Download Atrial Fibrillation – QOF Indicators

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Lifetrack Therapy wikipedia , lookup

Moral treatment wikipedia , lookup

Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup

History of psychiatric institutions wikipedia , lookup

Old Manor Hospital, Salisbury wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Atrial Fibrillation Project, SSNAP
July to September 2013 and QOF
Indicators 2012/2013
Eastbourne, Hailsham
and Seaford CCG
South East Coast SCN -Atrial Fibrillation Project
• Earlier detection and anticoagulation optimisation of patients with atrial
fibrillation
• First step will be agreement on recommendation of NICE anticoagulation
guidelines as best practice. New NICE Guidance will be published on the
11th June 2014
• Task to Finish Group being established to implement the NICE guidance
• Will be followed by the development of a best practice model for earlier
detection and management
• SSNAP Data – July to September 2013 most up to date
• QOF Data from 2012/13 most up to date
• Uses CHADS2 scoring. This will be replaced by CHADSVASC in NICE
Guidance
SSNAP Data – July to September 2013
• Nationally 19.8% of Stroke patients had previous AF. SEC is
20.5 %.Range in SEC is 12.7 to 35.5%
• Best practice is anticoagulant prescribing for AF
• Nationally 24.5% of Stroke patients with AF were not
previously prescribed anticoagulants or anti-platelets. SEC is
26.8%. Range is 7.7 % to 40%
• Nationally 32.5 % of Stroke patients with AF were previously
prescribed anticoagulants only. SEC is 31.4%. Range is 0 –
70%
SSNAP Data – July to September 2013
Admitted Stroke Patients with Previous AF
SSNAP - July to September 2013
AF Strokes = 306
40
35
30
%
25
20
15
10
5
0
Stroke Patients with Previous AF on no anticoagulant or anti-platelet
medication
SSNAP - July - September 2013
AF Strokes = 306
45
40
35
30
%
25
20
15
10
5
0
Stroke Patients with Previous AF- Prescribing prior to admission
SSNAP July to September 2013
AF Strokes = 306
Worthing Hospital
St Richards Hospital
East Surrey Hospital
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Medway Maritime Hospital
Tunbridge Wells Hospital
Maidstone District General Hospital
Frimley Park Hospital
%
Epsom Hospital
Anti-platelet only
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Anticoagulant Only
Conquest Hospital
Both
William Harvey Hospital
Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital
Kent and Canterbury Hospital
Darent Valley Hospital
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Princess Royal Hospital Haywards Heath
St Peter's Hospital
National
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
QOF Atrial Fibrillation Indicators – 2012/13 by
CCG
• Four Indicators
– Prevalence (percentage on QOF AF Register/practice population)
– AF05 – Percentage on AF register who have had a CHADS2 score in the previous 15
months (except those whose previous score was greater than 1)
– AF06 – In those with a CHADS2 score higher than 1 in last 15 months– those who are on
anti-coagulants or anti-platelets (minus exceptions)
– AF07 – In those with a CHADS2 score higher than 1 in last 15 months – those who are on
anti-coagulants (minus exceptions)
• Any correlation between QOF CCG indicator results and AF stroke
admissions and prescribing? E.g. High stroke admissions with AF in local
hospitals and low anticoagulant prescribing for those admissions and low
prevalence and low anticoagulant prescribing (for the known AF’s) in CCG
data
AF Prevalence by CCG in Sussex
SUSSEX
Percentage of people on practice list on atrial fibrillation register
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
Brighton & Hove
Source: QOF 2012/13
Coastal West Sussex
Practice
Crawley
KSS
England
Eastbourne,
Hailsham & Seaford
SUSSEX
Hastings & Rother
High Weald Lewes
Havens
Horsham & Mid
Sussex
AF05 by CCG in Sussex
SUSSEX
AF05 The percentage of patients with Atrial Fibrillation in whom stroke risk has been assessed using the
CHADS2 risk stratification scoring system in the preceding 15 months (excluding those whose previous
CHADS2 score is greater than 1)
98.0%
97.5%
97.0%
96.5%
96.0%
95.5%
95.0%
Brighton & Hove
Source: QOF 2012/13
Coastal West Sussex
Practice
Crawley
KSS
England
Eastbourne,
Hailsham & Seaford
SUSSEX
Hastings & Rother
High Weald Lewes
Havens
Horsham & Mid
Sussex
AF06 by CCG in Sussex
SUSSEX
AF06 In those patients with Atrial Fibrillation in whom there is a record of a CHADS2 score of 1 (latest in
the preceding 15 months), the percentage of patients who are currently treated with anti-coagulation
drug therapy or an anti-platelet therapy.
96.5%
96.0%
95.5%
95.0%
94.5%
94.0%
93.5%
93.0%
92.5%
92.0%
91.5%
91.0%
Brighton & Hove
Source: QOF 2012/13
Coastal West Sussex
Practice
KSS
Crawley
Eastbourne,
Hailsham & Seaford
England
SUSSEX
Hastings & Rother
High Weald Lewes
Havens
Horsham & Mid
Sussex
AF07 by CCG in Sussex
SUSSEX
AF07 In those patients with Atrial Fibrillation whose latest record of a CHADS2 score is greater than 1,
the percentage of patients who are currently treated with anti-coagulation drug therapy
86.0%
84.0%
82.0%
80.0%
78.0%
76.0%
74.0%
Brighton & Hove
Source: QOF 2012/13
Coastal West Sussex
Practice
KSS
Crawley
England
Eastbourne,
Hailsham & Seaford
SUSSEX
Hastings & Rother
High Weald Lewes
Havens
Horsham & Mid
Sussex
QOF Atrial Fibrillation Indicators – 2012/13 by Practice
• What to look for
– Does the prevalence look low for this practice population and demographics? All other
indicators are based on this. Low numbers may mean that some AF patients have not
been diagnosed
– AF05 – Low rates will indicate that the practice isn’t routinely assessing those on the AF
Register for CHADS2 and changes to their risk
– AF06 – Best practice is for those with identified AF to be on anticoagulant therapy not
anti-platelet therapy. Compare rates with AFO7. High rates on AF06 but lower rates on
AF07 indicates a high usage of anti-platelet therapy .
– AF07 - Best practice is for those with identified AF to be on anticoagulant therapy .
Compare with prevalence and AF05 - high rates but low prevalence and low routine
assessment may indicate that only small numbers are being managed well
GP Practice Codes in Eastbourne, Hailsham and
Seaford CCG
Y00080
DR ADOKI & PTNR
G81008
DR BAIG & PARTNERS
G81017
DR BARNES J D & PARTNERS
G81029
DR BARNES M H & PARTNERS
G81004
DR BEDFORD-TURNER & PARTNERS
G81027
DR BROWN G C & PARTNERS
G81049
DR BROWN R D & PARTNERS
G81098
DR EDWARDS & PARTNER
G81003
DR EYRE & PARTNERS
G81056
DR MILLER & PARTNERS
G81685
DR OEZBURUN
G81099
DR PALIT & PARTNERS
G81059
DR PEARCE & PARTNERS
G81012
DR SAVVAS S & PARTNER
G81634
DR SIMMONS
G81002
DR VERGHESE & PARTNERS
G81050
DR WILLIAMS & PARTNERS
Y02816
EASTBOURNE STATION HEALTH CENTRE
G81032
GREEN STREET CLINIC
G81104
PARK PRACTICE
G81022
SOVEREIGN PRACTICE
G81060
VICARAGE FIELD PRACTICE
Prevalence by Practice compared to KSS (Red line) and
England (Green Line)
NHS EASTBOURNE, HAILSHAM AND SEAFORD CCG
Percentage of people on practice list on atrial fibrillation register
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
Source: QOF 2012/13
Practice
KSS
AFO5 by Practice compared to KSS (Red line) and
England (Green Line)
NHS EASTBOURNE, HAILSHAM AND SEAFORD CCG
AF05 The percentage of patients with Atrial Fibrillation in whom stroke risk has been assessed using the CHADS2 risk
stratification scoring system in the preceding 15 months (excluding those whose previous CHADS2 score is greater than 1)
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Source: QOF 2012/13
Practice
KSS
AFO6 by Practice compared to KSS (Red line) and
England (Green Line)
NHS EASTBOURNE, HAILSHAM AND SEAFORD CCG
AF06 In those patients with Atrial Fibrillation in whom there is a record of a CHADS2 score of 1 (latest in the preceding 15
months), the percentage of patients who are currently treated with anti-coagulation drug therapy or an anti-platelet therapy.
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Source: QOF 2012/13
Practice
KSS
AFO7 by Practice compared to KSS (Red line) and
England (Green Line)
NHS EASTBOURNE, HAILSHAM AND SEAFORD CCG
AF07 In those patients with Atrial Fibrillation whose latest record of a CHADS2 score is greater than 1,
the percentage of patients who are currently treated with anti-coagulation drug therapy
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Source: QOF 2012/13
Practice
KSS