Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Guideline Development: Issues for Primary Care Dr Barry Miller Consultant in Pain Medicine & Anaesthesia Royal Bolton Hospital Pain Facts from the RCGP commissioning guide (draft) The easy bit !! Pain is one of the world’s most common symptoms Chronic pain appears to be more common now than it was 40 years ago, and as detailed within the Health survey for England 2011 affects more than 14 million people ➲ Chronic pain has a major impact on people’s lives, causing sleeplessness and depression and interfering with normal physical and social functioning. ➲ It has been estimated that back pain alone costs the economy £12.3 billion per year. The cost of pain from all causes is far higher. ➲ The limited number of specialist pain clinics around the country are inundated with referrals, and only 14% of people with pain have seen a pain specialist. Systems and infrastructure are not adequate to meet need or demand. ➲ Better coordination of services and services designed around the patient’s needs are essential. ➲ ➲ Implications Easy implications !! Pain, not appropriately managed, results in: ➲ ➲ ➲ ➲ ➲ ➲ avoidable visits to GP’s avoidable steps and delays in a patient pathway avoidable A&E attendances avoidable emergency admissions multiple visits to hospital high analgesia cost ➲ ➲ Poor quality of life for patients Duplication and the generation of waste within the system. How to approach the problem in a commissioning framework ➲ Seeing pain as a separate service rather than as an add on to others ➲ Commissioning pain services using a chronic disease model ➲ Supporting providers in increasing productivity ➲ The development of integrated care pathways and service models ➲ Looking at the best possible outcome for the majority of its population by following best practice This model will not work if : [] Chronic Pain is viewed as a ‘quick fix’ by the Any Qualified Provider (AQP) agenda, or [] As an entity that can be managed by managing other diseases Managing these patients alone is fraught with pitfalls Starting place ➲ There are five 'pain issues' to consider: ● Initial assessment and early management of pain ● Spinal pain ● Chronic widespread pain, including fibromyalgia ● Neuropathic Pain ● Pelvic Pain (male & female) Diagnosis ➲ Consider this a 'label' to direct therapy/referral ● ● ● Cauda Equina >>>>> Neurosurgery Joint Pain >>>> Rheumatology Low Back Pain >>>>> ?????? • • ➲ It is important to recognise the process of labelling • ➲ Is it a 'diagnosis' ? (Hint: YES) For good or bad Investigate to include/exclude the healthcare options • Not an end in itself How to approach ➲ Remember what healthcare provides ● Surgery ● Injections ● Medicines / Tablets / Creams ● Physiotherapy ● Coping Strategies ● Alternative approaches Consider 'Low Back Pain' ➲ ➲ ➲ ➲ ➲ Probably the most complicated pathology in modern medicine The interaction of muscle, tendon, ligament, joint and bone is poorly understood We have no meaningful means of assessing 'function' or 'dysfunction' We have simple blood tests to diagnose destructive disease processes e.g. Rheumatoid We have crude static imaging to see a 'one time' snapshot of misalignment / fracture / etc Managing Low Back Pain ➲ Where to begin when patient first attends ➲ How to manage initially – for the many who will improve spontaneously and rapidly ➲ How to recognise the risk factors for chronicity ➲ How to manage the intermediate phase ➲ Where to go after that Where to find the answer Low Back Pain ➲ NICE guidelines Low Back pain (excluding Sciatica) ● Less than one year ● ➲ Map of Medicines ● Pain of Spinal origin ● ● ➲ (British Pain Society & NHS England’s Clinical Reference Group for Pain) Includes NICE approach Other guidelines ● e.g. Forthcoming SIGN guidelines Guideline Development ➲ Diagnosis of 'acute' (simple) low back pain Red flags and radicular signs not present ● ➲ Very early phase Analgesia ● Simple Paracetamol / NSAIS+PPI / Minor Opioids ● ● Advice regarding the management of side effects (esp. GI, constipation) 'Active' advice – verbal & written ● Evidence suggests this has little impact ● StarT tool ● 'Physiotherapy' – simplified Pain Management event ● ● ● Advice, reassurance, written advice – both on exercise and local facilities – Low risk discharged Medium + High risk ● Greater Physiotherapy intervention Where next ? All patients should have basic work with specialist physiotherapists (in the management and risks of Low Back pain) Not all physiotherapists can provide this Guidance, Reassurance, Q&A Failure to educate and reassure early on is a key marker of chronicity Moderate & High ‘risk’ STarT scorers need additional input. Additional Pharmacology • Consider what the aim is ? • Is this part of a rehabilitative, maintenance or holding strategy • What drugs? • TCAs • sedative at low dose (10-50mg) • Analgesic (for neuropathic components) at higher doses (50-100mg) • Side Effects – don’t underestimate patient concerns about being labelled as ‘depressive’ • Gabapentinoids • Strong Opioids Where Next ? • Specialist Diagnostic / Physiotherapy services – • • • Musculoskeletal CATS Set up to consider non-acute diagnostics Surgical assessment Advanced Physiotherapy • • Acute and Sub-acute management Later management of some chronicity risks And then…… • Pain Management Service (us!) • Managing ‘chronicity’ • Pharmacology – Drug combinations/doses/'outside the BNF' – Diagnostic, rehabilitative, maintenance • • Individual medium/long term work Physiotherapy – Active management models, incl. CBT Psychology – e.g. CBT, Mindfullness, Acceptance, etc Nursing Pain Management Programme – Gold Standard Rehabilitative approach • Interventions • 'Pain Management' • • •