Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg The Onslaught Increasingly large amounts of information is becoming accessible electronically. The information sources are increasingly complicated. The diversity of types of information source is also increasing. Technologies are emerging to cope with this onslaught: ontology-based computing. Ontologies Shared understanding within a community of people Declarative specification of entities and their relationships with each other Constraints and rules that permit reasoning within the ontology Behavior associated with stated or inferred facts Relational Database Schemas Well established technique for specifying the structure of shared data, not for communication between people or agents Declarative specification but of tables, not of entities and relationships Some constraints are expressible but no significant rules (such as inheritance) No explicit behavior Standard language is SQL. Object-Oriented Schemas Emerging technology for communication between software components Declarative specifications Constraints and some rules Several ways to specify behavior The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is the standard OO modeling language. Pathway name : string 1..1 input consists of 0..* 2..* Reaction 0..* description : string 1..1 1..* output Chemical name : string formula : string weight : number 1..* catalyzed b y 0..1 Enzyme sequence : string Logic Very expressive but very difficult to use. Not designed for communication. Most logical languages are not based on entities and relationships. Very powerful inferencing capabilities. Do not usually have any associated behavior. Many examples: Prolog, KIF, Slang, ... XML DTDs and XML Schema Defines a hierarchical document type. XML Schema defines data types. Designed for communication over the Web. Good support for entities and hierarchical relationships; awkward for others. Constraints can be imposed on the hierarchical structure and on data types. Behavior can be specified procedurally. Knowledge Representations Very well developed branch of AI. Many tools, but mostly academic. Not yet used for communication over the Web. Powerful language for specifying entities and their relationships. Most are linked with inference engines. Behavior is typically handled in an ad hoc manner. RDF and DAML Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a knowledge representation language represented in XML. It is a WWW Consortium Recommendation. The DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML) is an extension of RDF to serve as the basis for ontology-based computing over the Web: the Semantic Web. Ontological Reasoning in RDF Property Class type Wendy type type Person Fish type owns type range type domain owns Wanda Type constraint violation: The range of owns is Fish. OR There is no inconsistency: Wanda is a fish! Mermaid? DAML type type Student College type type domain range majors subClassOf onProperty type Engineering equivalentTo Property Class maxCardinality majors type Arts & Sciences majors George 1 type Restriction Cardinality constraint violation: George can’t have two majors OR There is no inconsistency: Engineering = Arts & Sciences Representing information Relational database: records OO database: objects and links Logic: facts XML: documents Knowledge Representations: annotations All of these are graph structures: entities related to other entities by relationships. Where is the meaning? Databases: select-project-join queries Logic: rules determined by unification XML: XSLT patterns Knowledge Representations: templates All of these are forms of graph matching. The units of meaning are small connected subgraphs that I call motifs. Ontology Infrastructure Simply introducing a language is not enough. There must be an infrastructure to support ontology-based computing, including: Ontology development tools Content creation systems Storage and retrieval systems Ontology reasoning, mediation, ... Integration with applications Ontology Development Ontologies can be developed using graphical tools specifically for ontologies or by adapting existing tools such as CASE tools. Testing ontologies is not easy because they include constraints and inference rules. Ontology testing is analogous to type checking in programming languages. Content Creation Databases: Data warehousing technology Text: Natural Language Processing (NLP) Image processing Direct creation of content No matter how the content is created it must be tested using consistency checking. Storage and Retrieval Scaling up will require high-performance, distributed storage and indexing technology. The natural units for indexing are the motifs (precomputed joins), but the number of motifs is large. Jarg Corporation has developed a scalable, high-performance indexing technology for ontology-based knowledge representations. Jarg Architecture Document NLP Knowledge Representation fragmentation Knowledge Fragments Distributed Index Engine Query NLP Knowledge Motifs fragmentation Knowledge Representation Matching Documents Conclusion Ontology-based computing is emerging as a natural evolution of existing technologies to cope with the information onslaught. Ontology-based technology must be scalable if it is to contribute to the solution rather than add to the problem. Consistency checking is important for the development of ontologies and content. Bibliography Semantic Web: www.w3.org/2001/sw Ontologies: www.ontology.org Unified Modeling Language: www.omg.org/uml Knowledge Interchange Format: logic.stanford.edu/kif Specware and Slang: www.kestrel.edu XML and XML Schema: www.w3.org/xml RDF and RDFS: www.w3.org/rdf DAML: www.daml.org Notation 3: www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html Consistency checking: vis.home.mindspring.com Jarg Knowledge Engine: www.jarg.com