Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Real Estate 2009 America’s Lost Decade of Growth: What Happened and Where Do We Go From Here NABE RE/Construction Teleconference December 3, 2009 Presented By Douglas M. Poutasse Executive Director NCREIF [email protected] 1 Real Estate 2007: “Any Landing You Walk Away From Is A Good Landing” 10/2/2006 Real Estate 2008: Risk is B A C K! 3 The Lost Decade of Growth 10 Year Job Growth 50% Decad e Job Growth (millions ) % Change 1940s 11.927 38% 1950s 10.744 25% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 1960s 16.902 31% 1970s 19.624 28% 10% 1980s 18.351 20% 5% 1990s 21.630 20% 0% 2000s 0.200 0% Source: Moody’s Economy.com: Feb 2009 Forecast 4 Jan-12 Jan-09 Jan-06 Jan-03 Jan-00 Jan-97 Jan-94 Jan-91 Jan-88 Jan-85 Jan-82 Jan-79 Jan-76 Jan-73 Jan-70 Jan-67 Jan-64 Jan-61 Jan-58 Jan-55 Jan-52 Jan-49 15% The Lost Decade of Growth by State State Total Employment 10 Year Growth Rates (January to January) 120% 110% Massachusetts 100% California Florida 90% Arizona 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1993 1991 1989 1987 1985 1983 1981 1979 1977 1975 1973 1971 1969 1967 1965 1963 1961 1959 1957 1955 1953 1951 1949 -10% Source: BLS 5 The Lost Decade of Growth by State State Total Employment 10 Year Growth Rates (January to January) 120% 110% Massachusetts 100% 90% California Florida Arizona 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 19 49 19 51 19 53 19 55 19 57 19 59 19 61 19 63 19 65 19 67 19 69 19 71 19 73 19 75 19 77 19 79 19 81 19 83 19 85 19 87 19 89 19 91 19 93 19 95 19 97 19 99 20 01 20 03 20 05 20 07 20 09 -10% Source: BLS,NCREIF Projection 6 VACANCIES ARE NEARING A PEAK PPR54 VACANCY RATES 25% Forecast 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 Source : PPR Apartment Office Retail Warehouse page 7 What to Expect for NOI Growth The economy is worse in this cycle and the property markets will be weaker Must assume that NOI declines will be greater 8 PEAK-TO-TROUGH DECLINE IN PROPERTY NOI EARLY 1990s EARLY 2000s To 2009Q3 APARTMENTS (10%) (13%) (3%) INDUSTRIAL (11%) (14%) (10%) OFFICE (20%) (16%) (4%) RETAIL (5%) (3%) (9%) TOTAL (12%) (12%) (4%) AEW Real Estate Market Outlook NCREIF Property Index Total Return (4 Quarter Rolling) 9 NCREIF Property Index Cap Rates (Quarterly) 10 Impact of NOI and Cap Rate Changes on Value CAP RATE INCREASE FROM NCREIF 2008 Q4 LEVEL OF 5.5% (BASIS POINTS) 11 POTENTIAL NOI DECLINE 25 50 75 100 150 200 250 (15%) (19%) (22%) (25%) (28%) (33%) (38%) (42%) (10%) (14%) (18%) (21%) (24%) (29%) (34%) (38%) (5%) (9%) (13%) (16%) (20%) (25%) (30%) (35%) (0%) (4%) (8%) (12%) (15%) (21%) (27%) (31%) AEW Real Estate Market Outlook Debt Drives Real Estate Pricing Capital flows drive pricing FOUR QUARTER MOVING AVERAGE OF DEBT FLOWS AND CAP RATES Availability more important than cost More debt = lower yields $400 10.0% $350 9.5% $300 9.0% $250 8.5% $200 8.0% $150 7.5% $100 7.0% $50 6.5% $0 6.0% -$50 5.5% -$100 5.0% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 As of 2008Q4 Source: Federal Reserve, NCREIF 12 AEW Real Estate Market Outlook Excessive Leverage in the Commercial Mortgage Market Commercial & Multifamily Mortgages Outstanding as % of GDP % of GDP 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Sources: Federal Reserve; Moody's Economy.com PPR 13 The Effect of Leverage on Real Estate Investment Performance Equity: $865.3 21.7% Debt: $3,120.6 78.3% NCREIF / Townsend Fund Indices 14 NCREIF/Townsend Fund Indices: Rolling 4 Quarter Performance 15 NCREIF/Townsend Fund Indices: Comparative Performance Gross Returns thru 2009Q2 Core OpenEnd Value Add Closed-End Opportunistic Closed End One Year Return -30.4% -34.4% -50.3% Five Year Return 4.4% 6.1% 8.4% Five Year Std Dev 11.21% 14.52% 22.21% Five Year Individual Fund Performance Core Value Add Opportunistic Count 16 38 Top Quartile Break 5.8% 10.2% 22.3% Median 4.4% 4.0% 10.7% Bottom Quartile Break 2.5% -0.2% Dispersion 1.93% 8.63% 89 -1.0% 21.84% 16 Mixing Illiquid and Liquid Investments in a Strategy • The great lesson of the Crash of 2008: LIQUIDITY MATTERS! • Conventional Wisdom: Public Market investments more liquid than private market • Was BBB CMBS more liquid than a whole loan held in portfolio? It depends on what you mean by liquid! • Hard to hold to your strategy when you have to liquidate your REITs to get cash to meet your opportunity fund capital calls! • Lesson to Learn: Mixing strategies with vastly different liquidity profiles must be done very carefully. • Oh, and LIQUIDITY MATTERS 2008Q3-2009Q2 Contributions Core Value Add Opportunistic 2,331 4,661 19,219 Distributions 4,441 ($ Millions) 1,784 621 17