Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
500K planet at 1.0, 0.5, 0.3 AU around a G2V Barman et al. (ApJ 556, 885, 2001) Contrast Hot Jupiter vs planet at 5 AU Hot Jupiter contrast to a G2 and M5 Day side (substellar point) Pegasides • Teq ~ 1250 K (Guillot et al. 1996) - Jeans Evaporation without danger for the planet’s survival - No mass transfer (atm < lobe de Roche) • Rotation / revolution synch. : zonal winds > 1 km/s (Showman et Guillot 2002) energy redistribution • Entire convective planet : evolution in 2 phases 1) rapid contraction Teff 2) slow cooling + insulation reduced thermal gradient ( Jupiter) external radiative zone + slowed gravitational contraction R > RJupiter • Spectra : - Visible = reflected (Tbolo Teff) - IR = thermal emission - spectral signatures (Na, K, CO, H2O) - role of clouds (ex. silicates) (Baraffe et al. 2003) Atmospheres and spectra of giant exoplanets • Spectra determined by the chemical composition of the external atmosphere • BUT stars (hot) condensed species that contribute to the opacity: - H20 solid, Fe solid - Enstatite, forsterite, CaTiO3 • Visual (reflected) + IR (thermal emission) • Temperature (distance the star) Classe 1 2 3 4 5 Distance Teq qq u.a. < 150 K 1-2 u.a. 250 K 1 u.a. 350-800K Espèces dominantes CH4, NH3 H2O H20, CH4, Na, K 0.1 u.a. 1000 K 0.05 u.a. 1400 K CO, Na, K, Li, Ru, H20 H20, CO , nuages remarques IR faible bandes de H2O albedo faible absence de nuages Silicates pas visibles cf. après Sudarsky et al., 2003 Gas giant spectra Sudarsky et al., 2003 Comparison to other model atmospheres This compares our Teff=100K, logg=3.0, model irradiated with the same flux as a particular set of models from Hubeny, Sudarsky, Burrows 2003. The difference between the dashed line and solid black lines is the presence (solid) and absence (dashed) of TiO & VO- opacity. Observational Constraints Na I D Observation Monochromatic radius Rp = 1.42 +0.1/-0.13 RJup opacity stronger at Charbonneau et al., 2002 - Weaker neutral Na concentration than expected ? - High altitude clouds (reduces the limb size) - departure from local thermodynamic equilibrium Discussion about HD 209458 b’s radius: Cf. Allard Darwin Conf. 2003 Na I D et HD209458b Barman et al. (ApJ 569, L51, 2002) Left: Monochromatic radius of HD209458b, based upon the Phoenix model atmospheres with Na in LTE (in black) and non-LTE. Right: Transit depth at wavelengths centered around the Na I D doublet, relative to the transit depth in adjacent bands, based upon the models on the left. The points are observations by Charbonneau et al. (2002). Evolutionary Models for cool Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets Baraffe et al. (A&A 402, 701, 2003) Evolutionary Models for cool Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets Baraffe et al. (A&A 402, 701, 2003) Evolutionary Models for cool Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets Baraffe et al. (A&A 402, 701, 2003) Emergent and reflected spectra (Tint=100K) a=0.023AU Teq=2400K a=0.046AU Teq=1700K Compares the SEDs for HD209458b and OGLE-TR56b. Also shows the pure reflected contributions for both. TR56b is closer and hotter to the parent star and, therefore, a larger fraction of the optical spectrum is due entirely to thermal reradiation of absorbed stellar flux. This is not the case for HD. Lyman observation -15% attenuation of Lyman during the transit (1.5% of the surface) - Roche Lobe: R = 3.6 Rjup at 8.5 R* - If the Roche Lobe fills, 10% attenuation of Lyman H2 escape Texosphere Teq (Lammer, Selsis et al.) Vidal-Madjar et al., 2003 Phase Temperature-Pressure (T-P) profile of HD209458b’s atmosphere for several concentric regions (lines of constant incident flux) around the substellar point. The upper curve corresponds to the substellar point. The dotted curves correspond to regions intermédiate to the substellar point and the terminator. The lowermost curve corresponds to the non-light hemisphere. Model atmospheres, thermal profiles, spectra and synthetic photometry of Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Giant Planets (with and without stellar irradiation) are available for all stages of evolution: http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/france.allard Perspectives • Phase spectra, Global Atmospheric Circulation • Thermal Escape, Gravitational Sedimentation, Photochemistry • Sub- jovien and telluric Planet Atmospheres Conclusions