* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents Tariq Alzahrani Demonstrator College of Medicine King Saud University History • Before the early 20th century , intubation of the trachea had been described for conditions such as perioral tumours & laryngeal obstruction & often using fingers as a makeshift laryngoscope & without any pharmacological agents. • Insufflation of the trachea for the purpose of ether anaesthesia was introduced in 1909 in the USA & in 1912 in the UK. • Neuromuscular blocking drugs to aid tracheal intubation were first introduced into clinical practice in 1942 in the USA. • Before this , tracheal intubation was usually performed under deep inhalation anaesthesia with ether . Introduction • Before 1942 . • The continuing use of this technique to facilitate tracheal intubation with halothane & subsequently sevofluraue is still established , especially in paediatric practice . • Inhalation anaesthetics , induction agents , lidocain , opioids . • Indications . Inhalational agents Halothane & enflurane • MACEI . • 37 children , aged 2-6 yr , & found the MACEI of halothane is 1.4% & found by extrapolation that the MACEI value for 95% of that population was 1.9% . (Yakaitis 1977) • MACEI of enflurane is 2.9%. (Yakaitis1979) • For both halothane & enflurane , the MACEI appears to be about 30% greater than the MAC value . • Enflurane complications . (Lebwitz,Blitt,Dillon1972) Isoflurane & Desflurane Sevoflurane • Children . • Halothane largely superseded by sevoflurane in the UK since the mid to late 1990s . • 36 children aged 1-9ys were studied, laryngoscopy & intubation were attempted only after the ratio of alveolar to predetermined inspiratory % had been maintained at greater than 0.95 for 15 min. MACEI of sevoflurane is 2.7%. (Inomata, Watanabe,Taguchi,Okada 1994) • 29 children , aged 2-8ys , breathing circuit was saturated with sevoflurane 5%. The result showed that 80 & 100% of patients underwent smooth tracheal intubation at ETC of 4&4.5% respectively, & that the effective dose for 50% of the population (ED50 equivalent to the MACEI) was 3.1% . This is 0.3-0.4 higher than previously reported in a similar group of patients, presumably because of the different in the brain % as a result of a shorter intubation time. The time taken to reach an ETC of 4.5% & intubate averaged 210 s. (Inomata,Nishikawa 1996) • The addition of N2O 33 & 66% has been shown to decrease the MACEI value in children aged 17ys by 18 & 40% ,from 2.7% with sevoflurane alone , to 2.2% & 1.6% respectively. (Swan,Crawford,Stephens,Lerman 1999) • 64 healthy children aged 3-10ys , undergoing tonsillectomy : - Group I , received sevoflurane 8% & N2O 66% in O2 . - Group II , received propofol 3-4mg/kg &sux 2mg/kg . Both group were intubated at 150s by a blinded investigator . Excellent condition were scored in only 55% of group I & 82% in group II. (Thwaites,Edmends,Tomlinson,Kendall,Smith 1999) • 120 children aged 3-12yr,sevof. 8% in N2O 60% was compared with propofol/succinylcholine (3mg/kg & 1mg/kg) & propofol/alfemtanil (3mg/kg & 10μg/kg) . Patients in sevof. group were intubated after 3min, whilst the other groups were intubated after 60 s. Acceptable conditions were found in 97.5,87.5 &52.5% respectively. The mean ETC just before intubation was 4.2%.This agree with the previously quoted studies that an ETC of 2XMAC is required for successful intubation in almost all children. • Adult . • In 86 ASA I or II adult patients , the MACEI sevoflurane for 50% of the population was 4.5%. (Kimuru,Watanabe,Asakura,Inomata,Okada,Taguchi 1994) • The authors account for this difference by the irritation & subsequent coughing caused by the cuff of adult tracheal tube & the fact that children have a relatively greater brain perfusion & quicker uptake . • 120 adult patients: - Group I , received thiop. 5mg/kg & sux. 1mg/kg . - Group II , received sevof. 8% in N2O 66%. - Group I, were intubated at 1min & achieved almost 100% success rate with good or excellent condition . Group II ,breathed 3 V.C breaths in a primed circuit followed by 4min normal breathing to achieve almost the same result. (Imaroon,Pitimana,Prechawi,Anusit,Somcharoen,Caiyarroj 2001) • Pretreated agroup of 80 ASA I-II adult with fentanyl 1,2& 4 μg/kg given 4min before intubation , MACEI of sevof. of 2.07 , 1.45 & 1.37% respectively ,compared with 3.55% without fentanyl. (Katoh,Nakajima,Moriwaki 1999) Difficult airway • Sevoflurane has a lower blood gas solubility & is less likely to cause cardiac depression or arrhythmias than halothane. • These patients have been managed in one of two ways: 1. By increasing the inspired % of sevof. In a stepwise way. 2. High % induction. • Because of the relatively fast onset of sevof. ,some authors advise caution with its use in difficult airway , noting that speed of induction may not be desirable in some circumstances because of increased risk of respiratory depression . (Board 1998) (Davies 1996). lidocaine • Reported to be a useful I.V & topical adjunct to facilitate tracheal intubation , both on its own & with different short acting opioid ,in doses of 1-2 mg/kg . • In doses of 1mg/kg I.V lidocain has been shown to halve the dose of alfentanil or remifentanil needed to produce comparable intubating conditions. (Davidson,Gillespie 1993) (Wood,Grant,Harten,Nobel,Davidson 1998) • Several papers have also examined the effectiveness of I.V lidocain to suppress the cough reflex , optimum dose was 2mg/kg administered I.V at 1 min before intubation. (Yukioka,Yoshimoto,Nishimura,Fujimuri1985) • It dose not alter pressor response to laryngoscopy & tracheal intubation . (Hamill,Bedford,Weaver,Colohan 1981)(Laurito,Bangham,Becker,Polek,Regiler 1988) Induction agents • Thiopental , in 1948 , lewis described a series of 200 patients who received either a blind nasal or direct oral intubation after thiopental 500-750mg. There were 2 failures in the blind nasal group & 6 in the direct laryngoscopy group . He encountered severe problems with coughing, although the quality of overall intubating conditions was not specified as no scoring systems were used. • Propofol provides better jaw relaxation & attenuation of laryngeal reflexes than thiopental . (McKeating,Bali,Dundee 1988) • When used alone for tracheal intubation, 2.5mg/kg provided satisfactory condition in 96% patients & ideal intubating condition in 60% patients. (Keaveny,Knell 1988) Opioids fentanly • Has been shown to blunt the pressor to laryngosccopy & intubation optimally 5 min after administration. (Ko,Kim,Song 1998) • In a study of 60 ASA I or II children , fentanyl 3μg/kg given 5 min before propofol 3 mg/kg was the optimal dose regime & resulted in satisfactory intubating conditions in 75%of patients. (De Fatima,Da Silva,Poterio,Cremonesi 2001) Alfentanil • Alfentanil has been used successfully as an adjunct to blunt the pressor response . • Many studies done , it varies in design , type of premedication, dose of alfentanil (between 10 μg/kg & 50 μg/kg)& clinical end-point , making it difficult to decide on the best drug regimen. • Alfentanil has been used successfully in acase of a difficult airway after both fibreoptic intubation & deep inhalational anaesthesia with halothane had failed. (McDonald 1993) • The authors used alfentanil 25 μg/kg followed by propofol 1mg/kg to visualize the glottis, & stated that the effects of alfentanil could have been readily antagonized by naloxone if necessary. Remifentanil • Has a similar clinical onset time of alfentanil & has also been found to blunt the pressor response to tracheal intubation. • Many studies done , it veries in the timing of drug administration , study design & doses varying between 0.5 & 5μg/kg. • A rapid sequence induction using remifentanil has been described in a 12yr old child with a potentially difficult airway , after a gunshot wound & he had a family history of malignant hyperpyrexia . The patient received propofol 3 mg/kg & remifentanil 4μg/kg & underwent uneventful laryngoscopy & subsequent anaesthesia . (Haughton,Turley,Pollock 1999) Conclusions • The literature describes successful techniques to intubate the trachea without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents under G.A. • The technique offers a useful alternative when the neuromuscular blocking agents are either contraindicated or undesirable . • It is difficult to make any particular recommendation because clinical opinion is often based on personal experience & dose regimes may vary between clinicians. • Sevoflurane is best inhaled in a stepwise way , until the ETC is at least 2 x MAC . • The use of alfentanil & remifentanil to facilitate intubation of trachea is particularly helpful in paediatric ENT procedures (alfentanil 20μg/kg , remifentanil 2μg/kg). • The addition of lidocaine achieves better intubating condition mainly because of suppression of the cough reflex & adds little to ease of laryngoscopy or passage of a tracheal tube through the vocal cords. • Because of the diversity in study methods & interpretation of the quality of tracheal intubation, each technique & subsequent results must be interpreted within the clinical situation described.