Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Overcoming Antibody Barriers in Renal Transplantation Reference: Montgomery MA. Renal transplantation across HLA and ABO antibody barriers: Integrating paired donation into desensitization protocols. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:449–457. • All patients in need of renal transplantation face the crisis of organ availability, particularly, those who are disadvantaged by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization or hard-to-match blood types and will have to wait for prolonged periods. • At present, there are three options available to patients who have an incompatible live donor—desensitization, kidney paired donation (KPD) and a combination of the two modalities. • Figure 1 outlines a transplant modality algorithm that takes into account the clinical phenotypes that are likely to benefit from the different options. Desensitization • Two desensitization protocols have demonstrated clinical efficacy—Plasmapheresis (or immunoadsorption) and highdose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) with low-dose IVIg (PP/IVIg). • Within days of discontinuing plasmapheresis, the anti-HLA antibody rebounds whereas the transplantation benefit of high-dose IVIg can continue for several months after the drug is administered. • However, both the protocols are designed to lower donorspecific alloantibody (DSA) strength to a level that is safe for transplantation; besides the immunoregulartory mechanisms can promote maintenance of reduced antibody reactivity following preconditioning and transplantation. High-Dose IVIg • Similar protocols exist for both live and deceased donor transplants. • The protocol consists of monthly infusions of 2 g/kg IVIg until either the crossmatch is deemed safe or a total of four doses are administered. • The Mayo group, after performing a head-tohead comparison between a single high-dose of IVIg and PP/IVIg in live donor recipients, reported that PP/IVIg was more effective in abrogating a positive crossmatch particularly when the strength of the crossmatch was higher. PP/IVIg • Effective reduction of HLA antibody and isohemagglutinin via plasmapheresis helps in the preparation for an incompatible live donor transplant (see Fig. 2). • After transplantation, at least two PP/IVIg sessions are performed, beyond which the duration of treatment is predicated by DSA levels. • Low-dose IVIg (100 mg/kg) serves to reduce the synthesis and release of endogenous antibody that occurs after plasma exchange otherwise it can have immunomodulatory effects similar to highdose protocols. • Anti-CD20 has been used selectively in patients with high-risk donor/recipient phenotypes (combined ABOi and +XM, high XM starting titer, multiple DSAs and multiple repeat mismatches). Kidney Paired Donation • Currently, computer modeling and mathematical algorithms have helped to simulate incompatible donor pools. • When compared to the general donor/recipient population, incompatible pools contain a dramatic blood type skewing towards a greater percentage of hard-to-match O recipients and fewer valuable O donors. • However, several of the hard-to-match patients who are less likely to find matches can be considered for desensitization. KPD versus Desensitization • Two important questions can help to determine the best option for an individual pair; they are (1) how difficult will they be to match in a KPD? and (2) how difficult will they be to desensitize? • The first question can be addressed using mathematical simulations to impute the probability of matching in a KPD based on the donor blood type, recipient blood type, degree of sensitization and the size of the KPD pool (see Table 1). KPD versus Desensitization • Once the immunologic profile of the donor/recipient has been determined, it becomes possible to predict who will be either difficult-todesensitize or at risk for antibody-mediated acute rejection (AMR). • The strength of the recipient’s antibody reactivity to the donor in positive crossmatch patients is a good predictor of the length of the desensitization therapy as well as the risk of AMR after the transplant. • Broadly sensitized patients will have variable strengths of antibody reactivity against different HLA molecules. • Very broadly sensitized patients with high HLA reactivity that are both difficult-to-match and difficult-to-desensitize can be transplanted by combining KPD and desensitization (see Fig. 1C). • Figure 3 reveals that this can be accomplished by raising the threshold for the antibody strength that defines unacceptable antigens and then search the KPD database for genotypes that would permit a positive crossmatch with a low strength. Conclusion • Several different interventions with proven efficacy exist that can be used to avoid or confront antibody incompatibilities. • Considering the strengths and limitations of these interventions can help to apply a more rational application of therapeutic modalities that have the potential to add several thousand additional transplants each year.