Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Joint Staff Assessment Report (JSAR) Assessment of Progress on JAM Implementation PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF THE IMF, WORLD BANK AND UN Third Sudan Consortium Oslo, May 5-7, 2008 Outline of the Presentation Economic and Social Progress since the signing of CPA Progress Toward MDGs Macroeconomic Situation Resource Mobilization, Public Expenditure and Public Financial Management Adherence to Financial Obligations for the JAM Projects: GONU and GOSS Donors Looking Forward (2008-11) Systemic Constraints / Challenges Financing Development Progress Towards MDGs Sudan faced a set of complex and deep-seated developmental challenges at the time of signing of the CPA MDG Indicators: Sudan (2006) vs. Average of the Low Income Countries (2005) M aternal mo rtality ratio , per 100,000 live births 120% B irths attended by qualified health perso nnel (%) 100% Net attendance rate (%) 80% 60% 40% M easles immunisatio n co verage (%) 20% Use o f impro ved so urces o f drinking water (%) 0% A nti-malarial treatment (under-fives) (%) Use o f impro ved sanitatio n facilities (%) Lo w Inco me Co untries (average)- Indexed at 100% Underweight prevalence (%) Under five mo rtality rate, per 1000 live births Sudan (2006) Progress Towards MDGs Selected Key Achievements (2005-2007) : Northern Sudan Education: The gross enrolment rate in four states reached over 80%; Survival rate to grade 5 reached 94.2% in 2006; 540 classrooms constructed. Health: DPT3 coverage reached 84%; more than 90% of children under five received one dose of measles; 782 new health facilities (42 hospitals, 352 primary health centres and 388 health units) constructed; 712,000 long lasting ITNs distributed free. HIV/AIDS Prevention/Control: Voluntary Counseling and Testing centres has increased from one in 2001 to more than 45 in 2006 and the number of treatment centres increased from just one in 2001 to 14 in 2006. Prevention of mother to child transmission services has been initiated in three priority states. Water and Sanitation: Safe drinking water sources provided for an additional 2.07 million rural population; non-functioning water sources re-established to serve 2.1 million people. Progress Towards MDGs Increased spending in health and education + ongoing decentralization initiatives Improved utilization of public services 100 100 measles vaccination (North Sudan) 90 90 2007 80 70 % under-5 children % children 12-23 months 80 2000 60 50 40 30 60 50 40 2000 30 20 10 10 0 0 2 3 quintile 4 highest 2007 70 20 lowest ARI brought to qualified health provider (North Sudan) lowest 2 3 quintile 4 highest Progress Towards MDGs Selected Key Achievements (2005-2007) : Southern Sudan Education: Enrolment in primary schools increased from around 300,000 in 2005 to over a million in 2007; Over 14,000 primary and secondary teachers had been recruited, and now over 25,000 teachers are estimated to be working in Southern Sudan. Health: Distribution of bed nets increased from 253,000 in 2005 to an estimated one million in 2007; The number of people treated with Artemisinin Combination Therapy in 2006 reached around 500,000; The Mass Measles Campaign, launched in 2005, had by 2007 reached some 3.2 million people—75% of all children under 15. HIV/AIDS: Voluntary Counseling and Testing services have expanded from around nine centers in 2005 to more than 40 in 2007 covering some 20 towns; Anti-Retroviral drugs are now available in four hospitals. Water and Sanitation :1,400 new water points constructed and 2000 boreholes rehabilitated; A $80m rural water supply project is under implementation; 25,000 latrines for households and schools constructed; and Over a million people oriented to hygienic practices. Progress Towards MDGs: …Yet what has been achieved, pales in significance to what remains to be done Disparity in MDG Indicators Across States in 2006 Use o f impro ved sanitatio n facilities (%) 300% Underweight prevalence (%) Net attendance rate (%) 250% 200% Use o f impro ved so urces o f drinking water (%) 150% B irths attended by qualified health perso nnel (%) 100% 50% Under five mo rtality rate, per 1000 live births 0% A nti-malarial treatment (under-fives) (%) Survival rate to grade 5 (%) Under-fives sleeping under ITNs (%) M aternal mo rtality ratio , per 100,000 live births M easles immunisatio n co verage (%) Gender parity index (basic educatio n) B est perfo rming relative to natio nal average Wo rst perfo rming relative to natio nal average Macroeconomic Situation Sudan has been a top growth performer in the region, with oil sector playing a pivotal role A verage real GDP gro wth rate (2003-2006) 14 Co ntributio n to Real GDP Gro wth 14.8 Chad 12 Sudan* 9.3 Ethio pia Uganda 2.8 10 7.5 4.2 5.5 Oil 8 Kenya 5.0 1.2 Egypt 4.8 Rwanda 1.0 4.0 Libya 8.7 4 No n-o il 6.7 6.4 6.0 3.5 4.2 2 Eritrea 0.0 6 2.0 0 *2005 - 2007. 5 10 15 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Economic growth has been strong by regional standards Benefits of increased oil production and higher international prices Positive spill-over from oil sector—particularly in construction and services sectors Recent increase in food prices a potential risk to macroeconomic stability Macroeconomic Policies Sudan’s Fiscal Position Revenue, Expenditure and Fiscal Deficit (% o f GDP ) 24.3% 25% 23.4% 23.0% Expenditure Fiscal Deficit 21.7% 20% 19.7% 20.0% 19.9% Revenue Fiscal position has deteriorated during 2005–07 and there has been a significant build-up of domestic arrears Monetary and exchange rate policies remained prudent, but private sector credit growth has fallen Financial sector indicators have deteriorated in recent years 18.2% 16.0% 15% 15.3% 12.8% After a sharp increase in 2005–06, the external current account has improved slightly in 2007 11.6% 11.9% 10% 10.7% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 The external debt arrears constrain access to concessional finance Resource Mobilization, Public Expenditure and Financial Management: GONU Trend and composition of revenue and expenditure for GONU – 2005 to 2007 Expenditure ( in m illions of $) Revenue ( in m illions of $) 14000 10,000 9,123 8,970 Total 9,000 11,759 12000 7,877 10,456 8,000 7,002 Tax Revenue 7,000 6,000 5,225 Total 9,606 10000 8,403 Transfer to States 8000 4,994 Non-Tax Revenue 5,000 5,950 5,877 Capital 6000 4,000 4000 3,000 Operating Oil Revenue 2,000 2000 Salaries 1,000 0 - B udget A ctual B udget A ctual B udget A ctual Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 Revenue: Managing the volatility of oil revenue flow remains critical; Raising the level of non-oil revenue to GDP ratio is important for long-term fiscal sustainability. Expenditure: Surge in CPA related spending (including transfer to states) has led to sharp increase in expenditure; Execution rate was 88% in 2006 and 89% in 2007; and Poverty-reducing spending increased significantly from 3.4% of GDP in 2004 to 6% in 2007; Considerable scope to improve budget execution and the quality of spending. Resource Mobilization, Public Expenditure and Financial Management: GOSS Trend and composition of revenue and expenditure for GOSS – 2005 to 2007 R e v e nue ( in m illio ns o f US $ ) 1,800 1,800 1,534 1,600 1,408 1,400 1,304 To tal No n-o il Revenue 1,223 1,200 1,000 1,600 E xpe ndit ure ( in m illio ns o f US $ ) 1652 1574 1531 1503 1,400 To tal Develo pment 1,200 1,000 822 Oil Revenue 800 800 600 600 400 400 200 200 - A ctual 2005 B udget A ctual 2006 B udget A ctual 2007 Operating 295 A ctual 2005 Salaries B udget A ctual 2006 B udget A ctual 2007 Revenue. Diversification of revenue base is essential to fiscal sustainability; Non-oil revenue collection has been minuscule, especially relative to potential. Expenditure. Wage bill growth and increase in operating expenses have adversely affected development spending; Improving budget execution and strengthening the financial management practices are critical to raise the effectiveness of public expenditure. Adherence to Financial Obligations for the JAM Projects: GONU Expenditure: Planned vs. Actual (in m illions of US$) 1,140 Basic social services 703 735 Three Areas 39 386 390 Productive sectors 318 Infrastructure 960 285 Livelihood/social protect 65 128 Economic policy Aggregate JAM Estimate = US$3.2 billion 80 Aggregate Actual Spending = US$2.8 bln 96 Governance/ rule of law 11 56 39 Capacity building/ inst dev Actual JAM Estimate 49 Information/stats 20 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 GONU obligations in the JAM across the eight clusters were estimated at $3.2 billion Execution rate has been impressive (88%), but under-spending in 6 of the 8 JAM sectors (exceptions are infrastructure and productive sectors) Spending on ‘Three Areas’ has been significantly low Adherence to Financial Obligations for the JAM Projects: GOSS JA M Expenditure: P lanned vs. A ctual (in millio ns o f US$ ) 1,600 1437 1,400 1,200 JA M Estimate A ctual 1,000 800 644 600 551 530 400 294 263 257 200 2005 2006 2007 To tal 2005-2007 Against a commitment of US$ 1.4 billion, GOSS contribution to JAM projects was US$ 551 million This was largely due to revenue under-runs, greater salary and operating expenses than assumed in the JAM report and shortfalls in donor funds Relatively higher execution rate for infrastructure sector (79%), relative to basic social services (35%) Adherence to Financial Obligations for the JAM Projects: Donors Actual Donor Contribution in Phase -1: 2005-07 (in US$ m illion) 6,000 5,000 165 170 Recovery and Development (Others) Recovery and Development (MDTF) 4,000 1016 Humanitarian (Others) 133 Humanitarian (UN) 3,000 537 349 1,699 555 1161 237 397 1,912 5,342 1145 2,000 148 1,000 239 3089 416 1,731 929 2005 2006 2007 2005-07 (Cumulative) While donors contribution has been lower than the JAM estimates, it has been significantly higher than the pledges made at Oslo in 2005. The ability of the donors to allocate significant funds for recovery and development activities has been constrained by large and expanding humanitarian aid. Systemic Constraints / Challenges Sudan’s development has been (continues to be) affected by: domestic conflicts, resource curse, geography (large parts of the country are far from the coast), and poverty traps. The development needs are huge and the potential is considerable. It calls for: More effective decentralization Reduced disparity in resource allocation Improved policy and quality of institutions Enabling environment for rapid and shared growth Greater involvement of private sector and CSOs Continued support of international development partners Need for a broad-based, inclusive development framework that is supported by good policies and adequate funding.