* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Implications of the Transatlantic Trade & Investment
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
ECIPE PRESENTATION » 21.11.2013 Implications of the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership for the Global Trading System Natalia Macyra Trade Policy Analyst, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) 4th ‘Turkey - Europe Forum’, Istanbul 21-22 November 2012 Session: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and Its Effect on International Economic Security and Multidimensional Relations » Multilateral trading system: From GATT to Doha ‣ In 1947, GATT - post-war world governance ‣ Cold War - maintaining security through the development of prosperous and stable economies ‣ Changes in trade policy objective after 1989 ‣ 1990s the technological expansion, new patterns in global production chains and emerging economies in Asia ‣ The increase of WTO members and trade volume covered by agreements in last twenty years ‣ Traditional production patterns replaced by trade in value added ‣ Reduction in tariffs for goods from 20-30% to 4% (1950 - 2006) 2 » Shifting trade priorities ‣ From WTO impasse to bilateral FTAs » Initial worries about ”undermining the multilateral system” now expunged » Bilateral, plurilateral and regional trade agreements being a response to the gridlock in the WTO negotiations » FTAs generally negotiated much more quickly than WTO accession » Yet little economic value in small FTAs (< 0.1% of GDP); failure of India & Mercosur » Refocusing on ’big’ trading partners, plurilaterals or RTAs since 2012 ‣ New trade issues and barriers » From manufacturing tariffs to services and NTBs » Digital economy and regulation of Internet » Increasing attempts of exporting rules to mid-sized third countries » Regulatory harmonisation vs. regulatory co-operation 3 » Previous attempts to create transatlantic agreement failed ‣ 1995—’New Transatlantic Agenda’, Transatlantic Business Dialogue ‣ 1998—New Transatlantic Marketplace ‣ 2007—Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) ‣ Before 2011, only resulted in “open skies” and weak co-operation agreements on IP, innovation, energy and chemicals ‣ The impasse in multilateral negotiation » Bilateral or regional negotiations as ways to gain new market access » Incentive to trade with major trading partner bigger than with smaller economies ‣ Ideological drift between EU/US after 9/11 ‣ The increased growth in emerging economies in Asia 4 » Why TTIP now? ‣ Response to emerging markets and Asia » Relative share of EU and US GDP diminishing » Necessity to coordinate against BRICs » Liberal, free trade order replaced by priority to domestic protection or foreign policy ‣ New era of economic statecraft » The economics back at ‘the heart of foreign policy‘ » Trade expansion as a core objective for Obama second term » Strong links to trade in the EU ‘Jobs and Growth’ policy ‣ An answer to economic and political needs » Serving only political purposes results in a weaker commitments » A reaction to the potential economic loss » ‘Lock-in mechanism ‘ of trade agreements as an anchor for domestic trade and related policy reform 5 » Economic impact of transatlantic agreement ‣ Global income increase by almost US$130 billion annually ‣ 5% of NTB reduction between the US and EU = 1% NTB reduction for the 3rd country ‣ Improvements in market access for third countries Deep liberalization increases real income of 3,27% ‣ Tariff-only reduction results in growth of 0,1% ‣ Economic impact on partner countries: Changes in per capita income Tariff-only scenario: 6 NTB scenario: China -0,2% China -0,4% India -2,5% India -1,7% Mexico -1,1% Mexico -7,2% Canada -0,7% Canada -9,5% Turkey – 0,3% Turkey -2,5% Brazil +0,5% Brazil +2,5% » Multidimensional implications of TTIP ‣ Bringing comprehensive liberalization in transatlantic trade » Mutual interest in trade openness in both countries » Similarities in values, culture, size and structure of the economy » Possibility to improve the economic situation and recovery from the crisis ‣ Complex impact on the world trading system » Strengthening the existing rules » Establishing a set of regulation in a new areas » An anchor for trade and related policy reforms ‣ New areas for trade liberalization » Non-tariff barriers, investments, government procurement, IPR » Regulatory cooperation and standard harmonization, energy and environmental standards » Internet and digital economy ‣ The ‘gold standard’ for deep and comprehensive global trade and investment integrations » Only in case of comprehensive agreement going behind tariff liberalization 7