Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Welcome to class of Misleading Marketing in Emerging Markets Dr. Satyendra Singh University of Winnipeg Canada www.uwinnipeg.ca/~ssingh5 Negligent Consumer Behaviour Misleading Marketing Negligent Consumer Behavior • This behavior may negatively affect the longterm quality of life of individuals and society • This behavior can occur in 2 contexts – Product misuse – Consumption of hazardous products Product Misuse • Injuries result from misuse of a safe product not from product defects • Using cell phone while driving outlaw • So, the most dangerous component is the consumer no way to recall them Consumption of Hazardous Products • USA, 1988-1998, alcohol related accidents ↓ by ↑ consumer awareness – – – – Informing and education Social controls Economic incentives Economic disincentives • In EM, trend is unknown appears ↑ Misleading Marketing • Telemarketing fraud – Elderly are vulnerable to fraud by telemarketers • Advertising to children – Criticism of advertising directed at children – Ban advertising to children under 12 • Deceptive advertising – Verification of claims – Particularly important in EM Characteristics of Consumers in EM • ↓ Literacy • ↓ Education – Neither compulsory nor readily available • • • • • • ↓ Access to legal remedies BBB Unaware of legal rights Rural communities ↓ Freedom of expression ↓ Access to media Therefore need for control Economics of Information Model to judge veracity of claims Economics of Information Model… • Search claim – Brand X margarine comes in a convenient plastic tub – This claim can be evaluated before the purchase – If learned, distrust advertiser in future advertisements – Advertiser has ↑ incentive to avoid false search claims – Thus little concern to us Economics of Information Model… • Experience claim – Brand X margarine tastes just like butter – Can only be discovered through use of the product – 1st time might be deceived no same mistake twice – Advertisers depend on repeat purchase to recover – investments on their advertisements little concern to us # Economics of Information Model… • Credence claim – Brand X margarine contains 0 % cholesterol – Cannot check the claim even after use of the product – Requires chemical testing – Average customer does not have this resource – Customer must consult other source of information • e.g., magazine to discover if the claim is false – Major concern to us! Economics of Information Model • Take another example Brand Y tastes best – Extremely difficult to verify the claim cannot find all brands so you’d think consumers would not place credence on such advertising But they do because, repeat sales justify credence (and cost of advertising) product must be performing satisfactory So there must be some truth in the claim depends on interpretation Interpret these advertisements... Interpret these advertisements Interpret these advertisements Claim Interpretation Issue • Literal claim – Direct most of us agree on its interpretation • Implied claim different interpretation to different people – Brand X is the only margarine with 0% cholesterol – Brand X is a suitable food for those concerned about heart disease – Brand X is better than butter for those concerned about heart disease Claim Interpretation Issue • TV 30-second advt. addresses large audience • Do not know who will interpret how to be misled • n-% issue what proportion of the audience must draw a false inference before the advertisement may be defined as misleading. n for USA = 15-25%, n for EM = ? • To test claim, 2 criteria: Credibility and Verifiability Schechter’s Approach to Evaluating Claims • Credibility: Prominence of advertiser ↑ if ad appeared on network TV, magazine of ↑ circulation • Verifiability: ↑ Could be evaluated within a month of purchase Verifiability HI Misleading, if n > 50% Misleading, if n > 25% standard Misleading if n > 25% standard Misleading, if n > 5% LO LO Credibility HI Seriousness of injury for being misled: medicine vs. chocolate Seriousness of injury for being misled