Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Woodrow Wilson Center – American University Washington, D.C. June 2012 Outline • Chapter 1: A decade of turbulence • Chapter 2: Fiscal revenues and expenditures: structure and implications for inequality • Chapter 3: Fiscal revenues and expenditures evolution • Chapter 4: Fiscal challenges from a political perspective • Final remarks Chapter 1 A DECADE OF TURBULENCE A decade of turbulence • Three phases of a decade of turbulence: deceleration, expansion and crisis • The most severe crisis in the last 30 years • Services have become the engine of economic growth, boost by family remittances, tourism, FDI and exports • However, economic growth was low in labor intensive sectors • Poverty was reduced slowly (2001-2007) • Due to the severity of the crisis, the achievements reached in poverty reduction were reversed Three phases of the decade of turbulence 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 8.3 Annual average rate of Economic Growth 6.6 (Percentages) 6.3 5.0 3.8 2.0 2.2 1.9 2.0 4.3 3.7 3.0 4.9 1.6 2.1 1.9 1.4 -0.2 Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Phase I Source: Icefi, based on official data. Honduras Phase II Nicaragua Phase III Panamá …with the most severe crisis in the last 30 years 14.0 Annual Rate of Economic Growth (Percentages) 12.0 10.0 8.0 10.1 7.9 7.5 6.3 6.0 4.0 12.1 2.7 4.2 3.8 1.3 2.0 6.2 3.3 1.4 4.2 2.8 2.8 3.6 2.8 4.5 3.2 0.5 (2.0) (1.3) (4.0) Costa Rica (3.1) El Salvador Guatemala 2007 Source: Icefi, based on official data. 2008 (2.1) Honduras 2009 2010 (1.5) Nicaragua Panamá Services have become the engine of economic growth Contributions to economic growth by economic sector (2000-2009) (Economic growth rate points) Primary Sector Industry Services 5.7 6 5 4 3.5 2.6 3 2 1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.7 CR SV 0.4 0.5 0.1 0 Source: Icefi, based on official data. GT 1.1 0.8 0.9 HN NI PA 2.9 1.5 …boosted by family remittances, tourism, FDI or exports (with different levels of intensity) Comparision between remittances flows, FDI, exports and tourism (2001-2010) (As a percentage of total flows) SV HN NI GT PA CR 0% 20% 40% Remittances Source: Icefi, based on official data. 60% Tourism Exports 80% FDI 100% …boosted by family remittances, tourism, FDI or exports (with different levels of intensity) Comparison between remittances flows, FDI, exports and tourism (2001-2010) (As a percentage of GDP) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 CR PA Remittances Fuente: Icefi, basada en datos oficiales. GT NI Tourism HN FDI Exports SV Due to the severity of the crisis, the achievements reached in poverty reduction were reversed Headcount poverty index by lack of consumption or income (2001-2010) (as a percentage of total households or individuals) 70 60 Guatemala 50 Nicaragua 40 Panamá Costa Rica 30 El Salvador 20 Honduras 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: Icefi, based on official data. The big challenges (1) 1. Complementary role of fiscal and macroeconomic policies – Role of fiscal policy in promoting economic growth – Counter cyclical policy that moderates impacts of economic shocks – Improve coordination between fiscal and monetary policy – Big space for cooperation in Central America • No only economic integration • Regional public goods Capítulo 2 FISCAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: STRUCTURE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INEQUALITY IN THE REGION Structure of fiscal revenues and expenditures: implications for inequality • Public expenditure is a key tool to reduce inequality – In Central American countries (CAC) exist a relation between lower poverty and higher levels of public social expenditures – Social expenditures in education and health benefit more the poor in CAC • Tax system could prevent more inequality and it’s the main source of funds for public expenditure • The impact of tax system in the income distribution is low because the low collection of direct taxes – – – – Low revenues from Personal Income Tax High levels of fiscal benefits for a few (like tax exemptions) High levels of income tax evasion Almost inexistent real estate taxes Structure of fiscal revenues and expenditures: implications for inequality • Fiscal revenues depend mainly on taxation, specially in the lowest fiscal revenues countries in the region (El Salvador, Guatemala) • A reduced group of countries have diversified its fiscal revenues sources, beyond taxes and grants (Panama, Costa Rica) • Level and composition of public expenditure have notable differences between Central American Countries • Allocation of resources to social expenditure was a priority, even on crisis years • Social expenditure structure – Education and health: the main targets – Social protection: the big difference Public expenditure is a key tool for inequality reduction Completion of primary education (%) Individuals or households in poverty (%) Poverty and per capita public social expenditure 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 500 Per capita public social expenditure (USD 2000) Source: Icefi, based on official data and ECLAC. 1,000 Completion of elementary education and per capita public spending in 100 education 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Per capita public social expenditure in education (2000 USD) 300 Public expenditure in health and education benefits the poor in Central America Education (% of public expenditure in education) Health (% of public expenditure in health) 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% -10% CR SV GT Poorest 40% Source: Icefi, based in Barreix, Bes and Roca (2009) HN Richest 20% NI PA -10% CR SV GT Poorest 40% HN Richest 20% NI PA Tax system has a low redistributive impact Gini Index change Decrease -> 3.0 2.0 Inequalty 1.0 - <--Increase (1.0) (2.0) (3.0) CR Source: Icefi, based in Barreix, Bes and Roca (2009) SV GT HN NI PA … mainly because of the low collection of direct taxes Direct taxes participation (% total) International comparison of tax structure (% GDP) 18 60.0 51 16 51 50.0 14 40.0 36 34 30.0 34 32 30 36 30 30 26 25 12 10 8 23 22 6 20.0 4 10.0 2 0 CR SV GT Phase I HN Phase II NI PA Phase III Source: Icefi, based in official data and Gómez-Sabaini, Jimenez and Podestá (2010). Promedio Direct Indirect Social Contributions OECD EU USA Southeast Asia Africa Latin America Central America The redistributive effect of taxes and transfers is much higher in Europe than in Latin America Central America = -3.7% USA=-16.6% Source: ECLAC, based on Goñi, López and Serven (2008) The low collection of direct taxes is explained by… • • • • Low revenues from personal income tax High tax exemptions High income tax evasion Others (weak tax administration, political factors) Fiscal revenues depend mainly on taxation, especially in countries with the lowest fiscal revenue Fiscal revenues NFPS (% GDP) Fiscal revenue structure (% total ) 35.0 30.0 29.7 GT 29.5 25.7 25.0 SV 24.5 HN 20.0 16.8 15.0 NI 12.2 CR 10.0 PA 5.0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% HN Source: Icefi, based on official data. NI CR PA SV GT Taxes Social Security Other Grants Level and composition of public expenditure has notable differences Public expenditure NFPS (% GDP) Public expenditure categories (% total) PA NI HN GT SV CR 0% 20% 40% Wages Transfers Capital expenditures Interest Fuente: Icefi, basada en datos oficiales. 60% 80% 100% Allocation of resources to social expenditure was a priority, even on crisis years Macroeconomic priority (% GDP) Budget priority (% total public expenditure) 25.0 80.0 70.0 20.0 60.0 50.0 15.0 40.0 10.0 30.0 20.0 5.0 10.0 - - CR SV Phase I Fuente: Icefi, basada en datos oficiales. GT Phase II HN NI Phase III PA CR SV Phase I GT Phase II HN NI Phase III PA Social expenditure structure : education and health, main targets; social protection, big difference As a percentage of public social expenditure (2001-2010) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 29 30 0 3 21 19 32 26 1 8 32 1 2 20 27 34 35 59 30 26 32 CR SV GT Education Fuente: Icefi, basada en datos oficiales. Health HN Social protection 32 27 NI PA Housing Other The big challenges (2) 2. The challenge of raising more tax revenues remains – Recent progress on direct taxation is important, but still there is a long way to advance in tax administration, tax evasion, and elusion reduction – Real estate taxes, a tool to strength local government finances – Explore fiscal revenues diversification: better management of public enterprises, public assets and other non tax revenues The big challenges (3) 3. Promote greater equity in public expenditure – Improving level and allocation of social expenditure, now with institutional strengthening – Face new challenges like climate change and insecurity – Continuous evaluation of social programs and infrastructure projects, with better beneficiaries identification Capítulo 3 FISCAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES EVOLUTION Main findings • Improved fiscal revenues: sustainable? • Public expenditure growth – Wages and transfers grew during the crisis – Public investment was sacrificed • Strong relationship between revenues?, fiscal deficit and economic performance – Fiscal revenue highly dependant on imports • Debt outlook is better than a decade ago: external debt was reduced and created fiscal space to face the crisis • Three fiscal sustainability scenarios Improved fiscal revenues: sustainable? Total Fiscal revenue (2001-2010) (% GDP) Central American average Tax Burden 1990-2010 (% GDP) 35 15 30 14 25 13 20 12 15 11 10 5 10 0 9 CR ES Phase I Source: Icefi, based on official data. GT HN Phase II NI Phase III PA 8 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 Public expenditure growth: wages and transfers up, investment down Expenditure change in anti-crisis plans Central government (% GDP) (% GDP) NFPS 4 I II III CR 27.7 25.7 29.4 SV 18.1 18.1 20.8 GT 14.2 14.2 14.1 1 HN 29.2 30.0 34.2 0 NI 24.6 27.5 31.3 PA 26.0 25.4 26.2 3 2 -1 -2 Wages Source: Icefi, based on official data. Transfers Capital Interest CR SV GT HN NI Strong relationship between fiscal revenues, fiscal deficit, and economic performance Deficit increase in 2009, according to revenues or expenses Deficit (% of GDP) CR SV GT HN 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -3.5 -4.0 -4.5 -5.0 PA 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% -25% CR I Source: Icefi, based on official data. NI II III ES GT HN Revenues NI PA Strong response of fiscal revenue to business cycle, highly dependant of imports Fiscal revenue growth Taxes linked to imports 15 50% 45% 10 40% 5 35% 0 30% 25% -5 20% -10 15% -15 CR SV GT II Source: Icefi, based on official data. HN III NI PA 10% CR 2007 SV GT 2008 HN 2009 NI PA 2010 Debt outlook is better than a decade ago: external debt was reduced and created fiscal space to face the crisis NFPS Country Fuente: Icefi, basada en datos oficiales. 1991-2000 2001-2010 Total Internal External Total Internal External CR 41.8 26.9 14.9 39.4 24.7 14.7 ES 29.1 8.4 20.7 39.7 12.2 27.5 GT 21.7 6.9 14.9 21.8 8.0 13.8 HN 71.4 2.6 71.2 38.8 4.2 34.6 NI 195.9 195.9 82.0 18.5 65.4 PA 77.0 59.4 59.6 13.2 46.3 17.6 Three sustainability scenarios 1. Orthodox Fiscal adjustment – Non viable 2. Financial sustainability – – – Public sector financing at current level Gradual and progressive reforms in revenue and expenditure Fiscal deficits around business cycles (with rules) 3. Sustainability with equality and growth – – – More fiscal revenues Transparency Equality and economic growth Chapter 4 FISCAL CHALLENGES FROM A POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE Main findings • Public sector reforms are very hard to achieve due to political factors • Key role of Legislative Branch • Tax structure strongly influenced by economic elites and their State role paradigm • Fiscal reform great challenge: how to make alliances Public sector reforms are very hard to achieve due to political factors Tax reforms are the best example • Ambitious reforms are very hard to be approved • Actors’ roles, power shares and interests determine reforms outcomes – State branches – Economic elites – Popular sectors Proposed and approved reforms (2008-2011) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 CR SV GT Approved Source: Icefi, based on official data. HN Non aproved NI PA Actors, institutions and processes • Legislative Branch central role – Growing political parties fragmentation – Reform approval more difficult in countries with more fragmented political parties • Economic elites and their power exercise – Their influence on State configuration models – Influence on the tax structure – Tax incentives vs. Public expenditure The great challenge: finding allies • First pillar: recover citizen trust on public sector – Real and verifiable actions can reduce citizen distrust, via transparency and anticorruption measures promotion – Campaigning to communicate the results achieved • Second pillar: allies search – Emergent elites interests – Popular sectors – Look for pro-reform coalitions Summing up Final remarks: the big challenges 1. 2. 3. 4. Economic challenges The challenge of raising revenues remains Promote greater equity in social expenditure (+) Political challenges – Fiscal reforms approval by fragmented legislatives – Influence of economic elites and limited vision on competitiveness (only demand tax exemptions) – Transnational elites involvement demands incentives and motivations to distance themselves from traditional opposition and to contribuite State strengthening through fiscal reform – Prevent clientelistic practices on policies addressed to popular sectors – Earn medium class trust on State