Download Where are we going wrong? The story behind unneccessary

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Where are we going « wrong »?
• Lack of coordination between the disciplines
• Implication for the Patient
– Not informed on the next steps
– Not informed on when where and what by whom
(loss of autonomy)
– No guidelines publically available
• BUT does the medical training focus on
coordination or on being good in its
profession???
• Are the medical specialist well trained?? Huge
difference over Europe!
Where are we going « wrong »?
• Availability of guidelines on diagnosis and
treatment
• BUT are these evidence based? If so why are
they different between regions or countries??
• And what is evidence –based? what is the
right treatment? Personlised medicine
• GLs:Not applicable to all patients (how to
explain this to patients but also to insurance
companies)
Where are we going « wrong »?
• Depending on the GDP or NHE more or less
high tech equipments available: MRI,PET
scans, radiotherapy….but usually very
expensive drugs are available in poor
countries!!!
• Role (lobby) of pharmaceutical industries
EUROCARE-4
5-year relative survival, all cancers
countries are orded by Total Expenditure on Healh
Europe
Berrino F. et al, The Lancet Oncology, 2007
Where are we going « wrong »?
• What is a dedicated team? Or what is a
« good » hospital??
• How to measure this?
• Volume per specialist ??? Volume per
hospital?? NO: but volume per team
But how to deal with this in a poor country with
only a few inh/km2?
Model for comprehensive
oncological pathway
Where are we going « wrong »?
• Starting a population-based screening
programme (political decision)
– without any possibility to treat the referred
patient adequatly (no specialized surgeon, no
radiotherapy equipment…)
– Without any possibility of evaluation of the effect
of the screening (no monitor instrument as a CR
including stage)
Where are we going « wrong »?
• More survivors due to better survival: new
« problem »:
• Rehabilitation into the society
• Back to work
• Who can give this kind of support to the
patients? Who is paying for this?
Where are we going « wrong »?
• Antismoking campaigns? Not succesful
because of the lobby of the tobacco industry:
political issue!!!
• Health is less important than the economy:
« the cheapest patient is the one who dies
very fast, and never reaches his retirement »
In conclusion
• We miss the comprehensive approach (NCCP)
• We forget to consider the patient as a respectful
« normal » person
• We always blame the doctors but they work
within the health care system as build in their
country
• We are still dealing with what is GOOD as we re
not aware of all the factors responsible for
GOOD outcome
• we still miss very important information on
cancer care indicators
Growth of cancer
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
Histologie