Download View Conference Presentation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Regulatory
Developments
and Impacts
Involving Electricity
Storage in Texas
Elizabeth Drews
31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference
Austin TX, November 4-7, 2012
1
The usual disclaimers
• This is not legal advice or
legal services
• This is no one’s opinion but
mine, & might not stay mine
• This is a summary
• Laws & facts change
2
Why storage could especially benefit ERCOT
ERCOT’s
• Electrical isolation from other
grids
• > 11,000 MW wind (# 1 in US,
# 6 in world, > 2,000 MW
coastal) 12,277 MW by 2014
• Growing demand
• Potential capacity shortfalls
• Nodal market design
3
Where would storage fit in ERCOT?
Capacity, Demand, Reserves Report (May 2012)
4
Generation under study in ERCOT *
Peak demand
68,379 MW
Wind record
8,368 MW
(17.64% of
47,452 MW
load) of which
7,381 noncoastal
Fuel type
Gas
Cancelled Suspended Active
studies
studies
studies
(MW)
(MW)
(MW)
1,939
Nuclear
2,890
8,317
5,900
Coal
3,635
Wind +
394
1,092
1,560
Solar
236
353
856
50
100
Biomass
Storage
Other
Total
906
700
7,400
1,480
21,747
* No firm commitment to build
+ Calculated at 8.7% of nameplate capacity
16,854
5
Some IPP storage development in Texas
Compressed Air Energy
Storage
Apex: 275 MW
Battery
AES: 40 MW
Chamisa: 270 MW,
expandable to 810 MW
Xtreme/Duke: 36 MW, behind
meter w/ wind
ConocoPhillips: behind
meter w/ wind or solar
Source: filings in Public Utility Commission of Texas
(PUCT) Projects 39764, 39917, 41026
6
Some uses of electricity storage
• Energy time-shift
• Peak shave
• Ancillary services
• Reliable power in outage
• Address voltage, frequency variations
• Transmission support
• ↓ transmission congestion
• Defer T&D upgrades
Adapted from PUCT 2011 Scope of Competition Report
7
Generalized attributes of storage technologies
CAES
Battery
Can inject for hours-days Can inject ≤ hour
Can respond to grid
needs in minutes
Hundreds of MW
Can respond to grid
needs in seconds
Tens of MW, modular
$ hundreds of millions
2 years to build
Must be near
cavern or
similar, TX has
$ 1-10 million
1 year to build
Attributes/capabilities vary
by project & technologies
are evolving
8
Regulatory limits on uses of ERCOT storage
In non-retail choice
areas, utility, coop,
muni can own G&T
• Can own storage
that serves both
functions
In retail choice areas, utility
owns T&D, power generation
company owns generation
• Protects competition
• Keeps storage from
supplying & being paid for all
its uses
9
Storage as transmission
PUCT Docket 35994, ETT
• Transmission/distribution utility owns 4 MW battery
to help voltage & delay transmission in remote area,
does not own or sell energy from the battery
• PUC: transmission asset, can put in rate base
• Operational since 2010
10
Storage as generation
2011 statute (SB 943) – Texas storage:
• Intended to sell energy or ancillary services at
wholesale is generation
• May interconnect, obtain transmission service, sell
electric energy & ancillary services at wholesale
consistent w/ TX law re: power generation company
or EWG
• Must register as power
generation company
11
PUCT pricing rule on storage
(2012, Project 39917) 3 main decisions
• Electricity purchases by storage
for charging are wholesale, not
retail (same as FERC)
• Such electricity purchases are
settled nodally (at bus that
connects the storage facility), not
zonally like a load
• Retail transmission & ancillary
service charges do not apply to
such electricity purchases
12
ERCOT rule changes, integration issues
ERCOT’s Emerging Technologies
Working Group
IDs & proposes changes to ERCOT
requirements that preclude market
participation of emerging technologies
• Has addressed # issues relating to
storage
• Is developing a list of operations issues
relating to storage
13
PUCT ERCOT pilot project rule
(2012, Project 40150)
Allows ERCOT pilot projects for storage/other ET
• ERCOT may temporarily exempt pilot participants
from specific ERCOT requirements
• ERCOT board must approve pilot project; board
decision appealable to PUCT
• Rule leaves many issues, e.g. cost allocation &
post-pilot transition if any, to ERCOT pilot review
process to resolve
14
Pilot projects at ERCOT
• ERCOT posts documents for
each pilot project on its website
• ERCOT has been working on
a pilot project for a Fast
Responding Regulation Service
(similar to FERC Order 755,
“pay for performance”)
15