Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
THE CHANGING DYNAMICS OF NORTH AMERICAN FEDERALISM AND THE CANADA-U.S. ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP Earl H. Fry Prof. of Political Science and Endowed Prof. of Canadian Studies Brigham Young University September 2010 CHALLENGES FACING LARGEST BILATERAL ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP IN WORLD Trade—33% drop in value of Canadian exports to U.S. in 2009, valued in U.S. dollars Direct Investment—Canadian FDI in U.S. is only slightly smaller that U.S. FDI in Canada, using historical-cost basis Tourism—U.S. trips to Canada recently fell to 1972 levels, even though U.S. population up 100 million since 1972 Currency fluctuations—2002 and 2007 INTERNATIONAL EVENTS ARE TRANSFORMING LIFE IN NORTH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL SECTOR weapons proliferation conflict sports and entertainment economics cyberspace terrorism immigration energy religion and ideology environment culture resources crime disease NORTH AMERICAN CITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER IN 2008, THE UNITED STATES EXPORTED MORE GOODS TO THE EU ($275 BILLION) THAN TO CANADA ($261 BILLION) 34 MILLION PEOPLE VS. 500 MILLION PEOPLE FEDERALISM—STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES State and local governments in U.S. account for $2 trillion in expenditures and 30 million direct and indirect jobs Protectionist concerns—Buy American, ban on outsourcing some state services, softwood lumber, etc. Often much fury and little action—key role played by condition of economy and imminent elections U.S. STATES ARE STILL PROMINENT ECONOMIC ACTORS 2008—1 among top 10 nation-states in world, measured by GDP 11 among top 25 26 among top 50 45 among top 75 50 among top 86 8 of 10 principal trading partners of Canada U.S. states; 9 of 10 provinces trade more with U.S. than each other NAFTA brings together the world’s 1st, 11th, and 13th largest economies (2008) and 3rd, 11th, and 36th most populous nations—it is the LARGEST FTA in the world San Marino Cape Verde Guinea Kenya Hong Kong Argentina Luxembourg Denmark Croatia Moldova Turkey Latvia If Canadian Provinces and Territories were Nation-States, Year 2007 Guatemala ONTARIO IS THE FOURTH LARGEST TRADING PARTNER OF THE UNITED STATES AFTER CANADA, CHINA, AND MEXICO— ONTARIO-U.S. TRADE ALMOST C$830 MILLION PER DAY IN 2008 (BUT WAS C$900 MILLION IN 2004) Provincial Merchandise Exports to the U.S., 2008 Newfoundland and Labrador 75% Prince Edward Island 64% Nova Scotia 78% New Brunswick 82% Quebec 72% Ontario 83% Manitoba 69% Saskatchewan 63% Alberta 87% British Columbia 53% Source: Statistics Canada, 2009. INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 41 states with 224 foreign offices in 30 countries, up from 4 in 1980 but down from 243 in 2002 Roughly 1,000 state employees work in international sector Half of governors lead international trade missions every year Almost all states have international trade and investment divisions About $200 million being spent annually on international programs, exclusive of investment incentives Overall spending is still quite modest—Quebec comparison; Alberta has very active Hidden wire linkages between state and provincial govts CANADA-U.S. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION 5,500 mile common border, with roughly 200 million 2-way border crossings each year. 121 road access routes funneled into 77 ports-of-entry (86% auto traffic through 17 POEs) 20% of total U.S. exports of goods to Canada in 2008 (and 12% to Mexico) 16% of total U.S. imports from Canada U.S. and Canada largest bilateral trading relationship in world (in 2007 China surpassed Canada as #1 exporter to U.S.) About $1.5 billion in daily 2-way trade in goods U.S. exports almost 4 times more to Canada than to Japan and China In 2009, 35 of lower 48 states had Canada as their principal export market, and for all the rest, except NM, Fla, and La, Canada #2 $260 billion in U.S. FDI in Canada 2009 and provided 1.1 million Canadian jobs in 2008 CANADA-U.S. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (Cont.) Canadian FDI in U.S. $226 billion in 2009 and provided 543,000 U.S. jobs in 2007 Affiliates of U.S. companies accounted for 9% of Canada’s GDP and 8% of privatesector jobs in 2006 Roughly a third of U.S. merchandise trade with Canada is intrafirm—role of MNCs and supply chains Canada #1 source of foreign tourists for U.S., and U.S. #1 source of foreign tourists for Canada Canada #1 energy supplier to the U.S.—Alberta’s key role—1.5 million barrels a day of oil to U.S., of which 1.0 million from the oil sands (1) Rise of competitor nations and groups of nations (2) Ability to cope with combination of globalization, unprecedented technology change, and creative destruction (3) 15 major “fault lines” within U.S., ranging from dysfunctional decision-making on Capitol Hill to K-12 education flaws to Wall Street’s debacle (4) Implications for Canada-U.S. economic relations THE UNITED STATES AT MID-CENTURY Almost 440 million people with over 80% of growth attributable to immigration Perhaps a “majority minority” country by 2042 85% or more will be urbanized, with most growth concentrated in largely self-contained suburbs U.S. will remain a military superpower In many other dimensions, U.S. will be a declining superpower in relative terms What will be the quality of life for the average American? How steep will be America’s relative decline? PROVINCIAL GOVT ECONOMIC STRATEGIES Maintain strong economic ties with U.S., the world’s largest domestic economy, and work to thin the “thick border” and end “Buy American” provisions Prioritize in terms of geographical and sectoral targets within the United States—state and municipal linkages Diversify the domestic economy—still very commodity dependent Foster a national economic union—economy-of-scale benefits Promote brain power and smart immigration, including from the U.S. Dynamic federalism and internal development—Alberta key energy partner of U.S. Expect a roller-coaster ride in the North American economic arena over next several years—cyclical vs. structural challenges