Download Argentina

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Recession wikipedia , lookup

Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup

Foreign-exchange reserves wikipedia , lookup

Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup

Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup

Balance of payments wikipedia , lookup

Interest rate wikipedia , lookup

Government debt wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Angel Munoz
Kolby Patrick






History
Threats
The Crisis
IMF Intervention
Critiques
Q&A

1983 – Raul Alfonsin becomes president
◦ Inherits Huge Debt from Predecessor
◦ Prints Money to pay off debt – Inflation ↑

1991 – Carlos Menem Assumes Power
◦ Chief Economist, Domingo Cavallo, recommends a
fixed exchange rate to stifle hyperinflation
◦ Recommends Privatization of many industries

1995 – Establishment of MERCOSUR
◦ A common market between Argentina, Brazil,
Paraguay and Uruguay
◦ Aimed To Eliminate Tariffs between the nations

Fixed Exchange Rate
◦ Halts Hyperinflation
◦ Encourages Imports

Privatization
◦ Decreases Government Deficits
◦ Decreases Public Debt

MERCOSUR
◦ Increases Exports

U.S. Dollar Appreciation
◦ Exports becoming more expensive
◦ Exports Decline

Brazil Devalues the real
◦ Brazilian Exports more attractive and less expensive
◦ Argentinean Exports decline further
◦ Current Account Falls into deeper Deficit

Capital Account dwindling
◦ Foreign Direct Investment Decreases
◦ High debt to defend Fixed Exchange Rate
◦ Argentina Fails To Pay Interest on its Debt

Capital Account falls.

Argentina Uses Foreign Reserves to pay debts

Fernando de la Rua replaces Carlos Menem
◦ Forces businesses to raise prices to increase tax
revenue
◦ Businesses fail because of added costs
◦ Tax Revenues Decline

Early 2001 - Public Debt = 50% of GDP

GDP Drops 3%

Late 2001 – Public Debt = 60% of GDP
10
6.062712435
5
4.291509811
1.369476632
0
Real GDP % Change
-5
-4.803435117
-6.033775263
-6.449960277
-10
-12.67826738
-15
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003






Gross Domestic Product – Down 6.03%
Government Deficit – 4.5%
Total Economic Activity – Down 18%
Construction – Down 36%
Imports – Down 50%
Tax Revenue – Down 17%

Devaluation Fears
◦ Run on the Banks
 $3.6 Billion Withdrawn
 6% of Deposit Base Withdrawn in 2 Days
 Deposits fell from $85B to $15B by July 2002

Government imposed a freeze on withdrawals
◦ Riots ensued
◦ 20 Dead

Removal of US$ Peg, Devaluation of the Peso

Reduction of Government Spending
◦ Public Sector Wages dropped 13%

Raised Interest Rates

Unrealistic Forecasts
◦ 2001 Real GDP growth was forecasted to be +3.5%
◦ Actual Real GDP declined by over 6%
◦ Were not able to assess severity of the situation

Oversight of Fixed Exchange Rate
◦ Should not have been permanent

Debt Management
◦ Borrowed at higher interest rates than economic
growth rates
◦ Continued Borrowing when it did not have funds to
pay interest on existing debt

Lending Policy
◦ Must have standards for loans
◦ Must not encourage moral hazard