Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Diversifying PRSP The Vietnamese Model for Growth-Oriented Poverty Reduction September 1, 2002 Izumi Ohno National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies Background • Ongoing global poverty reduction partnership • Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) – Eligibility for Enhanced HIPC Initiative, IDA/IMF financial support – Linkage with country assistance strategies – The means to achieve UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Japan and PRSP • Agree on basic principles of PRSP (e.g., ownership, partnership); but • Suggested areas for its enhancement: – Incorporating country diversity in the current approach – Providing strategic alternatives and options for institutional arrangements, etc. Agenda 1. PRSP Overview 2. Country Types and Appropriate Responses 3. Vietnam’s PRSP Experience: – Strong ownership: built on the existing development vision – Growth orientation: Asian Dynamism as key factor 1. PRSP Country Status • 61 countries engaged in PRSP process [as of Aug. 2002] – 18 countries completed Full-PRSPs o/w: 12 Africa, 4 LAC o/w: 15 linked to “Enhanced HIPC Initiative” • IDA/IMF comprehensive review – Joint Development Committee (April 2002) PRPS Countries by Progress No. of countries Africa (35) East Asia (6) South Asia (4) Europe & Central Asia (10) Middle East & North Africa (2) Latin America & Caribbean (4) 11 1 3 1 3 1 17 7 2 7 2 Full-PRSP 1 1 Interim-PRSP 4 before Interim-PRSP PRSP Countries by HIPC Status No. of Countries 5 Africa (35) East Asia (6) 1 1 South Asia (4) 17 7 2 4 4 HIPC Completion Points reached 4 HIPC Decision Points reached Europe & Central Asia (10) Middle East & North Africa (2) Latin America & Caribbean (4) 10 HIPC Decision Points not yet reached HIPC Sustainable Cases 1 1 Non-HIPC 1 3 PRSP Comprehensive Review: by IDA and IMF “The PRSP approach requires flexibility so that both the process and the content of poverty reduction strategies can vary across countries in light of national circumstances.” [IDA/IMF March 15, 2002, p.7] 2. Country Types and Appropriate Responses • 3 key criteria for localizing PRSP 1. Relationship with donors – Linkage between PRSP and debt relief – Aid dependency – Donor composition, etc. 2. Presence or absence of a national development strategy and its quality 3. Causes of poverty Aid Dependency (US$ per capita and % of GDP, 1998) ODA/GDP % 30 Mozambique Nicaragua 25 Laos Mongolia 20 Mauritania Burkina Faso 15 Tanzania Cambodia 10 Zambia Ghana Nepal Uganda 5 0 Bolivia Honduras Vietnam Kenya Bangladesh Sri Lanka PakistanIndonesia 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 ODA/capita US$ Donor Composition Vietnam : Major Donors 1998-2000 Average Others 17.2% Denmark 2.8% Germany 3.6% France 4.6% ADB 12.0% Japan 46.3% IDA 13.5% Donor Composition Uganda: Major Donors 1998-2000 Average UK 20.3% Others 38.0% Tanzania: Major Donors 1998-2000 Average UK 13.2% Others 41.0% Japan 12.4% IDA 14.1% Nether land 5.0% IDA 12.2% USA 6.9% EU 7.4% Denmark 9.2% Germany Denmark 7.0% 7.2% Nether land 8.0% ODA Composition: Grants vs. Loans Vietnam Bolivia Grants Loans Uganda Tanzania 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% National Development Strategy • How is PRSP—imported from without—treated domestically? • 2 prototypes: – PRSP as a supplementary document – PRSP as a primary document PRSP as a Supplementary Document • Existing national development plans guide budget, sector plans and PRSP. • PRSP supplement, with special attention to poverty reduction – Cross-cutting perspective – Participatory process, etc. • Example: Vietnam PRSP as a Supplementary Document Existing dev. plan govern PRSP Sector plans supplement Budget PRSP as a Primary Document • PRSP co-exists with the national development plan • Newly introduced PRSP exerts a stronger influence over budget and sector plans. • Examples: Tanzania, Uganda PRSP as a Primary Document Existing dev. plan symbolic PRSP govern Sector plans, budget, MTEF, aid procedures Institutional Options based on the Existing System • PRSP-supplementary: donors should respect and support the existing policy framework (rather than replacing it with PRSP). • PRSP-primary: donors can utilize PRSP & related systems and support local capacity building around PRSP. Causes of Poverty • Need for correct matching between diagnosis and prescription in each country – How poverty is created? – How can growth reduce poverty? [Ishikawa 2002] Causes of Poverty (contd.) • Case 1: a poor country equipped with policies & programs to promote social equity and social service delivery system – A good growth strategy is needed to improve the purchasing power of the general population. – Example: Vietnam Causes of Poverty (contd.) • Case 2: a poor country constrained with uneven opportunities due to social discrimination (e.g., gender, racial and ethnic discrimination) – Formulation and implementation of efficient & effective pro-poor targeting measures are needed—in addition to a growth strategy. Infant Mortality Rate (2000) 100 (per 1,000 live births) 90 80 70 60 Average of low income countries Average of middle income countries 50 40 30 20 Sources: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2002; For Taiwan, ADB, Key Indicators 2001 . Singapore Hong Kong Japan Taiwan Malaysia Korea Vietnam Thailand China Indonesia Cambodia Myanmar Lao PDR 0 Philippines 10 % Female Adult Illiteracy Rate (2000) 80 70 Average of low income countries 60 50 40 Average of middle income countries 30 20 Sources: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2002; For Taiw an, ADB, Key Indicators 2001 . Korea Thailand Vietnam Hong Kong Singapore Taiwan Myanmar Malaysia Indonesia China Cambodia Lao PDR 0 Philippines 10 Country Diversity and Strategic Alternatives • Reflect the stages of development (economic, social, institutional etc.), and other country-specific opportunities & constraints. • Identify an appropriate mix for each country: “pro-poor targeted” vs. “broadbased growth” expenditures [Ishikawa 2002] 3. Vietnam’s PRSP Experience • Recognized internationally as “good practice”: strong country ownership • PRSP renamed to “Comprehensive Poverty Reduction & Growth (CPRGS) Strategy” • CPRGS: as a document subordinate to the core documents which embrace a growth-oriented development vision. Vietnam’s PRSP Experience • Different perspective from the early PRSPs – First East Asian country to complete Full-PRSP (May 2002) – PRSP not linked to enhanced debt relief program About Vietnam • • • • • • Population: 78.5 million Located at the heart of East Asia Years of wars and central planning Income per capita: $390 per year Life expectancy at births: 69 years Female adult illiteracy rate: 9% [2000 data, WB] About Vietnam (contd.) • Transition to a market economy “Doi Moi” policy (1986~ ): domestic liberalization • International integration (early 1990s ~ ): trade, FDI, aid flows • Achieving high growth rates (7~8% per year) and halving the ratio of extreme poverty in the 1990s Progress in the Last Decade Real GDP Growth Poverty % 12.0 70 10.0 60 8.0 50 6.0 40 % 58 37 30 25 4.0 20 2.0 15 10 0.0 86 9 1 1993 1998 0 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 000 2 01 Source: Government Statistics Office (GSO), Government of Vietnam. Below Total Poverty Line Below Food Poverty Line Source: World Bank, “World Bank and Vietnam,” [http://www.worldbank.or.jp/06group/RC_flame.htm]. Vietnam is a Large FDI Receiver Low & middle incomecountries 0.9 % of GDP, average 1991-99 High Income countries 3.2 Chile 3.5 Malaysia 3.2 Argentina 1.6 Mexico 1.2 China 1.1 Brazil 1 Korea, Rep. 0.8 Vietnam (1991-00) 5.4 0 1 2 3 Source: Government of Vietnam and World Bank, SIMA database (cited from Vietnam 2010 Entering the 21st Centruy , Joint Report of World Bank, ADB and UNDP, November 2000 . 4 5 6 (%) Asian Dynamism: Key Factor • Development driven by trade & investment • East Asian growth as collective phenomenon: “Flying Geese Pattern” • Development as catching up (vs. development as poverty reduction) • Participation in regional/global production network through int’l division of labor Share in World Export Per Capita GNP Growth (%) (%) 7 18 6 16 East Asia 14 5 East Asia 12 4 10 3 8 Sub Saharan Africa 2 6 Sub Saharan Africa 4 1 2 0 0 60s 70s 80s 90s Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, White Paper on International Trade 2001, p.78. 60s 70s 80s 90s East Asia Reduced Poverty Despite Currency Crisis Population in Extreme Poverty (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1990 1999 East Asia Latin America South Asia SubSaharan Africa Asian Dynamism: Key Factor • Vietnam with typical East Asian aspiration • National goal: Industrialization & Modernization by 2020 (10-Year Strategy & 5-Year Plan) • Very strong interest in narrowing intraregional gaps (vs. original ASEAN) Asian Dynamism: Key Factor • Also interested in infrastructure, HRD, trade, FDI attraction • Narrow “poverty reduction” approach, not enough PRSP Approach Goal: Poverty Reduction MDGs CDF/PRSP Means: Pro-Poor Policies Growth Policies East Asian Aspiration Goal: Equitable Growth < Vietnam > Industrialization & Modernization 5-Year Plan & 10Year Strategy Means: Growth Policies Social Policies Lastly… • Diversifying PRSP, more flexibility • Specific criteria for localizing PRSP • Options for institutional arrangements • Strategic alternatives: different causes, different responses Japan’s Cooperation • Country ownership and partnership • Supporting balanced growth with equity – Creating the enabling environment for trade & investment, through infrastructure, HRD, policy advice, etc. – Coping with risks & emerging social problems • Through an appropriate mix of grants, loans, and technical cooperation The END For more details, please see our information module at: http//www.grips.ac.jp/forum-e/ by GRIPS Development Forum