Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Public Expenditure in Latin America: Trends and Key Policy Issues Benedict Clements Western Hemisphere Department International Monetary Fund* ECLAC Fiscal Policy Seminar Santiago de Chile January 29, 2007 * The views expressed herein are those of the author and should not be attributed to the IMF, its Executive Board, or its management. Outline Latin American Public Spending: A Discontinuous March Upward Key Expenditure Issues for the Region The Reform Agenda: Making Government Expenditure More Efficient and Equitable 2 Outline Latin American Public Spending: A Discontinuous March Upward Key Expenditure Issues for the Region The Reform Agenda: Making Government Expenditure More Efficient and Equitable 3 Trends in Public Spending Fiscal balances have improved in the region in recent years Latin America: Fiscal Trends 3.0 2.5 (In percent of GDP) Primary Balances (LHS) Primary Expenditures (RHS) 2.0 30 28 Revenues (RHS) 26 1.5 1.0 24 0.5 22 0.0 -0.5 20 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 4 Trends in Public Spending Primary spending, however, has resumed its upward drift Latin America: Primary Public Spending by Region (In percent of GDP) 30 Latin American Average South America & Mexico 27 Central America 24 21 18 15 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 5 Trends in Public Spending Real spending has followed a procyclical pattern Latin America: Real GDP, Revenues, and Primary Spending (Annual percent change) 12 Real Revenues 10 Real Primary Expenditures Real GDP 8 6 4 2 0 -2 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 6 Trends in Public Spending Current spending has driven the rise in outlays... Latin America: Public Sector Expenditures (In percent of GDP) 20 6.5 Current Primary Expenditures (LHS) Capital Expenditures (RHS) 19 6.0 18 5.5 17 5.0 16 4.5 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 7 Trends in Public Spending …while capital spending has fallen as a share of outlays Latin America: Average Public Sector Capital Spending (In percent of primary expenditures) 40 35 30 1995-1999 2000-2006 25 20 15 10 5 0 LA Average South America and Mexico Central America 8 Outline Latin American Public Spending: A Discontinuous March Upward Key Expenditure Issues for the Region Cyclicality of spending Public investment Public employment Social spending The Reform Agenda: Making Government Expenditure More Efficient and Equitable 9 Cyclicality of Spending Expenditure is procyclical in all spending categories Capital outlays are the most procyclical Compared to other developing countries, a higher share of LA countries have procyclical spending LA countries also have somewhat higher coefficients Estimates of the Short-Run Response of Spending to Output Shocks Total Spending Primary Spending Current Spending Wages and Salaries Capital Spending Latin America 1.57 1.79 1.22 1.52 5.91 Share of Latin American countries with sig. coeff. 46.2 66.7 33.3 46.2 69.1 Share sig. for 35 other dev. countries 31.3 40.0 40.0 28.1 45.2 Avg. coeff. for 35 other dev. countries 1.18 1.75 1.03 1.20 1.38 Source: Akitoby and others (2006). 10 Cyclicality of Spending There is no evidence of asymmetry Response of Expenditure to Output Gaps Dependent Variable: Primary expenditure to GDP Output gap has a statistically significant impact on spending Positive and negative output gaps have different coefficients, but the difference is not statistically significant System GMM regressions Lagged dependent variable 0.44 (3.06)*** Output gap 0.08 (2.30)*** 0.49 (3.50)*** Output gap (when positive) -0.08 (0.72) Output gap (when negative) 0.17 (1.78)* Log terms of trade 0.03 (0.01) * Significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%. -0.25 (0.09) 11 Public Investment Public investment is lower than in other developing regions Public Investment in Latin America and Other Regions, 1990 – 2006 1990 – 94 1995 – 99 2000 – 04 2005 – 06 Latin America 4.7 4.9 4.3 4.5 Africa 7.9 7.7 7.6 8.2 Asia 9.1 8.7 8.1 8.4 Central and Eastern Europe 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 12 Public Investment Not all countries in the region, however, suffer infrastructure “lags” Latin America: Infrastructural Performance ― Deviation of Actual Indices from Values Predicted by PPP-adjusted Per Capita Income (In percent of the average standard deviation of the residuals) Infrastructure Panama El Salvador Chile Guatemala Uruguay Honduras Brazil Colombia Mexico Costa Rica Ecuador Venezuela Peru Nicaragua Argentina Bolivia Paraguay -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 13 Public Investment Infrastructure lags may also reflect inefficiencies in public investment Efficiency can be assessed by evaluating the link between public investment and improvements in infrastructure First step is to evaluate relationship between total infrastructure spending (public and private) and improvements in infrastructure using a nonparametric technique 14 Public Investment (improvements in infrastructure indicators) Output Infrastructure Production Possibility Frontier Efficient C A Y(A) Y(B) D b X(A) b’ B Less Efficient X(B) The most efficient countries are those on the “production frontier” (ACD) Input (infrastructure spending to GDP) 15 Public Investment Efficiency varies by country Aggregated Public Efficiency Scores Adjusted Public Adjusted Efficiency 1/ 2/ Rank Adjusted Level of Public Efficiency Mexico 0.824 1 High Chile 0.732 2 High Peru 0.598 3 Medium Argentina 0.530 4 Medium Brazil 0.432 5 Medium Colombia 0.253 6 Low Bolivia 0.036 7 Low 1/ Efficiency in various sectors (transport, electricity, water, telecommunications) aggregated using the share of public investment in each applicable sector. 2/ Adjusted by the effect of private sector spending on the efficiency score in each sector. 16 Public Sector Employment Public wage expenditure and employment are not high by world standards… Government Wages and Employment in Latin America and Other Regions, 2004 or latest year Wages, as a percent of GDP General government employment as percent of total employed, 1990s Latin America 7.0 20.4 Asia 5.7 17.2 Eastern Europe and Central Asia 7.9 42.3 Middle East and North Africa 10.6 50.3 Sub-Saharan Africa 9.6 28.4 OECD 12.1 21.0 17 Public Sector Employment …but the quality of government services remains low The Quality of the Bureaucracy Government Effectiveness (ICRG Index, 1990-2005) (In percentile rank, 1996-2005) 4.0 3.5 3.0 Latin America Asia Eastern Europe & Baltics Subsaharan Africa 80 Latin America Asia 70 Eastern Europe & Baltics Subsaharan Africa 60 2.5 50 2.0 40 1.5 1.0 30 0.5 20 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 1996 1998 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 18 Public Sector Employment Wide variance in wage bills and quality of civil service No relationship between wage bill and quality of civil service Institutional weaknesses remain in many countries (IADB, 2005 and Echerbarría and Cortázar, 2005): Patronage in hiring and promotions Absence of performance evaluation Internal inequities in remuneration 19 Social Spending Social spending absorbs a high share of government outlays Health and education spending in line with other regions Social protection spending lower than OECD but higher than emerging Asia Inefficiencies in spending have retarded gains in social indicators Poverty remains high despite substantial social spending General Government Social Spending in Latin America and Other Regions, 2004 Education Health Social protection Total 1/ Latin America 4.2 2.6 5.4 12.7 Emerging Asia 3.5 1.3 2.2 8.4 Eastern Europe and Central Asia 4.8 4.4 12.1 22.8 Middle East and North Africa 4.2 2.0 1.8 9.1 Sub-Saharan Africa 5.5 2.9 3.7 13.8 OECD 6.4 6.9 17.3 32.6 1/ Total includes housing and community amenities. 20 Social Spending The distributive effects of social spending varies Social spending in Latin America is regressive – poorest 20% receive less than a fifth of the benefits Tertiary education and social security spending largely benefit highincome groups Primary education and social assistance spending primarily benefit the poor Latin America: Distribution of Benefits from Social Spending to the Top and Bottom Quintiles Poorest Quintile Richest Quintile 20.2 20.4 Primary 29.0 7.9 Secondary 13.2 18.3 Tertiary 1.9 52.1 Health 20.6 52.1 Social security 5.6 17.6 Total social spending 15.0 30.4 Shares of quintile in primary income 3.6 56.4 Education Source: ECLAC 21 Social Spending The success of targeted social assistance programs Conditional cash transfer programs have expanded in recent years Benefits have been well-targeted to the poor and have helped reduce poverty rates However, these programs remain modest in size (1 to 1 ½ % of GDP) and are a small share of social spending 22 Outline Latin American Public Spending: A Discontinuous March Upward Key Expenditure Issues for the Region The Reform Agenda: Making Government Expenditure More Efficient and Equitable 23 Taming cyclicality Reducing spending growth during current cyclical upswing a key challenge Fiscal rules to reduce spending growth could be helpful -- but need to be backed by effective enforcement Reducing spending volatility will help improve the efficiency of spending 24 Making government spending more efficient Infrastructure lags reflect inefficiencies in public investment Large efficiency gains possible by adopting best practices of most efficient countries Quality of civil service varies widely Reform efforts to tackle institutional weaknesses 25 Improving the equity of spending Continued reform of social insurance schemes Make education spending more pro-poor Increase user fees in tertiary education, combined with scholarships for low-income households Improve quality of secondary education to reduce repetition rates and broaden access to tertiary level Expand targeted social assistance programs 26