Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference Distributed Generation System Impact Analysis with Computer Modeling Tools Sean A. Kufel, P.E. Power System Engineering, Inc. www.powersystem.org April 20, 2015 Session Summary Goal: Developing a reliable, efficient process for performing DG system impact studies. • Data Requirements • Modeling Generation – Types of generator models & adding generation – Types of analysis – Common modeling errors • Focus on steps where errors or confusion are common • NOT: Instructions on using any modeling program • DISCLAIMER(S): I am not a programmer. I am not endorsing any particular modeling application. © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 2 System Impact Analysis Goals Common impacts of DG that can be identified with computer modeling: • Voltage rise • Conductor/equipment overload • Inadequate device interrupt rating • Reverse power flow • Potential for islanding © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 3 Data Requirements • Utility side: – Electrical model of distribution system area where DG is proposed, including: • Source impedance, including substation power transformer • System conductors • Major system equipment – transformers, regulators, capacitors & protective devices • Substation area/feeder peak demand – Historical minimum load in area/on feeder • Often estimated at around 25% of peak if historical hourly data is not available – Protective device settings – Regulator/LTC settings © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 4 Data Requirements • Applicant/Developer/Generation side: – Number of generators to be installed and total aggregate capacity – Proposed facility one-line/three-line diagram – Expected peak generator output & how the generation will be used (back-up only, intermittent operation, on-site load service, power export, etc.) – Location of proposed interconnection (preferably in reference to distribution system) © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 5 Data Requirements • Applicant/Developer/Generation side: – Generator data: • Operating voltage • Ratings: kW, kVA, power factor • Fault information – Steady-state, transient & subtransient reactance values or generator equivalent circuit for rotating machines – For PV with inverter(s), fault current is typically a multiple of rated output (150% is often used) – Other equipment data: • Inverter ratings, solar panel data for PV installations • Ratings & impedances of any generator step-up transformer units (GSU) © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 6 Generator Fault Information Impedance Data © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. Equivalent Circuit 7 Modeling Programs Milsoft WindMil® Eaton CYME • SynerGEE, eTap, Dapper, etc. © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 8 Types of Generator Models • Generic Generator • Two operating modes: – Negative load (constant kW output) – Swing kVAR (hold desired voltage by adjusting kVAR output) • Fault output based on generator impedances © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 9 Types of Generator Models • Specific Generators • Common types: – Synchronous & Induction – Wind turbine – Solar array – Others • Operating modes & fault contributions dependent upon type of generation • Mostly the same as generic for synchronous machines © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 10 Generic Generator Pros/Cons • Con: – Sometimes need to perform impedance calculations when only fault duty is available • Pro: – Conversion utilities are often built in © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 11 Specific Generator Pros/Cons Pro: • Possible to create extremely detailed generator models with LOTS of specific data Con: • Hyper-specific data generally not needed for snapshot analysis • Possible (?) to run highly specific analysis depending upon program modules & capabilities • Lots of specific data can be overwhelming © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 12 Information Overload? © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 13 Add Generation to the Model © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 14 Voltage Drop/Load Flow Analysis Peak Load © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. Minimum Load 15 Voltage Drop/Load Flow Analysis Common Error: Generators not included in analysis © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 16 Collecting Results • From on-screen result boxes: © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 17 Collecting Results • Via custom reports: © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 18 Voltage Drop/Load Flow Analysis • Other things to check: – Substation/source power factor, before & after generation is added – Native loads in all protective zones upline of the generation (with generation offline) • Aid in determining if islanding is possible – Current flow through equipment with generation online – Reverse power flow through equipment and/or substations when generation is operating (more likely and higher at minimum load) © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 19 Checking Protective Zone Loads © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 20 Turning on Power Flow Arrows (If Available) © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 21 Short-Circuit Analysis © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 22 Short-Circuit Analysis: General Gen Z: Steady-state or “None” © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. Gen Z: Subtransient 23 Coordination Analysis © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 24 Device-Device Coordination Setup CYME TCC Settings © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. Device Coordination Check 25 Short-Circuit Analysis: Fault Flow Generator © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. End of Protective Zone 1 Feeder Recloser 26 Short-Circuit: Reverse Fault Flow Initiate fault immediately upline of protective device © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 27 Short-Circuit: Fault Flow • Locations to check during fault flow: – End of protective device zones • Especially in direct path between generation and source • Especially for electronically-controlled reclosers – Check ground pickup setting versus minimum fault flowing through device with generation contributing – Source side of devices in direct path between generation and source – Other feeders on substation © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 28 System Impact Study Model Use Keys • Develop a process and stick to it • Double-check entered data • Document analysis results clearly • Keep track of model changes made to improve system conditions – Probably not a good idea to alter the working model of your existing system if you are a utility, especially if it is an enterprise or shared model • Step back and sanity-check results © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 29 QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 30 Thank You: IEEE 2015 REPC Attendees! Power System Engineering, Inc. Name: Sean A. Kufel, P.E. Title: Electrical Engineer Direct: (740) 568-9220 x11 Mobile: (216) 544-8614 Email: [email protected] www.powersystem.org © 2015 Power System Engineering, Inc. 31