Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ARGENTINA’S TRADE POLICY Martín Redrado Secretary of International Trade ARGENTINE REPUBLIC • In the 90s, Argentina started along a road of ambitious reforms: openness, privatization, State reform, deregulation. • However, 10 years after the beginning of that process, the results are poor: a 4-year-long recession, 20% unemployment and 45% of the population living below the poverty line. • Regional Risks: the pendulum reaction Thinking that everything that was done was a mistake and beginning a counter-reform (closing the economy, increasing State ownership, market regulations) • Quite the contrary, some unfinished reforms should be completed (Public Sector reform) and new reforms should be encouraged, tax reforms and social expenditures, among others CAUSES OF THE CRISIS • Internal: Lack of systemic competitiveness: structural deficit in the current account Permanent fiscal deficit: increase in the public debt • External: Competitive devaluations in emerging markets (Asia, Latin America) Reversion of capital flows to developing countries INTERNAL CAUSES: EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC DEBT 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 Source: Ministry of Economy EXTERNAL CAUSES FINANCIAL FLOWS TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 180000 Millons of Dollars 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 1993-97 Source: Institute of International Finance 1998-01 IN EARLY 2001 THE TERMINAL STAGE OF THE CRISIS STARTED: Recession with a procyclic tax system led to fiscal insolvency There was no room for the application of a countercyclic fiscal policy The constant rise in country risk exacerbated the financial asphyxia Markets considered the fiscal deficit as unsustainable Any financial engineering (bail-out I and II, mega-swap) proved inadequate There was consensus on the existance of an inescapable exchange rate trap Economic policy fluctuated between facilitating a deflationary adjustment and an expansionary fiscal policy Partial Fiscal incentives plans collided with the “zero deficit policy” This scenario triggered the trauma that led to: - Devaluation - Default - Pesification and the freeze on deposits “corralito” As the result of the crisis, we now have: Institutions that have successfully overcome the political crisis A new exchange regime under way A real exchange rate closer to the break even point A context of uncertainty that will slowly fade away. What is the challenge? 1) To travel the best path, which is not necessarily the easiest or most popular one (populism) 2) To avoid the worst of Argentine mistakes: the economic pendulum What does this mean? - To correct and improve, without destroying all that has been done - If economic reforms have had defects, they must be improved WHAT IS THE WAY OUT? FISCAL SOLVENCY AND AN EXPORT-ORIENTED MODEL Systemic Competitiveness + Openness DEVELOPMENT • Competitiveness is the axis of Argentina´s New Economic Program • Openness is the guiding principle of Argentina´s New Trade Policy • Openness and Competitiveness enhance each other and must be simultaneous SYSTEMIC COMPETITIVENESS Requires a New Generation of Reforms • State Reform • Making Public Social Expenditure more efficient. • Tax Reform • New Fiscal Regime between the Federal Government and the Provinces FOCUSING SOCIAL EXPENDITURE Distribution of Students in the State Education System Primary School 4% Wealthier quintile 7% 13% 52% Poorer quintile 24% Poorer 20% Quintile II Quintile III Quintile IV Wealthier 20% Universities Wealthier quintile 29% 6% Poorer quintile 15% 20% 30% Poorer 20% Quintile II Quintile III Quintile IV Wealthier 20% THE PROBLEM IS NOT RESOURCES... BUT EFFICIENCY Variation in Public Social Spending (%) (in percentages) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Total Education Variation% 2000/93 Health Variation% 2000/96 MISMATCH BETWEEN REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE Revenue Provincial 17% Municipat 7% Federal gov´t 76% Expenditure minicipal gov´t 11% Provinces 43% Fed. gov´t 46% REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF TRABAJAR EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS 90 80 18.6 70 60 17.1 22.3 50 12.2 13.0 16.6 18.4 15.2 12.6 19.2 12.3 13.3 30 15.6 10.6 4.1 10.1 14.8 20 2.1 18.5 12.5 13.9 14.0 Temporary government work plans (per 10,000 inhabitants) The figures next to the line s are the unemployment rates in each jurisdiction (%) 13.4 La Rioja Chubut Buenos Aires Córdoba San Luis Santa Cruz San Juan Entre Ríos Misiones Río Negro T. del Fuego Santa Fe Neuquén La Pampa Tucumán Formosa Corrientes S. del Estero Salta Chaco Catamarca Jujuy 0 Mendoza 10.7 10 Cdad. Bs.As. 40 0 Cdad. Bs.As. Buenos Aires Mendoza Córdoba Santa Cruz Misiones Neuquén Tucumán S. del Estero Corrientes Río Negro Chubut Entre Ríos Jujuy Chaco Santa Fe Salta San Juan La Pampa Formosa La Rioja Catamarca San Luis T. del Fuego in pesos TRANSFERS TO PROVINCES PER INHABITANT (includes revenue sharing and other items) 2000 1500 1000 500 SOCIAL INDICATORS AND REGIONAL ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL EXPENDITURE (population-weighted averages) Region Average Income (pesos) Central Cuyo NW NE Patagonia * Pesos as of 1999 261.3 232.8 183.8 162.8 297.9 Unemployed (% PEA) 17.5 11.5 17.1 11.3 11.3 Poverty (% NBI) 13.3 14.2 25.6 26.4 13.8 Infant Mortality (%) 20.8 17.7 20.9 20 17.4 Federal Expenditure Per capita (pesos)* 566.8 882.9 751.9 387.9 763.1 AN AGRESSIVE AND ONGOING TRADE POLICY: Openness is the guiding principle of Argentina´s new Trade Policy THE PILLARS: - Multipolar Negotiation Strategy - Development of markets A new Managing Model Private Sector Permanent Argentinean Politics in the International Field PUBLIC SECTOR Academic Sector Multipolar Strategy Integration False dichotomy USA or EU, Mercosur or FTAA It is MERCOSUR and FTAA and EU and USA Mercosur Platform Hemispheric Side Multilateral Argentina is not a single issue country as a single producer country. Agriculture+ Industrial Goods + Services Opening should be reciprocate European Side Multilateral Side GENERAL BALANCE MODEL SIMULATED SCENARIOS • FTAA • MERCOSUR + EU • FTAA + (MERCOSUR + EU) • 4 + 1 (free trade area between MERCOSUR and the US) • Free world trade (framework) AGGREGATE RESULTS ARGENTINA GDP GROWTH Full variant* 8 5.6 6 percentage 7.2 4.3 3.5 4 2.6 2 0 4+1 FTAA MERCOSUR + EU Free World Trade ALCA + (MERCOSUR +EU) Source: CEI * Growing yields to scale, trade-related externalities and capital accumulation in the medium term AGGREGATE RESULTS GROWTH OF ARGENTINE EXPORTS Full Variant 30 27.2 28.5 FTAA + (MERCOSUR + EU) Free World Trade percentage 25 20 14.2 15 10 15.7 8.9 5 0 4+1 Source: CEI FTAA MERCOSUR + EU Multipolar Negotiation Strategy Country per country, product per product • United States:Bilateral Trade and Investment Council: Steel, Citric, Cooked Meat, General System of Preferences • Brazil:: Automotive agreement - Removal of Phitosanitary barriers - Medicine. • Chile: Automotive agreement - Deepening of the General Agreement of Preferences • South Africa: New businesses, Opening of markets, Food Sector, Automotive Sector. • México:Bilateral Trade and Investment Council - Automotive Agreement - Beginning conversations for Free Trade Area . • FTAA: Due date to end negotiations 31/12/2004 - Approval on time of methods and modes, acces to markets, agriculture, services, inversions, government procurement • EU: Reopening meat market + Aditional Hilton Quota - To accelerate negotations and finish as soon as possible (Madrid statement) Multipolar Strategy Country per country, product per product First results: U$S 2.200 million of new markets Product Country Cars Brazil 300 Cars Mexico 310 Cars Chile 270 Meat Europe 300 Meat (aditional Hilton quota) Cooked Meat Europe United States 65 60 Food, Timber, Clothing United States 570 Steel United States 150* Medicine Brazil 50 Food (Phitosanitary barriers) Flours, oils Brazil 50 Chile 90 U$S million This is not a new market, instead negotations prevented from its disappearance MARKET DEVELOPMENT POLICY Our priority is to help launch the private sector to world markets • Through market intelligence and democratization of market information • By turning every government office into a window to offer Argentine products (goods, tourism and services) • With an active agenda of trade mission to unexplored markets (i.e. South Africa) • Communicating our export supply offer to the world through a new official website • Identify any potential demand for Argentine goods and services CONCLUSIONS: - The typical “Argentine pendulum” should be avoided - A sustainable balance should be sought - Once macro-financial stability has been restored, Argentina´s economy has considerable growth potential - FISCAL SOLVENCYand the EXPORT-ORIENTED MODEL (systemic competitiveness) are the pillars for a sustainable development, the only way to honour our commitments. ARGENTINA’S TRADE POLICY Martín Redrado Secretary of International Trade ARGENTINE REPUBLIC