Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A comparison of costs and benefits of membership in the EMU Presentation: Jan Pavec, Martina Sedláčková Article: Furceri, Davide, Carras, Georgios: Are the new EU members ready for the EURO? A comparison of costs and benefits. Journal of Policy Modeling 28 (2006), 25–38. Outline Introduction The Convergence criteria Monetary union vs. Independent monetary policy Methodology Results and conclusions of the paper Crisis Introduction 5 of 13 New Member States have already entered the eurozone The question of its costs and benefits becomes actual again in Czech Republic Should we accept the common currency? The convergence criteria Inflation rate must not be higher than 1.5% of the unweighted arithmetic average of the tree Member States with the lowest inflation The ratio of the annual deficit relative to the GDP must not exceed 3% at the end of the preceding fiscal year Government debt-to-GDP ratio must not exceed the 60% country shall keep its monetary exchange-rate within a ±15% range from an unchanged central rate Long-term interest rates Monetary union versus independent monetary policy The more synchronized the business cycles are the lower probability of assymetric shocks, the less negative impact of loss of independent monetary policy The assymetric shocks have an impact on all countries inside the Monetary union Monetary union versus independent monetary policy The higher correlation of business cycles among the members of EMU is, the easier are the actions of ECB in case of shocks, as the impacts on the Eurozone members will be similar Independent monetary policy would be useful for the countries with lower correlation Methodology based on New Keynesianism Three methods of measuring the business cycles were using annual data on the CPI and real GDP to estimate various costs and benefits for 30 European Countries All the results were similar Results The higher is an output volatility after the joining the Monetary Union, the higher are the costs for the entering country Membership of the Monetary union has also a stabilization costs, more uncorrelated the higher the costs are, but it has a declining tendency because of the integrated market Interestingly, there is not a big difference in correlation between the old EMU Member states and the other old EU Member States (the UK, Denmark) Results If the country´s equilibrium of inflation rate is higher than that of the EMU it is more beneficial for the COuntry but these benefits are reduced over time as the new member states decline their inflation Their positions become similar to those of the old Member States higher benefits for Turkey or Romania Results Results Countries for which the benefits and high price-stability benefits are the highest, their costs for joining the Monetary Union are high as well The countries for which the costs of joining the Monetary Union are low they will have a low benefits as well The case of Czech Republic Inflation The case of Czech Republic GDP Discussion Do you think that Czech Republic is ready for a common currency? Is it prepared to accept the Euro? What can be another positive and negative aspects of membership in the Monetary union? References Furceri, Davide, Carras, Georgios. „Are the new EU members ready for the EURO? A comparison of costs and benefits“. Journal of Policy Modeling 28 (2006), 25–38. Schmid, Peter, A. „The crisis of European Monetary Union“. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields 3 (2012), 112-123. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=4bbf6603-e154414c-aac1-8306b35c5e41%40sessionmgr4003&vid=1&hid=4112 (07/03/2014) ART. 140, Treaty of European union, 1992. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:11992M/TXT:EN:HTML (09/03/2014) Tradingeconomics.com. (10/03/2014) Appendix: Crisis situation Appendix: Crisis situation „Common currency is not the reason for the economic imbalances and loss of competitiveness in Southern and peripheral countries“ the EMU is in deep economic crisis but that there is no currency crisis although the common currency might have been favorable to the economic imbalances within the Eurozone The ECB has had its own instruments, but they cannot go forever THE EU must implement strict rules associated with fiscal aid and closer political union