Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Mark Kimbrough VP, Investor Relations Chuck Hall President, North Florida Division 1 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements HCA’s management will be making some forward-looking statements during today’s presentation. Those forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause those forward looking statements to be materially incorrect. Certain of those risks and uncertainties are discussed in HCA’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company’s report on Form 10-K and its quarterly reports on form 10-Q, to which you are referred. Management cautions you not to rely on, and makes no promises to update any of the forward looking statements. 2 Collective Knowledge • 190,000 employees • 189 hospitals • 92 surgery centers • 14 million patients treated annually • 5.2 million emergency room visits annually 3 What Will Drive HCA’s Future Success • Located in Large, Growth Markets and Aging Population • Capital Investments • Quality Initiatives • Patient Safety • Prudent use of Company’s Strong Cash Flows 4 HCA Hospitals Located in Growth Markets Denver +9% Generally 25%-40% Market Share 40% of facilities in Texas & Florida Kansas City +5% U.K. Las Vegas +22% Switzerland Richmond +8% Southern California +9% Percent Growth in Market Population 2000-2005 Compared to the National Average of 4.5% Nashville +8% Austin +18% Panhandle +10% Houston +10% Dallas/Ft. Worth +12% 5 Dade +8% Tampa Bay +8% Palm Beach +11% Improving unemployment rate in mid-2003 implies mid-2005 rebound in admissions 4% 3% Unemployment Rate 5% 2% 1% 6% 0% 7% -1% -2% 8% 2 Year Lagged Correlation - R 2 of 0.74 since 1980 - R 2 of 0.66 since 1978 - R 2 of 0.48 since 1970 10% 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004YTD 9% Unemployment Rate Inpatient Admissions Growth Source: American Hospital Association, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Goldman Sachs Research estimates. 6 -3% -4% -5% -6% Inpatient Admissions Growth 4% 1.62% 3-Year CAGR Socio-Demographics—Age Wave Driving Healthcare Utilization 1.56% 3-Year CAGR Acute Care Utilization Index (2003=100) 125 1.59% 3-Year CAGR 1.58% 3-Year CAGR 121 119 120 1.6% 115 1.6% 113 115 1.6% 112 1.5% 110 1.6% 108 110 106 1.6% 105 103 105 102 100 98 100 97 96 95 1.7% 117 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% 7 Baby Boomer Impact Accelerates What Will Drive HCA’s Future Success • Capital Investments 8 Investments in Our Facilities • $7.6 billion in existing facilities since 2000 ($1.5 billion ’04) • $35,700 per bed annually • $130 million in information technology • $300 million in patient safety technologies since ’97 9 Distribution of Capital Dollars Remains Unchanged 2003 and beyond Ongoing Projects in Capital Plan ER Services 8%/$325 Land & Improvements 12%/$505M Outpatient Services/MOBs 11%/$480M Three Facilities 511 Beds 33 ER Expansions Open Heart, Cardiology Oncology, etc. 56 Facilities with Surgery and/or ICU/CCU expansions Surgery/Special Units 21%/$875M Replacement Facilities 10%/$420M New & Expanded Services 16%/$690M Three New Facilities 310 Beds 1,611 New Beds Represents $4.2B of projects 10 Beds 14%/$590M New Facilities 8%/$340M Outpatient Strategy Progressing Transactions totaling $62 million completed 20–30 imaging center and 8-10 surgery center transactions expected to be completed over the next 12 months Diversified Radiology (Denver) 4 imaging centers/fifth under construction Austin Radiology Assoc. 2 imaging centers Sarah Cannon Research Institute (Nashville) Thousand Oaks Diagnostic Imaging LAD Imaging Centers (Orange City, Deltona) Millcreek Imaging Center Salt Lake City, UT Total I Management, LLC Tampa Bay Area/5 imaging centers 11 HCA Surgery Centers What Will Drive HCA’s Future Success • Quality Initiatives 12 Our Recognition for Quality 13 Satisfied Physicians 90% HCA Physicians HCA physicians rank our facilities higher than that of other hospitals across the country 85% National Avg. 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% Source: Gallup Satisfaction Surveys 2003 14 Our Commitment to Quality HCA Quality Review System (QRS) An internal process that provides ongoing assurance that patient care services in HCA hospitals meet defined quality standards. 15 Our Commitment to Quality QRS surveys analyze clinical performance using: • JCAHO survey scores • Professional liability risk exposure • Patient, employee, and physician satisfaction results 16 Our Commitment to Quality QRS Measures Detail Report Section 1 QRS 2 (Page 2) QRS Measures MeasuresDetail DetailReport ReportSection Section 2 (Page 1) Percent of Potential Score Previous Actual Score Quality Standards (35) JCAHO Standards Survey Patient Safety (20) Overall Hosptial Mortality Index CABG Mortality/Complication/ALOS Index Disaster Readiness Adult ICU LOS More Than One Improvement Cardiac CathSchedule in Same Admission Rate Pt Safety Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Rate AMI Mortality Index Submission (Pre-Survey) *Bilateral CAP Oxygenation Assessment Cardiac Catheterization Rate Validation (Post-Survey)Rate AMIPneumoccocal Aspirin at Coverage Arrival ** CAP Vacination Screening Rate Adult ICU * AMI Aspirin at Discharge * CAP Smoking Cessation ED Length of Stay Counseling Rate * AMI ACEI for Lt Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Perinatal Nursing Fetal Monitoring Competency ** CAP Blood Culture before Antibiotic Rate AMI Beta Blocker at Arrival % Patient Arm Bands Scanned ** CAP Timing (% Cases with first dose under 4 hrs) AMIAntibiotic Beta Blocker at Discharge Experience Decubitus Ulcer NotLiability Present Onwithin Admission Rate * AMIProfessional Time to PCI (% Cases 120(5) hours) Frequency of Claims - Subtotal General/Medical Hosptial * AMI Time to Thrombolytic (% Cases(9) within 30 minutes) * AMI Smoking Counseling Rate Satisfaction SurveyLaceration Results (15) 3rd & 4th DegreeCessation Vaginal Index * HF Left Ventricular Function Assessment Rate Inpatient Satisfaction Operative VaginalOverall Delivery Rate * HF Smoking Cessation Counseling Rate Overall Satisfaction ObstetricsPhysician (2) * HF Discharge Instructions Provided Rate Employee Overall Satisfaction Rate Post-op Hemorrhage or Hematoma * HF ACE Inhibitor Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Rate ER Overall Satisfaction Post-op Hip Fracture Cardiovascular (16)Rate Post-op Pulmonary Embolism or DVT Rate Status Post-op 5 Sepsis - In theRate top 20th percentile of HCA hospitals Post-op Wound Rate 4 - In theDehiscence top 40th percentile of HCA hospitals Surgical3(5) - In the top 60th percentile of HCA hospitals Outcomes2Measures (25) 20th percentile of HCA hospitals - In the bottom Potential Score Music City Hospital % HCA Average % Previous Statiscallly QRS Subtotal / Previous Actual Statiscallly QRS Subtotal / Actual Measure Total Actual Significant 10.00 5 Actual Index / Significant Measure Total Index / Quintile Quintile Index / @ 90% 20.00 5 Index / Rate / @ 90% Quintile Quintile Rate / Ranking Rate / Confidence Ranking Rate / LOS Confidence Ranking Ranking 5.00 5 LOS Score Score LOS Interval LOS Interval Score Score 1.00 N 3.003.00 3 3.50 2.85 4 4.50 5.005.00 5 2.50% 0.89% 4.002.00 4 1.10 2.85 Y 3 99.20% 2.50% 90.20% 45.60% 87.50% 75.00% 93.00% 46.00% 57.40% 89.00% 35.80% 2.30% 90.00% 35.00% 1.00 25.20% 2.75% 40.00% 60.00% 0.89% 84.70% 0.15% 1.02% 0.01% 0.01% 25.00 1 - In the bottom 20th percentile of HCA hospitals 17 5.004.00 3.004.00 2.85 2 4.003.00 2.85 1 5.00 2.85 2 3.002.00 2.85 4 4.001.00 2.005.00 5.00 5 33.00 N 3.002.00 3.75 5 4.001.00 3.00 3.75 4 7.00 3.00 3.75 3 3.004.00 3.75 2 2.00 47.00 4.00 = Not applicable for5.00 this facility 4.00 = Not Surveyed for this facility 18.00 2.90 5 4 = Total not applicable 3 4 3 4.00 4 2 4 3 4 4.00 4 3 3.00 2 4 5 4 4.00 4 4.00 4 Status Medical Necessity Review Process Validated Current Weighted Score Status QRS Measures Measures Quality StandardsQRS Survey Current Actual Score Status QRS Measures 3 5 2 4 4 3 5 2 1 5 2 1 3 3 4 3 What Will Drive HCA’s Future Success • Patient Safety 18 Our Commitment to Patient Safety HCA Has Invested Over $300 Million In Patient Safety Technologies Since ’97 19 Our Commitment to Patient Safety eMAR & Barcoding Ensures the five “R’s” – right patient, right medication, right dose, right time, right route of administration The benefit to our patients… Prevents the error patients fear most … getting the wrong medication 20 Our Commitment to Patient Safety Electronic Provider Order Management (ePOM) Allows physicians to input prescriptions and patient orders electronically and transmit them directly to a pharmacy or hospital department The benefit to our patients… Eliminates the risk of a pharmacist or clinician misreading a physician’s handwriting 21 Our Commitment to Patient Safety ePOM - Safety Alerts Drug allergies Dose warnings Duplicate orders Abnormal results Severe drug interactions Common test interactions Age limits for certain drugs 22 Addressing Medication Errors (ADES) 6% 4% eMAR & Barcoding ePOM Ordering Administration Transcription 34% 56% Bates DW et al. Incidence of adverse drug events, potential adverse drug events. JAMA 1995;274:29-34. 23 Dispensing What Will Drive HCA’s Future Success • Prudent use of Company’s Strong Cash Flows 24 Cash flow in 2004 Remains Positive Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities1 Dollars in Millions $3,500 $2,786 $2,822 $3,049 $2,046 $1,584 $1,301 8.0% $0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Excluding settlements with government agencies and investigation related costs. 1: 1999-2003 are non-GAAP numbers 25 Capital Reinvestment $1.5B in 2004 Share Repurchase Program $10.0B in 8 years $2.5B “Dutch Auction” completed at $39.76 in Fourth Quarter 2004 New Dividend Policy $250mm annually $7.5 Billion Share Repurchase 249 Million Shares 1 2004 38% of outstanding shares $3.1B: 77.4 Shares Average Price: $30.20 2003 $1.1B: 31.1M Shares $282M: 6.2M Shares 2002 2001 $706M: 19.2M Shares 2000 $1.3B: 43.5M Shares 650M Shares 12/31/96 423M Shares 12/31/04 2 $1.4B: 55.6M Shares Impact of Tender Offer 1999 $1.4B: 55.6M Shares $10 Billion $930M: 41MShares Shares $930M: 41M 312 Million Shares 1998 Average Price: $32.13 37.9M Shares $1.3B: 37.9M Shares 1997 $1.3B: 1: 2004 purchases through 12/31/04 2: Includes other activities affecting share balance (stock option exercises, restricted grants, and ESPP activity). 26 In Summary We Have…. Great Assets Excellent Investment Opportunities Strong Cash Flows Excellent Long-Term Earnings Growth Outlook Prudent Financial Strategy Focused on Shareholder Value 27