Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Computational Analysis of the Structure of Human Histamine 2 GPCR Presented by Alana Canfield William Goddard Ravi Abrol and Soo-Kyung Kim SoCalBSI Program August 21, 2008 GPCR : G-Protein Coupled Receptor H2 is a histamine receptor involved in gastric acid secretion in gastrointestinal system. Image courtesy of http://www.zmnh.uni-hamburg.de/schaller/gpcr.jpg Membrane proteins are involved in a large number of biological processes. ◦ Signal transduction pathways Lack of crystal structures makes computational approaches necessary. Structures are needed in therapeutic drug design. ◦ More than 50% of marketed drugs target GPCR’s Beta-2 Receptor Asp98 TM3 TM3 TM5 H2 Receptor: Optimize Asp98 Asp98 TM5 TM3 TM5 Individual Helices Determine transmembrane residues. Optimize helix kinks. Predict orientations of helices according to template crystal structure. Helix Bundle Determine helix orientations in space. Analyze final bundle structurally and energetically. Bundle+Ligand Add extracellular loops. Use final structure to dock various ligands. Analyze possible activation pathways. Transmembrane (TM) regions predicted using hydrophobicity profile and homology search. Hydrophobicity Value Hydrophobicity Plot 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.5 0 -0.5 0 100 200 -1 300 400 REGION CONSENSUS RESIDUES TM1 TM2 TM3 TM4 TM5 TM6 TM7 KITITVVLAVLILITVAGNVVVCLAV NCFIVSLAITDLLLGLLVLPFSAIYQLSCK NIYTSLDVMLCTASILNLFMISLD RVAISLVLIWVISITLSFLSIH EVYGLVDGLVTFYLPLLIMCITYYRIFK KATVTLAAVMGAFIICWFPYFTAFVYRGLR EAIVLWLGYANSALNPILYAALNR -1.5 Residue Number The ‘cap’ regions (helix ends) must carefully be considered. Transmembrane Region 7 H1 : H2 : H3 : H4 : FINAL: NEHLHMFTIWLGYINSTLNPLIYPLCNE NEVLEAIVLWLGYANSALNPILYAALNR PDYWYETSFWLLWANSAVNPVLYPLCHH KSVWYRIAFWLQWFNSFVNPLLYPLCHK EAIVLWLGYANSALNPILYAALNR Helices may have characteristic ‘kinks’. For individual helices, all residues except Pro, Gly, Thr, and Ser were alanized. ◦ This results in conformational sampling while maintaining the over helix character Kinked Helix Un-kinked Helix Bovine Rhodopsin AND Human Beta-2 Adrenergic Receptor Area AND Rawmid Minimum Energy AND Minimum RMSD Not Alanized Alanized De-alanize All De-alanize Raw The Energetic/Structure Story: Compare to Bovine Rhodopsin and Human Beta-2 Crystal Structures ‘2-3-4’-Similar Network NPxxY Region THR2.49 TYR7.53 ASP2.50 SER2.45 ASN7.49 ASN3.42 The Energetic/Chemical Structure Story: Many favorable inter-helical hydrogen bonds. Bond RMSD/AREA & Dealanize All RMSD/AREA & Dealanize Raw Asp186-Arg257 2.64 2.64 Cys102-Tyr250 3.33 3.32 Tyr94-Tyr78 3.32 3.24 Asp64-Tyr288 2.74 2.75 Asp64-Asn284 2.83 2.85 Tyr288-Asn284 2.98 4.06 Thr63-Asn108 2.73 2.73 Tyr278-Gln79 2.72 2.72 Ser59-Asn108 3.10 3.08 Ser59-Thr63 3.98 3.96 Cys246-Asn280 3.36 3.36 Ser105-Asp64 3.77 3.62 Asn108-Ser59 (#2) 2.96 2.97 The Energetic/Chemical Structure Story: Of the top energy structures, the two best structural results are: ◦ 1) RMSD analysis, ‘area’ midpoint, ‘all’ dealanization. Rotation Angles: 90-30-0-120-180-330-0 ◦ 2) RMSD analysis, ‘area’ midpoint, ‘raw’ dealanization. Rotation Angles: 90-30-0-120-180-330-0 Note that the rotation angles are the same! Further Structural Analysis - Homology: Asn1.50 and W4.50 Rotations: 90-30-0-120-180-330-0 Rotations: 300-30-0-30-180-330-0 THR2.49 TRP4.50 THR2.49 ASN3.42 ASN3.42 SER2.45 TRP4.50 SER2.45 Docking to four receptors: ◦ 1) Best energetic/chemical structure and 2) best homology-based structure. Both 1) and 2) : with and without rotamer optimization of Asp98. optimize Asp98 Asp98 Cimitidine (crystal) Clobenpropit ICL 162846 Tiotidine I am docking the ligand cimitidine. Final goals for group: Compare the four different histamine receptors in order to gain insight into selectivity. Novel Insights Into Histamine H2 Receptor Biology, John Del Valle and Ira Gantz, Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 273:987-996, 1997. A study of antagonist affinities for the human histamine H2 receptor, JG Baker, British Journal of Pharmacology (2008) 153, 1011–1021 Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery, Malin C. Lagerström and Helgi B. Schiöth, Nature Reviews, Volume 7 , April 2008 Caltech: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Professor Goddard Ravi Abrol Soo-Kyung Kim Charlie Seto SoCal Bioinformatics Research Institute: ◦ Core Instructors: Dr. Jamil Mommand, Dr. Sandra Sharp, Dr. Wendy Johnston Dr. Nancy Warter-Perez, Dr. Beverly Krilowicz Dr. Silvia Heubach, Dr. Jennifer Faust ◦ Program Coordinator: Ronnie Cheng ◦ All SocalBSI faculty and students Funding: ◦ NSF, NIH, Economic and Workforce Development