Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Spending for Development in Papua Social, Economic and Fiscal Trends Presentation for the Tangguh Independent Advisory Panel (TIAP) World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, Jakarta Jakarta, April 2009 1 Spending for Development in Papua: Key Messages Main message Papua’s key challenge is not to generate additional resources but to use the existing resources wisely. Poverty and the economy Papua and West Papua (or Papua Barat) are provinces of extremes, with high poverty, relatively high GDP, the lowest population density and the highest fiscal resources in Indonesia. Since 2002, poverty declined from 46 percent to 37 percent. However, Papua and West Papua remain Indonesia’s poorest regions. The district of Teluk Bintuni, where the new Tangguh plan is located, is lagging in most social and economic indicators, with the exception of regional GDP and child immunization. Revenues, expenditures and fiscal projections Since 2000, Papua’s revenues have increased fivefold (in real terms). Since 2002, when special autonomy started, revenues have increased 2.5 times (in real terms). Spending on government administration has traditionally dominated Papua’s expenditures. However, since 2006, infrastructure spending has increased substantially and overtaken government administration. After modest increases in the next 5 years, Papua’s overall revenues are expected to double by 2020 but only partly due to revenues from Tangguh LNG. However, the province of Papua Barat will substantially increase its revenues due to Tangguh. 2 1 A note on the use of the term “Papua” Papua refers to both Papua province and Papua Barat province. Papua province refers to the Province of Papua after splitting with Papua Barat. Papua Barat refers to the Province of Papua Barat (West Papua), which was established in 2004. 3 2 Poverty and the Economy 4 Since 2002, poverty declined from 46 percent to 37 percent but Papua remains Indonesia’s poorest region 50 46.0 44.4 40 Poverty rate (%) 41.5 41.8 40.8 37.0 38.7 38.7 40.8 41.3 39.3 35.0 30 19.1 20 18.4 10 18.2 17.4 16.7 16.7 17.8 16.6 15.4 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0 2000 2001 Papua Papua Barat Source: Central (BPS) Source: CentralBureau BureauStatistic of Statistics (BPS), various publications. 5 3 National Maluku Utara NTT Maluku Gorontalo Sulawesi Barat NTB Lampung Bengkulu Sulawesi Tenggara Sulawesi Selatan Sulawesi Tengah Yogyakarta Jawa Tengah Kalimantan Barat Jambi Sulawesi Utara Kalimantan Selatan Banten Bali Sumatra Barat Jawa Barat Kalimantan Tengah Sumatra Utara Jawa Timur Papua Barat Sumatra Selatan National Bangka Belitung Aceh Papua Kepulauan Riau Riau DKI Jakarta Kalimantan Timur Regional GDP per capita (Rp million) Papua’s regional GDP is high; Papua province is even 50% higher than the national average, mainly due to mining 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) 6 4 Maluku Utara NTT Maluku Gorontalo NTB Sulawesi Barat Lampung Bengkulu Sulawesi Selatan Sulawesi Tenggara Papua Jawa Tengah Jambi Sulawesi Tengah Kalimantan Selatan Yogyakarta Sumatra Selatan Kalimantan Barat Papua Barat Sulawesi Utara Banten Bali Aceh Sumatra Barat Jawa Barat Bangka Belitung Kalimantan Tengah National Sumatra Utara Jawa Timur Kalimantan Timur Riau Kepulauan Riau DKI Jakarta Regional GDP excluding mining (Rp million) However, excluding mining, both provinces are below the national average, and Papua Barat is richer than Papua 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) 7 5 Mining dominates the economy of Papua province … Government administration*, 5% Transportation and communication, 4% Others**, 3% Agriculture, 11% Trade, restaurant, and hotel, 4% Construction, 4% Mining, oil, and gas, 69% Note: * Government administration mainly consists of salaries. Public investment, including for administration (e.g. cars offices) is part of the other economic categories. Excluding mining, the share of core government administration would raise to above 15% of GDP, one of the highest in Indonesia. ** Includes sectors such as manufacturing, financial services, electricity, gas, and water supply. Source: Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) 8 6 …while Papua Barat’s economy is much more diversified Government administration*, 8% Others**, 2% Transportation and communication, 7% Agriculture, 27% Trade, restaurant, and hotel, 10% Construction, 8% Mining, oil, and gas, 17% Manufacturing ( related to o il and gas ), 19% Note: * Government administration mainly consists of salaries. Public investment, including for administration (e.g. cars offices) is part of the other economic categories. Excluding mining, oil, gas and related manufacturing the share of core government administration would raise to 11% of GDP, also one of the highest in Indonesia. ** Includes sectors such as financial services, and electricity, gas, and water supply. Source: Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) 9 7 The district of Teluk Bintuni is lagging in most social and economic indicators, with the exception of regional GDP and child immunization. Teluk Bintuni Value Rank in Papua (out of 29) Rank in Papua Barat (out of 9) 60.1 21 8 50,766 20 6 Gross Regional Domestic Product per capita (BPS) 2006 10,504,400 8 3 Net Enrollment Rate for Primary % (Susenas) 2007 86.7 21 8 Net Enrollment Rate for Junior % (Susenas) 2007 47.2 14 5 Net Enrollment Rate for Senior % (Susenas) 2007 23.8 20 7 Children<5 yrs with immunization % (MoH Survey) 2008 48.4 6 2 Household with access to safe water % (MoH Survey) 2008 20.8 19 9 16 7 Human Development Index (BPS) 2006 Population (BPS) 2006 Household with access to electricity % 47.6 (Susenas) 2007Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) and Ministry Source: of Health Source: Susenas, BPS and Ministry of Health statistics. 10 8 Revenues, Expenditures and Fiscal Projections 11 In 2002, Papua’s revenue per capita was the second highest in Indonesia … 3.5 3.0 Rp Million 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Own Source Revenue per capita (2002) Shared Tax Revenue per capita (2002) Special Autonom y Fund (Ots us ) per capita (2002) 9 Kalimantan Timur Papua Riau Maluku Utara DKI Jakarta Maluku Bali Kalimantan Tengah Jambi Bangka Belitung Kalimantan Selatan General Allocation Fund (DAU) per capita (2002) Shared Natural Res ource Revenue per capita (2002) Note: Consolidated data (province + districts) per capita. Source: Regional Information Financial System (SIKD) Ministry of Finance and BPS. 12 Gorontalo NAD Sulawesi Utara Sulawesi Tenggara NTT Sumatra Barat Sulawesi Tengah Sulawesi Selatan Kalimantan Barat Bengkulu Sumatra Selatan NTB Sumatra Utara Yogyakarta Lampung Jawa Timur Jawa Tengah Banten Jawa Barat 0.0 …and by 2009, Papua and the new Papua Barat province have become Indonesia’s fiscally richest provinces… 10 9 8 Rp Million 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Ow n Source Revenue per capita (2006) Shared Tax Revenue per capita (2006) Note: Consolidated data (province + districts) per capita. Source: Regional Information Financial System (SIKD) Ministry of Finance and BPS. 10 Papua Papua Barat Kepulauan Riau Aceh Kalimantan Timur Maluku Utara Riau Kalimantan Tengah General Allocation Fund (DAU) per capita (2009) Shared Natural Resource Revenue per capita (2006) Special Autonomy Fund (Otsus) per capita (2009) 13 Gorontalo Sulawesi Tenggara Bangka Belitung Maluku Sulawesi Barat Bengkulu Sulawesi Utara Kalimantan Selatan Jambi Sulawesi Tengah NTT Kalimantan Barat Sumatra Barat Yogyakarta Sumatra Selatan Sulawesi Selatan Bali DKI Jakarta NTB Sumatra Utara Jawa Timur Jawa Tengah Lampung Jawa Barat Banten 0 … which is partly due to additional transfers through the special autonomy fund, which only Papua, Papua Barat and Aceh are receiving Oil and Gas Revenue Shares[1] Special Autonomy allocation (Dana Otsus) 2001-2008 70% 2% of total DAU[2] from 2009 70% 1.4% of total DAU[3] 2004-2008 70% 0[4] from 2009 70% 0.6% of total DAU pre 2008 70% 0 from 2008 70% 2% of total DAU Oil: 15%, Gas: 30% 0 Province Papua Papua Barat Other provinces Aceh Rest of Indonesia [1] The revenues will be allocated to the provincial government, producing districts, and other districts within the province. [2] DAU: General allocation funds [3] Starting from 2009, the Papua and West Papua provinces got 70% and 30%, respectively, of the Otsus funds for the whole Papua Island. [4] West Papua was established in late 2003. However, until 2008, the Otsus funds for all districts in the province were managed by the Papua provincial government, and the West Papua provincial government did not get any Otsus funds. 14 11 Transfers to Papua increased significantly in 2006. Since then, they remained stable for Papua province but continue to increase for Papua Barat’s due to higher Special Autonomy allocations Papua Papua Barat 7 14 6 12 5 Rp Trillion Rp Trillion 16 10 8 6 4 3 2 4 2 1 0 0 2003 2004 2005 DAU Special autonomy funds Total transfer 2006 2007* 2008* 2009** 2004 Revenue sharing DAK Without burden sharing policy 2005 DAU Special autonomy funds Total transfer 2006 2007* 2008* Revenue sharing DAK Without burden sharing policy Source: SIKD and Balancing Fund Allocation (Ministry of Finance). Note: - Consolidated data (province + districts) for Papua and Papua Barat, in constant 2007=100. In 2006, shared tax data only for income tax. - Since 2009, the central government “shares the burden” of energy and fertilizer subsidies with sub-national governments. Approximately 26% of the estimated subsidies will be deducted from the DAU-pool of sub-national governments. 15 12 2009** Spending in Papua continues to be dominated by districts which provide approximately 75% of expenditures since 2006 18 16 14 Rp Trillion 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2004 2005 2006 2007* 2008** 2009*** Note : 2004-2006: Realization, 2007: Realization (Central) and Plan (others), 2008: Unaudited Realization (Central) and Estimation (others), 2009: Estimation Central Province Districts Source : DG Budget, Information (SIKD), Min of Finance. Note: Consolidated dataRegional (province +Finance districts) for Papua and System Papua Barat in constant 2007=100. The central government spending does not include line ministries spending through their representative offices in the regions. Source: SIKD, Ministry of Finance, provinces budget data. 16 13 Since 2005, infrastructure spending increased substantially and became Papua’s main expenditure; government administration remains high in second place 12 10 Rp trillion 8 6 4 2 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 General Government Administration Public Health Housing, Labor, and Social Af f airs Industry, Trade, and Mining 2006 Inf rastructure Education and Culture Agriculture, Forestry, Plantation, Fishery, and Cooperatives Note : - Consolidated data (province + districts) for Papua and Papua Barat province in constant 2007=100. - * Plan budget data. Source : SIKD, Ministry of Finance and provinces’ budget data. 17 2007* 14 Assumptions for future revenue projections, particularly considering additional revenues from Tangguh LNG (see next two slides) General revenue projection: • Central government growth projections: 4.7% (2009), 5.6% (2010), 6.3% (2011), 6.40% (2012), 6.7% (2013), 7.0% (2014), 7.0% (2015), 7.0% (2016), 7.0% (2017), 7.0% (2018) • Revenue/GDP (for US$ 40 per barrel, for other oil prices proportionately higher): 15.9% (2010), 15.7% (2011), 16.0% (2012), 16.6% (2013), 16.8% (2014), 16.9% (2015), 16.7% (2016), 16.6% (2017), 16.3% (2018) • Ratio of Papua DAU to total national DAU: 5% • Ratio of special autonomy fund to total national DAU: 2%. • Ratio of Papua revenue sharing to total national revenue sharing: 4.4% • Ratio of Papua DAK to total national DAK: 8.4% Revenue projection from Tangguh LNG: • Annual production: gradually increase from 2.6 in 2010 to 7.6 million ton in 2015. • Investment cost plus interest: USD 9.6 billion. • Ratio of investment credit and cost recovery to gross revenue: 80%. • Ratio of cost recovery to gross revenue: 30%. • Contractor share of equity to be split: 71% (before tax). • Effective tax rate: 44%. • Regional tax: 13.6%. • Revenue sharing to central government: 30%. • Revenue sharing to Papua: 70%. Note: For more details on the relationship between oil prices and the Indonesian budget as well as revenue sharing with the regions see Agustina et al “Black hole or black Gold? The impact of oil and gas prices on Indonesia’s Public Finances, Policy Research Working Paper (4718), World Bank. 18 15 Based on these assumptions, Papua’s revenues are expected to double by 2018, even though revenues from Tangguh would only add another 8-12% (Rp 3-5 trillion) in extra revenues 45 End of Tangguh investm ent recovery 40 35 30 Rp trillion Start of subsidy "burden sharing" Substantial increase in transfer across Indonesia 25 20 Start of Papua Special Autonom y funding 15 Beginning of decentralization 10 5 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 40 60 80 Note: Consolidated data (province + districts) for Papua and Papua Barat, in constant price 2007=100. Source: MoF and WB staff estimation. 19 16 40 (No Tangguh) However, for Papua Barat the increase will be significant because it would incur all of Tangguh’s shared revenue: By 2018, at US$40 per barrel, revenues would increase by almost 30% compared to the baseline; at US$80 per barrel, revenues would increase by more than 50% 18 16 14 Rp trillion 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2004 2005 2006 40 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 60 2012 80 2013 2014 2015 40 (No Tangguh) Note: Consolidated data (province + districts) for province and districts in Papua Barat, in constant price 2007=100. Source: SIKD/MOF and WB staff estimation. 20 17 2016 2017 2018 For information please contact the Public Finance and Regional Development team of the World Bank in Indonesia: Wolfgang Fengler ([email protected]) Dian Agustina ([email protected]) Adrianus Hendrawan ([email protected])