Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Comparing Singapore & Hong Kong Singapore & Hong Kong • Area – Singapore: 697 km2 – Hong Kong: 1,108 km2 • Population – Singapore: 5.7 million – annual growth 1.9% – Hong Kong: 7.1 million – annual growth 0.4% Singapore and Hong Kong • Each is separated from the mainland by a narrow waterway • Singapore’s relationship with Malaysia has been volatile – brief merge in 1963-1965 – disputes about water delivery, islands, etc. • Hong Kong benefits from mainland China’s cheap labor and market Singapore and Hong Kong • Both are mostly ethnic Chinese societies – Singapore: 77% – Hong Kong: 94% • both had over 100 years of British rule – Singapore: 1819 - 1959 – Hong Kong: 1841 - 1997 • both were occupied by Japan – 1942 - 1945 GDP (purchasing power parity) • Singapore: – US$445 billion (2014) – Ranked 40th in the world – per capita 7th in the world • Hong Kong: – US$401 billion (2014) – Ranked 45th in the world – per capita 17th in the world -6 19 99 19 97 19 95 19 93 19 91 19 89 19 87 19 85 19 83 19 81 19 79 19 77 19 75 19 73 19 71 19 69 19 67 19 65 19 63 19 61 GDP Growth Rates (% ) of Singapore (red bars) and Hong Kong (blue bars) 18 12 6 0 Singapore and Hong Kong • • • • • • Both are newly industrialized economies GDP composition: Sector Singapore Hong Kong agriculture 0% 0% industry 25% 7% service 75% 93% Singapore and Hong Kong • Exports: – Singapore: 13th in the world – Hong Kong: 8th in the world • 54% to mainland China • Imports: – Singapore: 14th in the world – Hong Kong: 7th in the world • 47% from mainland China Exports of G.&S. (% of GDP) Economic development • Singapore and Hong Kong – have achieved similar economic success – through very different economic approaches • path of economic development diverged after World War II – similar experience under British colonial rule – divergent political development after WWII – divergent economic models after 1960s Colonial legacies • Both became entry ports to mainland • both benefited from British management and technological expertise • both attracted inflow of Chinese emigrants – Chinese population in Singapore doubled in 1820s – Chinese population in Hong Kong quadrupled between the two World Wars Divergent paths after WWII • Singapore gained independence (1959) – Lee Kuan Yew’s People’s Action Party • economy grew at a slow pace in 1950s – still based on intermediary trade – boosted by the Korean War of 1950 - 1953 Divergent paths after WWII • Hong Kong restructured its economy – population quadrupled 1945 - 1955 – large-scale relocation of capital, entrepreneurs, and assets from mainland China – trade embargo against mainland China after Korean War broke out actually benefited HK • relative political stability – popular political apathy Divergent development model • Singapore’s People’s Action Party – faced severe internal and external conflicts in 1960s – PAP became a elitist and paternalistic party – neo-Confucianism? • government intervention in the economy – drew up a state development plan Singapore’s development 1960s • New institutions – Economic Development Board • promote industrial development – Housing and Development Board • develop industrial estates – Development Bank of Singapore • provide industrial financing – Jurong Town Corporation • acquire, develop, and manage development sites Singapore’s development 1960s • Restructured from trading port to manufacturing base • government intervention to attract foreign investment – in labor market – in providing public housing – in improving educational facilities – in developing a social security system Singapore’s development 1960s • produced phenomenal economic growth • achieved full employment by early 1970s • ventured into high-tech, capital-intensive industries and high value-added services Singapore's GDP 1960-1984 (in constant local currency) 5.E+10 4.E+10 3.E+10 2.E+10 1.E+10 0.E+00 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Hong Kong’s development • Hong Kong also enjoyed phenomenal economic success – rapid expansion in manufacturing in 1960s – industrial diversification in 1970s Hong Kong's GDP 1960-1984 (in constant local currency) 8.E+10 7.E+10 6.E+10 5.E+10 4.E+10 3.E+10 2.E+10 1.E+10 0.E+00 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Hong Kong’s development • government’s laissez-faire principle • reactive, selective, & reluctant intervention – development of public housing – provide lower-middle-income families with access to home ownership – social expenditure & community development – development of human resources • intervention to maintain competitiveness Convergence since 1980s? • Singapore reconsidered its development strategy – economy diversified from manufacturing to financial and professional services – aims to surpass Hong Kong as an international center of finance & business HQ – government relaxed intervention in economy – free capital flows and foreign investment even after Asian Financial Crisis of 1997 Convergence since 1980s? • Hong Kong government moved in the opposite direction • became more interventionist • to cope with the political uncertainty during the negotiations between PRC and UK • intervened in stock and currency market – has linked HK$ to US$ since 1983 Convergence after crisis?