Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Impact of a SuperGrid on the Existing Grid Fernando L. Alvarado The University of Wisconsin Workshop on a National SuperGrid November 8, 2002 Palo Alto, California Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 1 PSERC Jeff Dagle, PNNL Historical Basis for Transmission Renewable resources remote from load Hydroelectricity Thermal generation economies of scale Reduced transportation (“coal by wire”) Reliability (pooling of resources) Interregional exchanges (seasonal, daily) The key questions What is a SuperGrid? How much transmission do we need? Why a “Super” Grid? Can’t “conventional” grid expansion be made to work? Won’t distributed generation do the job? Won’t proper price signals to generators do the job? How much will the SuperGrid cost? Who will pay for it and how? What will be the impact on markets? What technical problems will it solve/create? Will it solve the wrong problem? Will it create new problems? What is a SuperGrid? A high capacity transmission network “overlay” over the existing grid Interface to HV only / at the substation / to the home using new technology Superconducting HVDC, MVDC (50 kV range), or LVDC cables, or AC cables (DC lines and cables with new converters) (Compact overhead line designs) (Low capacitance AC cables) and grid-arranged for reliability reasons Flow control issues with DC grids! Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 4 PSERC The “ideal” SuperGrid would never congest. would be invisible. would be lossless. would cost nothing. would solve all problems and would create no new problems. Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 5 PSERC In other words it would be… an Interstate Highway system for electricity suitable for Interstate commerce Pros of the I-system: • Faster transportation by car and truck • Increased commerce by truck • Increased safety Cons of the I-system: • It was expensive to build • It created new types of insidious congestion • It precluded alternative solutions (e.g., trains) • It increased “dependency on oil” and pollution? • It encouraged urban sprawl • It affected neighborhoods, farms, towns Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 6 PSERC How would the SuperGrid differ from the Interstate Highway system? Electricity is fungible It can be produced locally It does not have to be transported Goods and people are not as fungible When you use the highways to transport a grandmother, you must deliver the same grandmother at the other end (Shmuelism) The SuperGrid is only for electricity Highways carry food, people, goods, etc. The Internet carries voice, pictures, data, etc. Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 7 PSERC How much transmission is needed? This is the wrong question! How much transmission makes sense? This is the right question! Can generation replace transmission? Distributed generation will reduce the need Deregulation and proper price signals help Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 10 PSERC Why is “need” a bad question? Need assumes no response to price Nothing is insensitive to price Other bad questions: How much energy do we need? How much reliability do we need? How many cars do we need? How much health care do we need? Sure there are minimums to all the above to be able to sustain an adequate human level of comfort, but we must either ask about price or restrict the supply. Benefit Justifying transmission Cost/benefit Cost Low cost High benefit Some risk Medium cost Medium benefit Low risk High cost Negative benefit Medium risk Project size There is also uncertainty in cost Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 12 PSERC The distribution of benefits Not everyone benefits equally Not everyone benefits! Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 13 PSERC Total Benefit Distribution of benefits Individual Benefit Cost/benefit Cost Three parties benefit One party loses Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 14 PSERC Do Travelocity and Orbitz serve a useful purpose? Specifics of benefits For consumers on fixed rates Benefit means a lower (sustainable) tariff for a given level of consumption* This is not an optimal way to assess benefit For consumers on real time prices Benefit means total integrated surplus* For producers Benefit means an increase in surplus* Benefit means incentives for expansion For traders ensuring liquidity and efficiency Benefit means a sufficient profit to stay in business (*) Depends on location Price Locational price duration curve And there is a lot of uncertainty about both prices and durations! Fixed tariff customers see a benefit only if the average price is lower Average price Time at price level Price Impact on consumer surplus Highest valued energy Consumer surplus Low valued energy use during high price period will disappear and improve surplus if price signal is given Lower valued energy Time at price level AND percent of low vs. high valued energy Is a locationally uniform price the objective of a SuperGrid? Should electricity cost the same everywhere? Should gas prices be the same everywhere? Should real estate cost the same everywhere? Should all airline tickets cost the same? I don’t think so Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 18 PSERC Can generation replace transmission? In many cases, yes! Reliability may increase Voltage regulation may improve Competition may increase Transmission siting problems may diminish Spatial price differences are essential A completely uniform price at all times: will ensure a bad spatial distribution of supply is a signal that we have overbuilt Eliminating all congestion would be a very expensive policy Presumed pros of a SuperGrid Enable national-level competition Eliminate or greatly reduce market power Eliminate transmission bottlenecks Reduce the impact of bottlenecks is better Increase system reliability Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 20 PSERC Alleged cons of the SuperGrid The costs will be socialized There will be large cross-subsidies It will distort markets It will create new problems And will fail to solve many current problems It will not generate more power It will reduce reliability Do we want the government running the power grid? Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 21 PSERC Why a SuperGrid? We have to do something! Transmission is not being built The government must help There are economies of scale and lumpiness Markets don’t work well in these cases There is the tragedy of the commons Some spend, all benefit There are the jurisdiction issues NIMBY syndrome There are market power issues A SuperGrid would eliminate market power (maybe) Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 22 PSERC Grid utilization trend in New York Year 1999 1998 1997 1996 Central East Total East Flow>75% % of time within Flow>75% % of time within of the time 200MW of limit of the time 200MW of limit 1697MW 26% 3375MW 1% 1549MW 35% 3493MW 3% 2285MW 85% 4800MW 7% 2365MW 90% 4800MW 2% Transmission use appears to be on the decline However, not always so in other cases More “intra-regional” problems surfacing The supergrid will not address inter-regional issues Load pockets, load pockets, load pockets “Grid utilization” is a bad metric! Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 23 PSERC The persisting need for transmission The historical basis for transmission need remains intact: Sustainable resources remote from load (Some) generation economies of scale Reduced transportation (“coal by wire”) Reliability (pooling of resources) Interregional exchanges (seasonal, daily) Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 24 PSERC Our sustainable resources Technology Nuclear Coal Hydro Photovoltaic Wind Biomass Geothermal Gas turbines/Fuel cells Issues and concerns Spent fuel, safety Emissions Environmental impact Cost, intermittency Low density Very low density Limited sites Needs hydrogen source Transmission needs by technology Technology Economies Remoteness Nuclear Scale Coal Scale Hydro Custom Photovoltaic Production Wind Production Biomass Custom Geothermal Custom Fuel cells Production Yes Yes Yes It depends Yes Yes Yes No Fuel transport Inexpensive Expensive Impossible Impossible Impossible Expensive Impossible Pipelines Reliability Maintenance Maintenance Water Insolation Wind Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance Interregion Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Jeff Dagle DER DER can offset local adequacy constraints Grid security can be enhanced through proper design and operation of DER Safety considerations properly addressed Localized voltage support, stability enhancement Planning takes on a whole new dimension Grid utilization factors may decrease Deregulation & markets Deregulation changes grid utilization Congestion pricing limits peak flows Flow control (PAR, FACTS, DC) increase use Inter-regional price differences are the result of grid congestion (and losses) Nodal pricing makes results unintuitive but efficient Reliability has become a concern Regulatory and governmental stability essential to foster investment “Tragedy of the commons” issues Impact on the current grid It will depend on specific features and SuperGrid technology details Are flow controls possible/easy? What is the consequence of a fault? What is the effect of a component failure? How likely is a component failure? Can failures cascade? Will it allow us to “split the grid”? Replace (yes, replace) many HVAC lines with new technology superconducting high capacity lines and split the system into separate AC islands? Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 32 PSERC Likely Supergrid Features Large capacity True grid (vs. point to point) but with few large interconnection points Limited redundancy due to high cost Underground – failures could persist for extended periods Less likely to congest, but Did Interstate roads eliminate congestion? Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 33 PSERC SuperGrid “Limitations” Each connection point equivalent to a large power plant or a large load “Load pockets” are complex, nested and interacting The SuperGrid is unlikely to resolve all load pocket issues DER can help with load pockets Targeted projects can also help (Neptune?) Proper price signals help with load pockets! Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 34 PSERC Other current-grid issues Impact on short-circuit duties and stability must be considered Common-mode failure possibilities must be considered Since electricity prices are not the primary determinant of (most) personal and business activities, the possible impact of shifting patterns must be considered Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 35 PSERC Additional technical issues What will it really look like, in detail? Inter-regional island connectivity only? Will it be an overlay or a replacement? Will it be used for high capacity lines only? Will it be used all the way to substations? Will it be used all the way to customers? How do we design the “connection points” for the SuperGrid? Inverters/rectifiers into a synchronous grid? Converters into radial parts of the system? Are connection points bidirectional by design? Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 36 PSERC Additional concerns “Big brother” issues It will produce no new MWs Congestion will just move around It will not solve the load pocket problem Will it increase or lower reliability? And the most important question of all: who pays for it and how Fernando L. Alvarado Palo Alto, November 7, 2002 37 PSERC Conclusions Traditional reasons for a grid still here Pooling resources, interregional exchanges, etc. Central generation (coal, nuclear) and renewable (hydro) key to the supply portfolio beyond 2020 SuperGrid economic justification is essential Goldplating will result in inter-regional subsidies Subsidies lead to inefficiencies The design details are important and need study Load pockets and other problems will persist Economic signals needed to deal with them