Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2011 Innovation and growth in knowledge economies Cc The value of the STI Scoreboard Wide-ranging resource book of indicators Tracks global trends to inform policy making Broad scope – includes BRIICS Timely: 2011 context – innovation as part of solution for sustainable growth The STI Scoreboard 2011 Knowledge economies – trends and features Building knowledge Connecting to knowledge Targeting new growth areas Unleashing innovation in firms Competing in the global economy Cc Today’s presentation 2011 context EU assets: science, technology, innovation Main productivity and innovation challenges 2011 context Employment losses per sector Where people lost their jobs, selected countries, 2009-10 Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity Agriculture, forestry and fishing Construction Finance, insurance, real estate and business services % 125 100 75 50 25 0 -25 -50 -75 -100 -125 3 8 28 67 8 7 62 164 Mining, manufacturing and utilities Wholesale, retail, hotels, transport and communications Community, social and personal services 74 14 197 361 53 51 56 1118 539 Gains, thousands Losses, thousands -30 -87 -504 -127 -69 -84 -244 -374 -115 -23 -153 -142 -23 -11 -6 -1961 -5999 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Structural Analysis (STAN) Database, OECD National Accounts (SNA) Database and national statistical institutes, June 2011. Globalisation of manufacturing Top manufacturers in the last 20 years, 1990, 2000 and 2009 Percentage share of total world manufacturing value added % 1990 % 2000 2009 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on United Nations Statistical Division, National Accounts Main Aggregates Database, May 2011. Emerging players in high-tech. trade OECD and BRIICS manufacturing trade by technology intensity, 1995-2009 Index 1995 = 100 BRIICS Total manuf. BRIICS High-tech. manuf. OECD Total manuf. OECD High-tech. manuf. Index 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, STAN Bilateral Trade Database (BTD), May 2011. 2007 2008 2009 Economies are specialising Value added of the top four industries, G7 , 1980-2009 As a percentage of total value added (excluding real estate and the public sector) % 65 60 United States 55 United Kingdom France Italy 50 45 Canada Japan Germany 40 0 35 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Structural Analysis Database (STAN), May 2011. c The balance sheet: which assets & strategies can help? Assets in the knowledge economy Building a critical mass in science Researchers, per thousand employment R&D Volumes in 2000 USD constant prices and PPP 16.0 Finland BRIICS North America EU27 Other OECD members 1 Billion 10 Billion 14.0 Iceland R&D in OECD and non-OECD economies, 2009 or latest available year Denmark 100 Billion 12.0 Japan Sweden Norway New-Zealand United States 10.0 Portugal Korea France Canada Austria Australia United Kingdom Belgium Estonia Ireland Slovenia Spain Luxembourg 8.0 Slovak Republic 6.0 Russian Federation Netherlands Switzerland Czech Republic Hungary Greece 4.0 Poland Germany European Union Italy Turkey 2.0 Source: OECD, STI Scoreboard 2011 based on Main Science and Technology Indicators Database, June 2011. Mexico China Chile South Africa 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Gross domestic expenditures on R&D as a percentage of GDP EU contribution to global HRST talent Science and engineering graduates at the doctorate level in the OECD area, 2009 By country of graduation Australia Other countries 6.4% 2.6% Canada 3.3% Korea 3.8% Japan 7.2% EU 50.4% United States 26.3 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Education Database, September 2011 and on Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), May 2011. Innovation is much broader than R&D… Product innovators by R&D status 2006-2008 % R&D-active firms Firms without R&D 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on Eurostat (CIS-2008) and national data sources, June 2011. Investment in intangibles Investment in fixed and intangible assets as a percentage of GDP, 2006 % Machinery and equipment Software and databases R&D and other intellectual property products Brand equity, firm-specific human capital, organisational capital 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011. Data on intangible investment are based on COINVEST [www.coinvest.org.uk] and national estimates by researchers. Data for fixed investment are OECD calculations based on OECD, Annual National Accounts and EU KLEMS Databases, March 2010. Collaboration and innovation Firms engaged in innovation collaboration by R&D status, 2006-08 As a percentage of R&D-active and R&D non-active firms R&D-active firms Firms without R&D % 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on Eurostat (CIS-2008) and national data sources, June 2011. Geographical concentration and innovation Innovation hotspots in ICT, biotechnologies and nanotechnologies, 2006-08 Share Shareofofregion regioninincountry's country's biotechnology biotechnologyand andnanotechnology nanotechnologypatents patents(%) (%) 100 100 Etela-Suomi (FIN) Total Totalpatents patentsbybyregion region Capital Region (KOR) Vlaams Gewest Hovedstaden (DNK) Hovedstaden (DNK) 1 1000 000patents patents (BEL) Southern KantoWien (JPN) 10 2 000 500patents patents West-Nederland West-Nederland (NLD) (NLD) 50 15000 000patents patents (AUT) de France Île de Île France (FRA) (FRA) California Lombardia (ITA) Chungcheong Region (USA) Rhône-Alpes (KOR) (FRA) Eastern (GBR) Nordrhein-Westfalen Nordrhein-Westfalen (DEU) (DEU) Massachusetts (USA) 1010 Maryland (USA) Pennsylvania (USA) Niedersachsen (DEU) New Jersey (USA) North Carolina (USA) (CAN) Zuid-Nederland (NLD) Stockholm Bayern (DEU)(SWE) Bayern (DEU) SouthEast East(GBR) (GBR) South Hessen Tokai(GBR) (JPN) London (DEU) Scotland (GBR) Berlin (DEU) Zuid-Nederland (NLD) Ontario Baden-Wuerttemberg Baden-Württemberg (DEU) (DEU) Provence-AlpesCôte D'Azur (FRA) New York (USA) Guangdong (CHN) Texas (USA) Washington (USA) Illinois (USA) Minnesota (USA) 11 11 10 10 Axes Axesininlogarithmic logarithmicscale scale Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, REGPAT Database, June 2011. 100 100 Share Shareofofregion regioninincountry's country's ICT-related ICT-relatedpatents patents(%) (%) Emerging technological innovation Countries’ share of patents for energy generation from renewable and non-fossil sources, 2007-09 % 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Patent Database, May 2011. Challenges for increased productivity and innovation Productivity Labour productivity growth at the total economy level, 1985-2010 Annual growth rates % Euro area United States Japan 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -1 -2 -3 -4 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Productivity Database, June 2011. Sweden Quality of patents declining Patent quality index by country 1990-2000 and 2000-2010 Composite index based on patents granted by the EPO Index Average 1990-2000 Average 2000-2010 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on the Worldwide Patent Statistical Database, EPO, April 2011. But countries build technological advantage Patent quality index by technology field, 2000-10 Patent quality index Country with the maximum patent quality index Solar energy Micro- and nano-tech. JPN Wind energy Fuel cells USA Food chemistry USA Thermal devices USA Other consumer goods Handling Semiconductors Measurement Chemical eng. Optics Engines, pumps, turbines Electrical machinery Polymers Audio-visual tech. Other machines Textile and paper machines Surface and coating Telecom. Materials, metallurgy Bio materials Basic comm. Environ. tech. Civil eng. Control devices Digital communication 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Index KOR CAN,KOR Computer tech. KOR AUS AUS Medical tech. AUS Transport KOR CAN NOR Organic chemistry Pharmaceuticals KOR 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Biotechnology 0.4 0.0 0.1 Index Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on the Worldwide Patent Statistical Database, EPO, April 2011. 0.2 0.3 0.4 Index Technology edge is shifting Revealed technological advantage, 1997-99 and 2007-09 Index based on patent applications filed under the PCT Index ICT Index 3.0 1.5 Biotechnologies 2.5 1.0 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Index 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Nanotechnologies Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Patent Database, May 2011. Technology edge in ICT OECD terrestrial mobile wireless broadband subscriptions by technology, June 2010 Satellite Terrestrial fixed wireless Standard mobile broadband subscriptions Dedicated mobile data subscriptions Subscriptions per 100 inhabitants 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Broadband Portal, June 2011. Non-technological innovation Service-related trademarks applications at USPTO and OHIM, 1997-99 and 2007-09 2007-09 1997-1999 % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on US Patent and Trademark Office (2011), “The USPTO Trademark Casefile Dataset (1884-2010)”; OHIM Community Trademark Database; CTM Download, April 2010; JPO (2008-2010), Annual Reports; OECD, National Accounts Database, June 2011; and IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, June 2011 Supporting business innovation Direct government fundingsupport of business R&D R&D Total government to business Direct government funding of business R&D and tax incentives for R&D, 2009 Indirect government support to business R&D (R&D tax incentives) GDP %%GDP 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 No data/cost estimate available 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD R&D tax incentives questionnaires, January 2010 and June 2011; and OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators Database, June 2011. In large but also small firms Government financed BERD by firm size 2009 As a percentage of total government-financed BERD % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Firms with fewer than 50 employees Firms with 50 to 249 employees Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD, Research and Development Database, May 2011. Patenting activity of young firms Patenting activity of young firms 2007-2009 % Share of patenting firms under 5 years old Share of patents filed by firms under 5 years old 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on the Worldwide Patent Statistical Database, EPO, April 2011; and ORBIS© Database, Bureau van Dijk Electronic Publishing, December 2010; matched using algorithms in the Imalinker system developed for the OECD by IDENER, Seville, 2011. Building knowledge centres of excellence University hotspots – geographical distribution of highest impact institutions 2009 Universities 50 45 40 35 USA 30 UK Other EU 25 Other OECD 200 Asia B*I*CS Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011 based on OECD and SCImago Research Group (CSIC) (forthcoming), Report on Scientific Production, based on Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, June 2011. Globalisation of STI talent International students enrolled in SE fields at the tertiary level, 2009 As a % of all international students at the tertiary level S&E enrolments at the tertiary level - 5A, 2009 As a % of all enrolments (domestic and international students) at the tertiary level - 5A % % 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 Source: OECD, Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators, OECD, Paris. Netherlands Japan Australia Italy United Kingdom Canada (2008) France Switzerland United States Germany Finland 0 Sweden Netherlands United States Australia Canada (2008) Japan Italy Switzerland United Kingdom Sweden France Germany 10 Finland 0 To finish…. How to stimulate innovation More international collaboration (research & firms) for higher impact Competitive markets – to encourage entrepreneurial firms as well as incumbents Knowledge networks and markets – managing flow and ensuring quality Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2011 Comments, questions, discussion www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard