* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ISLM_2010_post_000 - Department of Economics
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
Full employment wikipedia , lookup
Nominal rigidity wikipedia , lookup
Edmund Phelps wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Long Depression wikipedia , lookup
Early 1980s recession wikipedia , lookup
Helicopter money wikipedia , lookup
Phillips curve wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Austrian business cycle theory wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Post-war displacement of Keynesianism wikipedia , lookup
28 Unemployment rate (%) 24 20 16 12 8 Keynes 4 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1 1940 Let’s review our voyage to date: We have analyzed: • Measuring economic activity • Aggregate production functions and distribution • Classical AS and AD (flexible w and p) • Financial macro (including money) • Open-economy macro We now move on to • Business cycles, Keynesian economics, and the ISLM model 2 What picture do you have in mind when you think of business cycles? “Note that the pattern of cycles is irregular. No two business cycles are quite the same. No exact formula, such as might apply to the revolutions of the planets or of a pendulum, can be used to predict the duration and timing of business cycles. Rather, in their irregularities, business cycles more closely resemble the fluctuations of the weather.” (Paul Samuelson) 3 Understanding business cycles Major elements of cycles – – – – short-period (1-3 yr) erratic fluctuations in output pro-cyclical movements of employment, profits, prices counter-cyclical movements in unemployment appearance of “involuntary” unemployment in recessions Historical trends – lower volatility of output, inflation over time (until 2008) – movement from stable prices to rising prices since WW II 4 Output gap and recessions Ratio actual to potential GDP 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.02 1.00 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Shaded areas are NBER recessions 00 05 10 5 Unemployment and recessions 11 10 Unemployment rate 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Shaded areas are NBER recessions 00 05 10 6 Unemployment and vacancies (2000-2010) 11 10 2010 Unemployment rate 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2000 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 Vacancy rate 7 So what’s the big problem for economics? Many economists worry that there are no firm “microeconomic foundations” for Keynesian business cycle theory. What should we do? - throw out the theory? - live with this inadequacy? 8 Alternative Schools of Macroeconomics Frictions in market institutions? Market clearing and perfect competition Rational Frictions consumers in indiv- and profit maximizers idual Neoclassical (Solow, Arrow-Debreu); new classical macro; real business cycles decision Bounded making? rationality, Original Keynes; behavioral monetarist? economics 9 Market frictions: sticky prices and wages; imperfect competition Neo-Keynesian (menu costs and contract theory); structuralism Mainstream Keynesian 9 Alternative Schools of Macroeconomics Frictions in market institutions? Market clearing and perfect competition Frictions Ultrain indiv- rational idual decision making? Bounded rationality 10 Market frictions: sticky prices and wages; imperfect competition This has been the approach up to now. Classical model; Neoclassical growth; new classical macro; real business cycles 10 We now move to a different set of assumptions/observations Alternative Schools of Macroeconomics Frictions in market institutions? Market clearing and perfect competition Neoclassical (Solow, Arrow-Debreu); new classical macro; real business cycles Frictions Ultrain indiv- rational idual decision making? Bounded Original Keynes; rationality monetarist? Market frictions: sticky prices and wages; imperfect competition Neo-Keynesian (menu costs and contract theory); structuralism Mainstream Keynesian 11 Major approaches to business cycles Classical: market clearing: supply-side cycles with vertical AS curve: • Real business cycles: major active classical species today Keynesian and offshoots: non-market clearing with non-vertical AS • Essential to have non-classical AS • Fixed or sticky p and w • AD shifts affect output and employment • Underlying theory incompletely understook – active area of research Basic models in Keynesian approach • “Keynesian cross” (Econ 116) • AS-AD (Econ 116) • IS-LM (Econ 122) • Mankiw’s dynamic model (later) • Open-economy in short run: Mundell-Fleming (later in course) 12 Keynesian Cross Diagram: Output where planned expenditure equals output Expenditures Equilibrium output C+I+G+NX E* Y* Real output (Y) 13 AS-AD approach Price (P) AS Classical model P* AD Fix-price Model (IS-LM) AD Y* Real output (Y) 14 IS-LM model The major tool for showing the impact of monetary and fiscal polices, along with the effect of various shocks, in a short-run Keynesian situation. Key assumptions • Fixed prices (P=1) • Unemployed resources (Y < potential Y = Mankiw’s natural Y) • Closed economy (not essential and will be considered later) 15 The Founder of Macroeconomics Gwendolen Darwin Raverat 16 16 Keynes on Why macroeconomics is difficult or Why the models are so confusing! Professor Planck, of Berlin, the famous originator of the Quantum Theory, once remarked to me that in early life he had thought of studying economics, but had found it too difficult! Professor Planck could easily master the whole corpus of mathematical economics in a few days. But the amalgam of logic and intuition and the wide knowledge of facts, most of which are not precise, which is required for economic interpretation in its highest form is, quite truly, overwhelmingly difficult. (“Biography of Marshall,” Economic Journal, 1924) 17 17 18 Where are we? We are now attempting to understand the basic features of business cycles. Aggregate supply (AS) in this model is real simple: a horizontal AS curve with p=1. AD relies on the IS-LM model, which is a very simple twomarket model of the determinants of AD. The two markets are - goods (IS) - financial (LM) 19 IS curve (expenditures) Basic idea: describes equilibrium in goods market Finds Y where planned I = planned S or planned expenditure = planned output Basic set of equations: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Y=C+I+G C = a + b(Y-T) T = T0 + τ Y [note assume income tax, τ = marginal tax rate] I = I0 –dr [note i = r because fixed P] G = G0 20 which gives the IS curve: a - bT0 + G0 + I0 - dr 1 - b(1- τ) Y = Y = μ [A0 - dr] where A0 = autonomous spending = a - bT0 + G0 + I0 μ = multiplier = 1/[(1 - b(1- τ)] or in terms of solving for the interest rate: r = (A0 - Y/μ ) / d which we graph as the IS curve. 21 LM curve (financial markets) • The LM curve represents equilibrium in financial markets, or where the supply and demand for money are equilibrated. • Ms determined by the central bank Ms = M 0 interest rate (r) IS-LM curve LM • Standard interest-elastic demand for money:* Md = L(i, Y) = kY- hi • Equilibrium in the money market is Md = Ms • This leads to LM curve: i = ( kY - M0 )/h Real output (Q) • Not the best way to understand financial markets; will consider alternative approach later. * Note that interest rate is nominal rate here to reflect the difference between the interest rate on bonds and that on money. 22 Summary of IS-LM 1. 2. 3. 4. Y≡C+I+G C = a + b(Y-T) T = T0 + τY I = I0 – dr 5. G = G0 6. Ms = M0 7. Md = L(i, Y) = kY- hi = kY- hr [r = i because zero inflation] All this yields hμ Y* = ―――――― A0 dμk + h dμ + ――――― M0 dμk + h where A0 = autonomous spending = a - bT0 + G0 + I0 μ = expenditure multiplier at constant r = 1/[(1 - b(1- τ)] 23 Overall Macroeconomic Equilibrium • We now are looking for equilibrium of both markets. That is, when both goods market and money market are in equilibrium. • Closed economy and zero inflation (so i=r) • This is the solution or intersection of IS and LM. hμ Y* = ―――――― A0 dμk + h dμ + ――――― M0 dμk + h • Impact of fiscal and monetary policy function of the different parameters. Easiest to understand using the IS-LM diagram. 24 interest rate (r) IS-LM diagram LM(r; M, risk premium,…) r* IS(r; G, T0 ,τ …) Y* Real output (Y) 25 SOME BASICS OF THE IS-LM MODEL • Have two major kinds of shocks in business cycles: – IS: investment, consumption, foreign trade, … – LM: financial markets, monetary policy, exchange rates,… • Because of monetary reaction, expenditure multiplier is almost surely less than standard Keynesian multiplier due to crowding out. – Proof: IS-LM multiplier = μ/[dμk/h + 1] < μ = simplest multiplier • Can usually diagnose shock by the relative movements of output and interest rates (compare Vietnam War and 1979-82 on next slide) 26 Now several interesting cases Case 1. A change in monetary policy Note: by a monetary policy, we here mean a change in the money supply (such as an open market operation), leading to a shift in the LM curve. 27 interest rate (r) Monetary shift LM LM’ r* r*’ IS Y* Y*’ Real output (Y) 28 More on financial issues… Case 1A. A monetary crisis that increases risk premiums - This important case will be covered next time when we do the Great Depression (and today’s Great Recession). 29 Case 2. What are the effects of fiscal policy? A fiscal policy shift is change in purchases (G) or in taxes (T), holding LM curve constant. See Figure. 30 interest rate (r) Fiscal expansion LM r*’ r* IS’ IS Y* Y*’ Real output (Y) 31 What is the multiplier? interest rate (r) LM A B IS’ IS multiplier Real output (Y) μ 32 Multiplier Estimates by the CBO 3.0 Multiplier from G,T on GDP 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 G: Fed G: S&L Trans: indiv Tax: Mid/Low Income Tax: High Income Congressional Budget Office, Estimated Impact of the ARRA, April 2010 Bus Tax 33 Case 2b. The liquidity trap. Today, this is taken to be where nominal interest rate is zero. • The US in the mid-1930s • Japan over last decade • US in 2009-2010 34 6 US short-term interest rates, 1929-45 (% per year) Liquidity trap in US in Great Depression 5 4 3 2 1 0 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 35 Japan short-term interest rates, 1994-2006 Liquidity trap from 1999 to early 2006 36 US today Federal funds interest rate (% per annum) 20 16 Policy has hit the “zero lower bound” this year. 12 8 4 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 37 interest rate (r) Liquidity trap IS LM LM’ Y*=Y*’ 38 Heavy hitters in the Obama administration Outgoing CEA head Christina Romer New CEA head Austan Goolsbee Economics czar Larry Summers Regulation: Cass Sunstein 3 Departed budget: Peter Orszag 39 Can you see why macroeconomists emphasize the importance of fiscal policy in the current environment? “Our policy approach started with a major commitment to fiscal stimulus. Economists in recent years have become skeptical about discretionary fiscal policy and have regarded monetary policy as a better tool for short-term stabilization. Our judgment, however, was that in a liquidity trap-type scenario of zero interest rates, a dysfunctional financial system, and expectations of protracted contraction, the results of monetary policy were highly uncertain whereas fiscal policy was likely to be potent.” Lawrence Summers, July 19, 2009 40 Case 3. Monetarism • The monetarist regime: "Only money matters for output determination.“ (Milton Friedman). • We can go back to quantity theory of money and prices: PY = VM • In monetarism view, velocity is constant . This would lead to a vertical LM curve: Md = kY – 0i • Hence, equilibrating supply and demand for M yields: Y =Ms/k 41 interest rate (r) “Monetarist” case LM Note impacts of: 1. Monetary policy 2. Fiscal policy r* IS Y* Real output (Y) 42 Important historical cases Case 4. Changing the fiscal-monetary mix to stimulate or depress investment – A depressing example of tight money and loose fiscal • New Fed chairman Volcker moved to tighten money and wring inflation out of economy (1979 on) • New President Reagan launched supply-side tax policies, military buildup, leading to high deficits (1981 on) • How did this affect fiscal-monetary mix 43 interest rate (r) 1979-84 shift LM’ LM 1984 r1984 r1982 1982 1979 r1979 IS’ IS Y1982 Y1979 Real output (Y) = Y1984 44 Important historical cases Pro-growth policies – The opposite would be to tighten fiscal policies and loosen monetary policies. – Make sure you understand how this would increase investment and increase the growth in potential output. 45 Summary on IS-LM Model This is the workhorse model for analyzing short-run impacts of monetary and fiscal policy Key assumptions: - Fixed or rigid prices - Unemployed resources Now on to analysis of Great Depression in IS-LM framework. 46