Download Oil Security 2025

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

1973 oil crisis wikipedia , lookup

2000s energy crisis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
NS4054
Fall Term 2015
Oil Security 2025
Overview I
• Commission on Energy and Geopolitics, Oil Security
2025, 2015
• As late as 2010 U.S. looking to be increasingly oil import
dependent
• Would have had major repercussions
• Exposed to physical supply shocks
• Meant that US would remain heavily engaged in regional
politics in major oil producing regions
• Protecting critical energy infrastructure, and
• Guaranteeing free flow of oil supplies
•
2
Overview II
• Today U.S. oil outlook has been dramatically altered
• Recent events have shattered conventional wisdom and
altered many long held beliefs concerning
• Developments in domestic energy markets, and
• Innovative technological change
• High oil prices and improvements in drilling technology
have helped unlock massive light, tight oil (LTO)
resources in North Dakota, Texas and elsewhere
• Before recent oil price drop
• U.S. crude output expected to increase to 8.5mbd in 2015 up
from 5mbd in 2008
• Shale boom expected to last for more than a decade
3
Overview III
• At same time various demographic, economic, and policy
factors have resulted in
• U.S. net liquid fuel imports declining by 50% from 2005 high –
decline of more than 6mbd
• In 2011 U.S. actually became net exporter of refined
petroleum products – first time since 1948, and expected
to continue
• Would have exported crude if ban not in place
• Changes likely to have profound consequences for U.S.
4
Overview IV
5
Overview V
• Domestic energy abundance will have many impacts
• As net imports fall country is retaining a substantial quantity of
capital that would ordinarily been sent abroad
• Glut of natural gas liquids has dampened prices increasing real
incomes
• Lower energy prices increases competitiveness of domestic
manufacturing
• Stimulates billions of dollars of new investment in petrochemicals
• Rapid expansion in drilling activity has directly created tens of
thousands of jobs and many more indirectly
6
Overview IV
• National security, foreign policy and geopolitical impacts
of U.S. energy abundance more subtle and less
understood
• Major changes are expected in global economics, and
• Regional security dynamics, particularly in the Middle
East and North Africa (MENA) – with benefits for U.S.
• Some effects just speculation at this point
• U.S. could disengage militarily from volatile oil producing regions
• Less opportunities for free-riding of other consuming countries
• Larger security role for high energy importing countries like
China and India
7
Overview VII
• Can say with more certainty that
• Many long term U.S. oil suppliers such as Algeria, Angola and
Nigeria have already begun to develop new markets as U.S.
demand for their oil falls
• Costs of transitioning to new markets along with lower revenues
could have important social, political and economic impacts on
these and other countries.
• Concern over the fact that U.S. will need to balance a
combination of sometimes competing interests –
diplomatic, military and economic
• At present we do not have a framework for examining
likely possibilities – represents a major gap in our longterm policy planning.
8
Overview VIII
• To overcome this limitation, report develops a scenariobased analysis through 2025
• Aimed to help explore likely impacts of rising U.S. oil
production on countries and regions around world
specifically
• Middle East and North Africa
• Sub-Saharan Africa,
• Russia and
• China
• We will look at these forecasts when we get to each
section
9
Oil in the U.S. Economy I
• Oil derives its strategic significant from its role in the U.S.
economy and transportation sector in particular
• Petroleum fuels account for about 37% primary energy demand
• More than any other fuel
• Significant decline from 1977 when represented 47% primary
energy demand
• Transportation sector accounted for around 70% of total U.S. oil
demand
• Total cost of petroleum fuels consumed in U.S. ranged
from $300 billion to $900 billion over the past four
decades
• Amounts to between 2.6 and 8.5% GDP
• Last five years averaged about $840 billion or about 5.5% of
GDP
10
Oil in the U.S. Economy II
11
Oil Markets I
• Due to heavy reliance on oil, American consumers and
businesses are fully exposed to oil prices
• Few opportunities to choose less costly alternatives in
the short run – demand is price inelastic
• If oil prices jump, consumers divert expenditures away
from other items – can cause a recession
• Oil prices are a function of global supply and demand
• Oil very fungible and relatively easy to ship
• Essentially a single global market for oil
• Prices set in open commodity markets
• Means prices affected by events in oil producing and oil
consuming countries
• Can even be significantly impacted by events in
countries that are neither large oil consumers nor
producers
12
Oil Markets II
• Oil related crisis have arisen from either:
• Supply side shocks as 1973-73 OPEC oil embargo, or
• Demand side shocks – 2002-2008 rapid growth in increasing
imports from 2.3 mbd to 10.2 mbd
• As important as demand growth in last decade wrong to
conclude supply side factors currently unimportant in
determining global oil prices
• At a fundamental level concerns about long-term
availability of global oil supplies reinforces market’s
perception that rapid demand growth will be
unsustainable
• In part concerns about supply side growth originate from
fact that nearly 80% of worlds proven plus probable
reserves held by national oil companies (NOCs)
• Chokepoints always a potential threat to supplies
13
Oil Supply Chokepoints
14
Oil Markets III
• NOCs often forced to deposit production revenues into
treasury where diverted to other purposes
• Leads to underinvestment in some of world’s lowest cost,
most accessible reserves
• No real free market for oil in the pure competition sense
• The OPEC cartel and spare capacity
• Simple gauge of supply-demand balance in global market
at any point in time is level of spare production capacity
in OPEC countries
• As a cartel OPEC maintains individual member
production quotas that vary depending on
• Current global economic climate, and
• Geopolitical considerations
15
Oil Markets IV
• Adherence to individual quotas is not always strong
• OPEC production capacity typically exceeds combined
output of members – much of surplus at any time in
Saudi Arabia
• Spare capacity allows market manipulation but also
useful– provides short term buffer in event on
unexpected supply disruptions or demand surges
• Rule of thumb – markets comfortable when OPEC spare
capacity is equivalent to four percent of global demand
• In 2000 about that level
• Starting in 2003 spare capacity reduced
• Worker strike Venezuela
• Hostilities in Iraq
• Fell below one percent in 2003-04 when prices started to
16
climb
Oil Markets V
• 2007-09 global economic recession and financial crisis
ultimately brought reduced oil demand, lower prices and
high levels of OPEC spare capacity
• Strong global recovery in 2010 – especially in China
caused oil prices to increase by 12.7%
• Arab Spring and supply disruptions brought return of
sharply higher prices in 2011
• Though 2012-13,
• Ongoing challenges to Libyan oil production and export
• International sanctions that removed Iranian oil from market
• Growing unrest in Iraq that affected output and
• Host of issues in Nigeria that contributed to an additional sharp
decline in OPEC spare capacity which was just 1.8% of global
demand in Q3 2013
17
Oil Markets VI
• Various entities on supply-side have extremely different
motivations and incentives that drive their decision
making
• In case of many OPEC members, little incentive to overbuild spare capacity that sits idle majority of the time just
as means to keep markets calm.
• Over the long-term even Saudi Arabia considers the
anticipated effects of investment levels in other global
regions wihen making decisions about its own capacity
• In general the oil industries in OPEC mambers do not
function as profit maximizing firms seeking to expand
market share
• Instead investment levels determined in part to achieve
specified price targets
• Around $100 per barrel going into 2014
18
Oil Markets VII
• Price and spending targets driven by urgent need to
maintain generous domestic spending programs to
placate restive populations.
• Concludes that if OPEC adheres to its historical pattern,
members will view developments such as rising nonOPEC production as signals to forestall investments in
new production capacity, tighten quotas and keep the
global balance tight
• In fact IEA has been warning of a looming global supply
crunch by end of decade due to pattern of
underinvestment in Middle East oil production capacity
• As will see Saudis actually increased production and
investment – want to drive shale out of business and
become central player in oil
19
Oil Markets VIII
20
Oil Markets IX
21
Oil Markets X
22
Oil Markets XI
23
U.S. Military and Oil Dependence I
• Throughout 20th century and into the 21st, U.S. only
country with the capacity to protect energy infrastructure
and supply routes around the globe.
• This capacity combined with critical importance of oil to
U.S. economy has forced the country to accept the
burden of securing world’s oil supply
• Engagement comes at an expense
• Rand study placed cost of this defense burden between $67.5
billion and $83 billion annually, plus an additional $8 billion in
military operations.
• Means that between 12 and 15% of defense budget devoted to
guaranteeing free flow of oil
24
U.S. Military and Oil Dependence II
• Fuel consumption by military has also increased
substantially over time
• Between the Vietnam War and the 21st century conflicts in Iraq
and Afghanistan a 175% increase in fuel used per soldier per
day – annual growth of 2.6% over 40 years.
• In 2011 DOD spent $17.5 billion on fuel for vehicles and
equipment up from $4.6 billion in 2005
• Stranglehold oil has on U.S. and global economies has
also undermined country’s ability to deal with difficult
foreign policy challenges
• Strong case can be made that effective implementation of
sanctions on the Iranian oil industry were undermined by
impact such sanctions would have had on oil prices –
and therefore economies of major oil consumers.
25
U.S. Military and Oil Dependence III
• Another example – Syria Q3 2013
• Syrian government accused of using chemical weapons
• President and advisors debated over conducting military
strike on get government tares
• Price of oil rose from around $102 to $116 from June to
August
• Possibility of further upward price pressure and resulting
effect on continued economic recovery became important
consideration
• Even prompted discussion about release of oil from the
U.S. Strategic Petroleum reserve
• Notable that this price impact and discussions occurred
despite Syria’s oil production less than 0.1% world
supplies and zero U.S. imports
26
Scenarios Overview
• Scenarios comprise combination of low and high cases
for global oil demand and global oil supply
• Allows rising U.S. production to be analyzed within
appropriate context of a global oil market
• Group of “wildcards” – difficult to predict developments
could have a significant impact on either global oil
supply demand
• Based on scenarios report makes recommendations that
aim to better position the U.S. in the future
• Want to see how to
• Strengthen the country’s capability to minimize global oil supply
disruptions
• Enhance its resiliency in face of any such disruptions and
• Bolster response capabilities
27
Scenarios – Assumptions I
• Four scenarios are developed to assess potential impacts
of global oil demand and supply dynamics on regional
and country economies
• By considering different possible trends in global oil
demand and supply, scenarios provide
• Framework for assessing range of potential geopolitical impacts
of U.S. oil abundance and
• What they mean for national security and foreign policy
• Help structure discussion for possible policy actions
28
Scenarios – Assumptions II
29
Scenarios: Results I
30
Scenarios Results II
31
Scenarios Results III
32
33
Scenario A I
34
Scenario A II
35
Scenario B I
36
Scenario B II
37
Scenario C I
38
Scenario C II
39
Scenario D I
40
Scenario D II
41
OPEC Spare Capacity
42
Price Movements
43
Production Costs
44
Scenarios – Summary
45