Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
AgBase Shane Burgess, Fiona McCarthy Mississippi State University 1. Who we are • Ontology users: – Experimentalists: model our own functional genomics data sets – Tool developers: develop ontology-based tools for functional modeling – Ontology training: train researchers in the use of ontologybased tools • Ontology developers: – Burgess: involved in development of GO immune function – McCarthy: involved in development of GO viral process terms… – AgBase biocurators: GO & PO new term requests and changes during biocuration • Ontology contributors: – funded to provide GO annotations for chicken, agricultural animals, maize, cotton… – funded to provide PO annotations for maize & cotton… 2. Why we use ontologies? • Structure: ability to organize data • Ability to capture data as information sources grow. • Tools: ability to model high throughput data sets – summarizing function – functional enrichment analysis – hypothesis-testing • Comparative biology: use of ontological data to understand differences between species 3. Ontology Tools we are using at AgBase • None • Ontology contributors: – Initially used excel! – Developed in house biocuration interface for annotation • Ontology developers: – Mostly minor development so we only use online ontology browser tools (e.g., QuickGO, AmiGO) 4. Roadblocks • How to annotate increasing number of sequences from new sequencing technologies? – – – – No literature Short sequences – similarity/motif finding not effective Noncoding RNAs Move to tissue/phenotype ontologies to capture data? • Visualization – How to view functional data from multiple ontologies – Expression data, functional data and genome browser? – How to link gene products to pathways and phenotypes? 5. Vision • Need to employ multiple ontologies to get comprehensive functional modeling – cross-ontology queries – rapidly populating other functional ontologies (where is the “IEA pipeline” equivalent?) – enrichment analysis tools that handle multiple ontologies • Manual biocuration – more effective at targeting manual effort towards “high importance” genes – moving annotation data to new species (pathogens, fungus, plants, marine invertebrates…) 6. Collaborators? • Type of person or resource who could help? • Where are the people driving the need?