Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Overview of Genome Databases Peter D. Karp, Ph.D. SRI International [email protected] www-db.stanford.edu/dbseminar/seminar.html Talk Overview Definition of bioinformatics Motivations Issues for genome databases in building genome databases Definition of Bioinformatics Computational techniques for management and analysis of biological data and knowledge Methods for disseminating, archiving, interpreting, and mining scientific information Computational Genome theories of biology Databases is a subfield of bioinformatics Motivations for Bioinformatics Growth in molecular-biology knowledge (literature) Genomics 1. Study of genomes through DNA sequencing 2. Industrial Biology Example Genomics Datatypes Genome sequences DOE Joint Genome Institute Gene 511M bases in Dec 2001 11.97G bases since Mar 1999 and protein expression data Protein-protein Protein interaction data 3-D structures Genome Databases Experimental data Archive experimental datasets Retrieving past experimental results should be faster than repeating the experiment Capture alternative analyses Lots of data, simpler semantics Computational symbolic theories Complex theories become too large to be grasped by a single mind The database is the theory Biology is very much concerned with qualitative relationships Less data, more complex semantics Bioinformatics Distinct intellectual field at the intersection of CS and molecular biology Distinct field because researchers in the field must know CS, biology, and bioinformatics Spectrum from CS research to biology service Rich source of challenging CS problems Large, noisy, complex data-sets and knowledge-sets Biologists and funding agencies demand working solutions Bioinformatics Research algorithms + data structures = programs algorithms + databases = discoveries Combine sophisticated algorithms with the right content: Properly structured Carefully curated Relevant data fields Proper amount of data Reference on Major Genome Databases Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue http://nar.oupjournals.org/content/vol30/issue1/ 112 databases Questions to Ask of a New Genome Database What are Database Goals and Requirements? What Who problems will database be used to solve? are the users and what is their expertise? What is its Organizing Principle? Different DBs partition the space of genome information in different dimensions Experimental Organism methods (Genbank, PDB) (EcoCyc, Flybase) What is its Level of Interpretation? Laboratory data Primary literature (Genbank) Review (SwissProt, MetaCyc) Does DB model disagreement? What are its Semantics and Content? What How entities and relationships does it model? does its content overlap with similar DBs? How many entities of each type are present? Sparseness of attributes and statistics on attribute values What are Sources of its Data? Potential information sources Laboratory instruments Scientific literature Manual entry Natural-language text mining Direct submission from the scientific community Genbank Modification policy DB staff only Submission of new entries by scientific community Update access by scientific community What DBMS is Employed? None Relational Object oriented Frame knowledge representation system Distribution / User Access Multiple distribution forms enhance access Browsing access with visualization tools API Portability What Validation Approaches are Employed? None Declarative consistency constraints Programmatic Internal What consistency checking vs external consistency checking types of systematic errors might DB contain? Database Documentation Schema and its semantics Format API Data acquisition techniques Validation techniques Size of different classes Coverage of subject matter Sparseness of attributes Error rates Update frequency Relationship of Database Field to Bioinformatics Scientists generally unaware of basic DB principles Complex queries vs click-at-a-time access Data model Defined semantics for DB fields Controlled vocabularies Regular syntax for flatfiles Automated consistency checking Most biologists take one programming class Evolution of typical genome database Finer points of DB research off their radar screen Handfull of DB researchers work in bioinformatics Database Field For many years, the majority of bioinformatics DBs did not employ a DBMS Flatfiles were the rule Scientists want to see the data directly Commercial DBMSs too expensive, too complex DBAs too expensive Most scientists do not understand Differences between BA, MS, PhD in CS CS research vs applications Implications for project planning, funding, bioinformatics research Recommendation Teaching scientists programming is not enough Teaching scientists how to build a DBMS is irrelevant Teach scientists basic aspects of databases and symbolic computing Database requirements analysis Data models, schema design Knowledge representation, ontologies Formal grammars Complex queries Database interoperability BioSPICE Bioinformatics Database Warehouse Peter Karp, Dave Stringer-Calvert, Tom Lee, Kemal Sonmez SRI International http://www.BioSPICE.org/ Project Goal Create a toolkit for constructing bioinformatics database warehouses that collect together a set of bioinformatics databases into one physical DBMS Motivations Important bioinformatics problems require access to multiple bioinformatics databases Hundreds of bioinformatics databases exist Nucleic Acids Research 30(1) 2002 – DB issue Nucleic Acids Research DB list: 350 DBs at http://www3.oup.co.uk/nar/database/a/ Different problems require different sets of databases Motivations Combining multiple databases allows for data verification and complementation Simulation problems require access to data on pathways, enzymes, reactions, genetic regulation Why is the Multidatabase Approach Not Sufficient? Multidatabase query approaches assume databases are in a DBMS Internet bandwidth limits query throughput Most sites that do operate DBMSs do not allow remote SQL access because of security and loading concerns Control data stability Need to capture, integrate and publish locally produced data of different types Multidatabase and Warehouse approaches complementary Scenario 1 BioSPICE scientist wants to model multiple metabolic pathways in a given organism Enumerate pathways and reactions What enzymes catalyze each reaction? What genes code for each enzyme? What control regions regulate each gene? Approach Oracle and MySQL implementations Warehouse schema defines many bioinformatics datatypes Create loaders for public bioinformatics DBs Parse file format for the DB Semantic transformations Insert database into warehouse tables Warehouse query access mechanisms SQL queries via Perl, ODBC, OAA Example: Swiss-Prot DB Version 40.0 describes 101K proteins in a 320MB file Each protein described as one block of records (an entry) in a large text file Loader tool parses file one entry at a time Creates new entries in a set of warehouse tables Warehouse Schema Manages many bioinformatics datatypes simultaneously Pathways, Reactions, Chemicals Proteins, Genes, Replicons Citations, Organisms Links to external databases Each type of warehouse object implemented through one or more relational tables (currently 43) Warehouse Schema Databases on our wish list: Genbank (nucleotide sequences) Protein expression database Protein-protein interactions database Gene expression database NCBI Taxonomy database Gene Ontology CMR Warehouse Schema Manages multiple datasets simultaneously Dataset = Single version of a database Support alternative measurements and viewpoints Version comparison Multiple software tools or experiments that require access to different versions Each dataset is a warehouse entity Every warehouse object is registered in a dataset Warehouse Schema Different databases storing the same biological types are coerced into same warehouse tables Design of most datatypes inspired by multiple databases Representational tricks to decrease schema bloat Single space of primary keys Single set of satellite tables such as for synonyms, citations, comments, etc. Warehouse Schema Examples Protein data from Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL, KEGG, and EcoCyc all loaded into same relational tables Pathway data from MetaCyc and KEGG are loaded into the same relational tables Example: Swiss-Prot DB ID AC DT DT DT DE DE GN 1A11_CUCMA STANDARD; PRT; 493 AA. P23599; 01-NOV-1991 (Rel. 20, Created) 01-NOV-1991 (Rel. 20, Last sequence update) 15-DEC-1998 (Rel. 37, Last annotation update) 1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLATE SYNTHASE CMW33 (EC 4.4.1.14) (ACC SYNTHASE) (S-ADENOSYL-L-METHIONINE METHYLTHIOADENOSINE-LYASE). ACS1 OR ACCW. How Swiss-Prot is Loaded into The Warehouse Register Swiss-Prot in Datasets table Create entry in Entry and Protein tables for each Swiss-Prot protein Satellite tables store Protein synonyms, citations, comments, accession numbers, organism, sequence features, subunits/complexes, DB links Protein Table CREATE TABLE Protein ( WID Name AASequence Charge Fragment MolecularWeightCalc MolecularWeightExp PICalc PIExp DataSetWID ); NUMBER --The warehouse ID of this protein VARCHAR2(500) --Common name of the protein VARCHAR2(4000),--Amino-acid sequence for this prote NUMBER, --Charge of the chemical CHAR(1), --Is this protein a fragment or not, NUMBER, --Molecular weight calculated from s NUMBER, --Molecular Weight determined throug VARCHAR2(50), --pI calculated from its sqeuence. VARCHAR2(50), --pI value determined through experi NUMBER --Reference to the data set from whi Database Loaders Loader tool defined for each DB to be loaded into Warehouse Example loaders available in several languages Loaders KEGG (C) BioCyc collection of 15 pathway DBs (C) Swiss-Prot (Java) ENZYME (Java) Terminology Organism Database (MOD) – DB describing genome and other information about an organism Pathway/Genome Database (PGDB) – MOD that combines information about Pathways, reactions, substrates Enzymes, transporters Genes, replicons Transcription factors, promoters, operons, DNA binding sites Model – Collection of 15 PGDBs at BioCyc.org EcoCyc, AgroCyc, YeastCyc BioCyc Loader Architecture Swiss-Prot Datafile Grammar for Swiss-Prot ANTLR Parser Generator Parser for SwissProt SQL Insert Commands Oracle Loadable File Current Warehouse Contents KEGG ENZYME SwissProt BsubCyc Warehouse Total Chemicals 7,284 2,952 0 576 10,812 Genes 5,714 0 88,605 4,221 98,540 60 0 103,807 1 103,868 Proteins 3,829 3,870 101,602 4,150 113,451 Enzymatic Reactions 3,509 0 0 717 4,226 Pathways 4,517 0 0 138 4,655 Pathway Reactions 36,271 0 0 530 36,801 Organisms Example Warehouse Uses Check completeness of data sources Count reactions in ENZYME database with (and without) associated protein sequences in SWISS-PROT database: 3870 reactions in ENZYME 1662 reactions (43%) with a sequence in SWISS-PROT 2208 reactions (57%) without a sequence in SWISS-PROT Count #of distinct non-partial EC numbers in SWISS-PROT: 1554 distinct EC numbers in SWISS-PROT (non-partial)