* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Steady-state economy wikipedia , lookup
Gross domestic product wikipedia , lookup
Miracle of Chile wikipedia , lookup
Economic growth wikipedia , lookup
Chinese economic reform wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Innovation and Growth in LAC: The Next Generation of Reforms William F. Maloney Office of the Chief Economist, LA, World Bank Why Innovation Push Now? Ongoing work WBI: knowledge economy studies HD: higher education projects FPSI: E-gov, E-Bus. Region- Preoccupation with slowed growth Regional Flagships: From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy… Why did LAC’s natural resources sectors underperform Scandinavia, Australia- Lack of innovative capacity Closing the Gaps in Education and Technology-takes a closer look TFP growth faster in agriculture than manufacturing. Half of Growth is Total Factor Productivity TFP growth (1967-1992) 8 France 6 Denmark Italy Sweden Austria 4 Agriculture Turkey Venezuela Average developed countries Japan Tunisia Greece Colombia Chile Canada South Africa UK Kenya Pakistan Sri Lanka 2 India Indonesia Finland Korea Taiwan Philipines Netherlands Peru El Salvador Egypt USA Australia Jamaica Sample Average 0 -6 -4 -2 0 -2 Trinidad & Tobago 2 Average developing countries Costa Rica -4 Manufacturing 4 6 8 LAC- way below R&D Superstars R&D GDP GDP 1 2 GDP CAP CAP 2 5.0% Predicted & Observed R&D/GDP 4.5% 4.0% Israel 3.5% Finland 3.0% 2.5% Korea 2.0% 1.5% China 1.0% India 0.5% Argentina Mexico 0.0% 4 5 6 7 8 Log GDP per Capita 9 10 11 LAC’s efficiency of converting R & D into patents,TFP is also low Patents = B1R&D + Bp country*R&D 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% -5.00% -10.00% NOR FIN ISR KOR TWN VEN URY PER MEX CRI COL CHL BRA 0.00% ARG 5.00% National Innovation System Global Knowledge Economy Human Capital Think Tanks/ Antenna University Innovation Clusters Firms Innovation & TFP Growth Other Public Policies: Rules of the Game Infrastructure (ICT) Subsidies/Tax incentives Coordination Initiatives Global Knowledge Economy Why is LAC not Finland? The challenge ahead Weak human capital Not addressing serious mkt failures in innovation Few incentives to R & D - tax breaks, subsidies Weak efforts to help firms learn Incubators, research parks, consortia Disfunctional NIS: LAC’s NIS-closer to the Holy Roman Empire than Finland. No mkt forces assure elements of NIS work together Missing supporting markets-credit, labor The Bank’s Challenge Hippocratic Oath- “First do no harm” Mkt failures- last refuge of the interventionist scoundrel Innovation: the Trojan horse of state discipline? Bad incentives, institutions already implemented that will be hard to reform- U’s, public labs Commit to a long dialogue Know what we’re talking about! Down to policy details Do/sponsor the LDC research necessary and.. Get our models right: What’s a knowledge economy anyway? What the heck is high tech? Who Should LAC follow? Deviations from expected level 2 0.10 2 FINLANDIA 0.10 COREA Finland Korea 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 -1 -0.05 -1 -0.05 -2 -0.10 -2 -0.10 1972 IED FDI 1977 1982 I+D R&D 1987 1992 1998 1972 LICENCIAS PAGADAS AL EXT. License Payments 1977 1982 1987 1992 1998 CRECIMIENTO PER CAPITA (eje derech Fuente: Maloney (2004) But Spain, Italy and Portugal follow a different path. 2 0.10 2 0.10 ESPAÑA CHILE Chile Spain 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 -1 -0.05 -1 -0.05 -2 -0.10 -2 -0.10 1972 IED FDI 1977 1982 I+D R&D 1987 1992 1998 LICENCIAS PAGADAS AL EXT. License Payments 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1998 CRECIMIENTO PER CAPITA (eje derecho) FIN