Number

The ‘cap’ regions (helix ends) must carefully be
considered.
Transmembrane Region 7
H1 :
H2 :
H3 :
H4 :
FINAL:
NEHLHMFTIWLGYINSTLNPLIYPLCNE
NEVLEAIVLWLGYANSALNPILYAALNR
PDYWYETSFWLLWANSAVNPVLYPLCHH
KSVWYRIAFWLQWFNSFVNPLLYPLCHK
EAIVLWLGYANSALNPILYAALNR


Helices may have characteristic ‘kinks’.
For individual helices, all residues except Pro,
Gly, Thr, and Ser were alanized.
◦ This results in conformational sampling while
maintaining the over helix character
Kinked Helix
Un-kinked Helix
Bovine Rhodopsin AND Human Beta-2 Adrenergic Receptor
Area AND Rawmid
Minimum Energy AND Minimum RMSD
Not Alanized
Alanized
De-alanize All
De-alanize Raw
The Energetic/Structure Story:

Compare to Bovine Rhodopsin and Human
Beta-2 Crystal Structures
‘2-3-4’-Similar Network
NPxxY Region
THR2.49
TYR7.53
ASP2.50
SER2.45
ASN7.49
ASN3.42
The Energetic/Chemical Structure Story:

Many favorable inter-helical hydrogen bonds.
Bond
RMSD/AREA & Dealanize All
RMSD/AREA & Dealanize Raw
Asp186-Arg257
2.64
2.64
Cys102-Tyr250
3.33
3.32
Tyr94-Tyr78
3.32
3.24
Asp64-Tyr288
2.74
2.75
Asp64-Asn284
2.83
2.85
Tyr288-Asn284
2.98
4.06
Thr63-Asn108
2.73
2.73
Tyr278-Gln79
2.72
2.72
Ser59-Asn108
3.10
3.08
Ser59-Thr63
3.98
3.96
Cys246-Asn280
3.36
3.36
Ser105-Asp64
3.77
3.62
Asn108-Ser59 (#2)
2.96
2.97
The Energetic/Chemical Structure Story:

Of the top energy structures, the two best structural
results are:
◦ 1) RMSD analysis, ‘area’ midpoint, ‘all’
dealanization.
 Rotation Angles: 90-30-0-120-180-330-0
◦ 2) RMSD analysis, ‘area’ midpoint, ‘raw’
dealanization.
 Rotation Angles: 90-30-0-120-180-330-0

Note that the rotation angles are the same!
Further Structural Analysis - Homology:
Asn1.50 and W4.50
Rotations: 90-30-0-120-180-330-0
Rotations: 300-30-0-30-180-330-0
THR2.49
TRP4.50
THR2.49
ASN3.42
ASN3.42
SER2.45
TRP4.50
SER2.45

Docking to four receptors:
◦ 1) Best energetic/chemical structure and 2) best
homology-based structure.
 Both 1) and 2) : with and without rotamer optimization
of Asp98.
optimize
Asp98
Asp98
Cimitidine (crystal)
Clobenpropit
ICL 162846
Tiotidine


I am docking the ligand cimitidine.
Final goals for group: Compare the four
different histamine receptors in order to gain
insight into selectivity.


Novel Insights Into Histamine H2 Receptor Biology,
John Del Valle and Ira Gantz, Am J Physiol
Gastrointest Liver Physiol 273:987-996, 1997.
A study of antagonist affinities for the human
histamine H2 receptor, JG Baker, British Journal of
Pharmacology (2008) 153, 1011–1021

Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors
and significance for drug discovery, Malin C.
Lagerström and Helgi B. Schiöth, Nature Reviews,
Volume 7 , April 2008

Caltech:
◦
◦
◦
◦

Professor Goddard
Ravi Abrol
Soo-Kyung Kim
Charlie Seto
SoCal Bioinformatics Research Institute:
◦ Core Instructors:
 Dr. Jamil Mommand, Dr. Sandra Sharp, Dr. Wendy Johnston
 Dr. Nancy Warter-Perez, Dr. Beverly Krilowicz
 Dr. Silvia Heubach, Dr. Jennifer Faust
◦ Program Coordinator: Ronnie Cheng
◦ All SocalBSI faculty and students

Funding:
◦ NSF, NIH, Economic and Workforce Development
Related documents