* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Brown Dwarfs and M Dwarfs
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Are magnetically-powered phenomena on brown dwarfs similar to or very different from M dwarfs? Jeffrey L. Linsky JILA/University of Colorado and NIST The EVLA Vision: Stars on and off the Main Sequence Socorro NM 26-28 May 2009 Outline for this “tale of thermonuclear failure and its many consequences” • Low mass “objects” do not have stable thermonuclear reactions to heat their cores and halt the gravitational contraction → rapid rotation and degenerate convective cores → secular cooling of the atmosphere. • Cool atmospheres have very low ionization → decoupling of turbulent flows and magnetic fields until very deep in the atmosphere → photospheric magnetic fields with very little free energy. • Very small Rossby numbers predict saturated activity if brown dwarfs are like M dwarfs, but LX is weak. Why? • Weak coronal heating (due to small convective speeds and near potential magnetic fields) → low density coronae → gyrosynchrotron radio emission (LR~nrelB2E2) but weak X-ray emission (Lx~ne2f(T)). Spectra (not mass) determine star types (Burgasser in Physics Today June 2008) Evolutionary tracks (age and mass) (Burrows et al. ApJ 491,856 (1997)) • Theoretical BD models from Burrows et al. (Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 719 (2001)). • With time: Tc and ρc increase. • Blue: H burning stars (0.075-0.2 Msun). • Green: BDs that burned D and now have electron degenerate cores and cool. • Red: BDs that did not burn D (0.3-13 MJ). • Dots mark ages when 50% of D and Li burned in core. • Cores are convective metallic H/He mixtures The interior structure of a star changes with decreasing mass • Central temperatures (Tc) decrease with lower mass • Central densities (ρc) increase then decrease • Cores degenerate when (ψ=kT/kTF <0.1) • Core fully convective for M<0.35Msun (M3 V) • Uncertainties: EOS, convection in molecular atmosphere, opacities. Solid lines (t=5Gyr), dashed lines (t=108 yr) C • Jupiter: M=0.001Msun (Chabrier & Baraffe ARAA 38, 337 (2000) h a From M dwarfs to brown dwarfs: TC as function of mass and age • Dashed lines indicate temperatures for burning H, Li, & D. • Minimum mass for burning H is 0.075Msun (about M8 but depends on age) Chabrier & Baraffe (2000) Brown dwarf photosphere models • There are nonLTE radiative/convective equilibrium models for M, L, T dwarfs and gas giant planets by Allard, Hauschildt, Tsuji, etc. • Major issues include: completeness of molecular opacities, convection (ML or 3D hydro), dust formation and opacity, initial conditions for young (t<few Myr) BDs. • Photospheres are neutral and the depth where ionization becomes important increases to later spectral type. • With decreasing Teff , the magnetic field and convective motions are uncoupled deeper into the star. This will be important for MHD coronal heating and structure. Very different from the Sun and M dwarfs. • H2 dissociation produces small (dT/dh)ad and low vconv Saturation at small Rossby numbers (Reiners et al. ApJ 692, 538 (2009)) • Rossby number = R0=Prot/τconv • For M dwarfs and hotter stars, saturation of Bf, Lx/Lbol, and LHα/Lbol at R0<0.1 • For R0>0.1, activity indicators depend on rotation (and age). • All seven M3.5-M6 rapid rotators (vsini>5) are in saturation regime. • Saturation behavior for both fully convective stars and stars with radiative cores. All L dwarfs are rapid rotators and in the saturation regime (Reiners & Basri ApJ 684, 1390 (2008)) Rotational evolution of M and BDs: observations and theory (Reiners & Basri (2008)) • • • • Blue = young stars; red = old stars Solid lines: rotation models for stars of mass 0.06 – 0.10 Msun Dashed lines: isochrones for 2, 5, 10 Myr (upper left to lower right) Theory: gravitation contraction and a magnetic-wind breaking law depending on mass and Teff (lower convective speed → decreased coronal heating and lower mass loss and angular momentum loss). Change in properties from M stars to BDs (Berger et al. ApJ 676, 1307 (2008)) Parameter Sp. Type Log(Lx/Lbol) Flares? Log(LHα/Lbol) UV(2600Å)/photo Log(νLR/LX) vsin i (km/s) Mass/Sun H burning core? Early M M0-M6 Up to -3 yes Up to -3.5 Large -15.5 3-5 0.1-0.3 Yes VB 10 M8 -4.1to -5 yes -4.4 10xphot -13.2 6.5 0.08? Yes? LSR1835 M8.5 <-5.7 ? -4.5 to -5 ~photo >-11.3 ~50 0.06? No? Late M-BD stars are in saturation regime (log R0<0.1) but LX/Lbol below hotter stars Violation of the radio vs. X-ray luminosity law of Guedel & Benz (2003) (cf. Berger et al. 2008) Failure of acoustic heating BD atmospheres have very low ionization and high resistivity • Fractional ionization very small except deep in the atmosphere • High diffusion rate means that the magnetic field has lowest energy (potential) and no twist. Magnetic Reynolds number and coupling of B to convective motions • Rm=vLv/ηd~BT/B0 (advection/diffusion) • For Teff<1700 K, photospheric motions completely decoupled from B except deep in photosphere. • Untwisted fields have no free energy and cannot heat a chromosphere or corona by reconnection. • With decreasing Teff, dynamos can operate deeper in the star. A modest proposal for explaining the violation of the radio vs. X-ray luminosity law • BDs have cool neutral atmospheres → magnetic fields have little free energy in the photosphere → low heating rate for the corona. • Coronae are cooler with small pressure scale heights and low densities. Coronal magnetic field reconnections likely occur where density very low. (Extremely low β.) • LX~ne2f(T). More sensitive to density than T. • LR~nrelB2(ε/m0c2)2 (if gyrosynchrotron emission). Electron energy distribution (power law) is critical. • What mechanisms could stress coronal magnetic fields? (1) stellar differential rotation, (2) interactions with magnetic fields or winds of a “roaster”, (3) emergence of new fields from below, etc. Possible scenarios for heating BD chromospheres (Hα, UV) and coronae (X-rays, radio, flares) • Important papers: Mohanty et al. (ApJ 571, 469 (2002)); Meyer & Meyer-Hofmeister (A&A 341, L23 (1999)). • Acoustic wave fluxes (Fac~v8conv) fail to explain Hα emission of L dwarfs by 3-5 orders of magnitude. • Energy not from photospheric turbulent flows twisting the magnetic fields because little coupling to magnetic fields. • Differential rotation could be the energy source for winding the field lines in the corona and eventual dissipation. How are flares possible in BDs? • Intermittent events are possible. • Mohanty et al. (2002) suggest that some emerging twisted flux ropes may be thick enough to emerge through the photosphere without being diffused. • Consider a bootstrap scenario in which emerging twisted flux ropes heat and ionize the surrounding atmosphere and reduce the neutrality. (Perhaps by current dissipation.) • Flares on BDs may have different properties from M dwarfs because the surrounding gas is low density (e.g., strong nonthermal radio emission with little thermal X-ray emission). LHα/Lbol as a function of vsini and spectral type (Reiners & Basri (2008)) • Filled circles: near M9; open circles: M9-L1; filled squares: L1.5-L3; open squares: L3.5 and later. • Late M dwarfs saturated or rotation-activity (at low vsini). • BDs far below M dwarfs at all vsini due to lower heating rates. No rotation-activity as previously found by Mohanty & Basri (2003). Evolution of stellar effective temperatures as function of mass • For M<0.075Msun,Teff decreases with age. • An ambriguity: at a given Teff, there are young low mass stars and old higher mass stars. • As Teff decreases the atmospheres become far less ionized and poor electrical conductors. Chabrier & Baraffe (2000)