* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Complete Contribution
Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup
Computer network wikipedia , lookup
Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup
Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup
Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup
Network tap wikipedia , lookup
Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup
List of wireless community networks by region wikipedia , lookup
Contribution Number: OIF2001.112 Working Group: Title: Architecture, Signaling and Carriers Working Groups Presentation given on OIF2001.067 Proposal to form a Project on Architectures and Signaling for Configurable All-Optical Networks Date: January 22, 2001 Source: Adel A. M. Saleh (Speaker) Yassi Moghaddam Jane M. Simmons Avici Systems Lotfi Benmohamed Corvis Jonathan Lang Calient Networks Angela Chiu Robert W. Tkach Celion Networks Raj Jain Nayna Networks Rauf Izmailov Yoshiharu Maeno Yoshihiko Suemura NEC Subra Ambati Joe Parker Opthos Brian Brown Bala Rajagopalan Richard Lauder Tellium Malin Premaratne Redfern Broadband Networks ABSTRACT: This is a copy of the presentation made at the OIF meeting in Tampa, Florida on 1/31/2001 related to Contribution OIF2001.067 on “Proposal to form a Project on Architectures and Signaling for Configurable All-Optical Networks.” At the meeting, no formal motion was made to form a project. This is currently planned for the next OIF meeting after some fine-tuning. Meanwhile, contributions in this area are solicited. Notice: This contribution has been created to assist the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF). This document is offered to the OIF solely as a basis for discussion and is not a binding proposal on the companies listed as resources above. Each company in the source list, and the OIF, reserves the rights to at any time to add, amend, or withdraw statements contained herein. This Working Text represents work in progress by the OIF, and must not be construed as an official OIF Technical Report. Nothing in this document is in any way binding on the OIF or any of its members. The document is offered as a basis for discussion and communication, both within and without the OIF. For additional information contact: The Optical Internetworking Forum, 39355 California Street, Suite 307, Fremont, CA 94538 510-608-5990 phone ! [email protected] © 1998 Optical Internetworking Forum OIF Contribution 2001.067, January 31, 2001 Proposal to form a “Project” on Architectures and Signaling for Configurable All-Optical Networks Adel A. M. Saleh, (Editor) Corvis with other contributors from Avici, Calient, Celion, Corvis, Nayna, NEC, Opthos, Redfern, Tellium Contributors to OIF2001.067 Proposal Adel A. M. Saleh (Editor) Jane M. Simmons Lotfi Benmohamed Corvis Angela Chiu Robert W. Tkach Yassi Moghaddam Jonathan Lang Avici Systems Calient Networks Raj Jain Rauf Izmailov Yoshiharu Maeno Nayna Networks Celion Networks Yoshihiko Suemura NEC Subra Ambati Joe Parker Opthos Brian Brown Richard Lauder Malin Premaratne Bala Rajagopalan Tellium Redfern Broadband Networks Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 Abstract / Motivation Long-reach optics and configurable all-optical networks provide economic benefits for carriers in terms of both capital and operating expenses by significantly reducing the amount of equipment required in the network. Such networks are currently entering the marketplace, and there is a desire in the OIF and other standards organizations to generalize their respective architectural models to include all-optical networks. This contribution is a proposal for initiating a new project in the OIF to address the specific features of all-optical networks as they relate to signaling for automatic provisioning and restoration of optical paths. Since an all-optical network naturally forms a domain, another important aspect of this project relates to the more general problem of establishing connections across multi-domain networks. Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 High-Level Reference Model for the Current UNI IP Router * Optical UNI (O-UNI) O-UNI WDM Pointto-Point Link Core O-E-O X-Connect with Full- or Sub-λ Granularity O-E-O WDM Tx/Rx Interfaces O-UNI * Can also be ATM switch, SONET/SDH multiplexer, etc. Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 All-Optical Network Reference Model 1* IP Router with Built-in Edge X-Connect Function Standard IP Router O-UNI O-E-O Edge X-Connect AO-UNI AO-UNI WDM Mux/DeMuxes & Tx/Rx Interfaces to the All-Optical Network Standard IP Router Configurable All-Optical Network “Cloud” O-UNI AO-UNI AO-UNI WDM Link All-Optical X-Connects or OADMs * Saleh, et al, OIF2000.278 Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 All-Optical Network Reference Model 2* IP Router NNI O-UNI OLI Proprietary WDM Signaling & Control OLI O-UNI Tx/Rx Interfaces to the All-Optical Network WDM Link Configurable All-Optical Network “Cloud” O-UNI O-UNI WDM Mux/DeMuxes (no Tx/Rx Interfaces) WDM Links All-Optical X-Connects * Drake, et al, OIF2000.254 and Chiu, et al, OIF2000.251 Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 Optical Bypass, Optical Reach and Regeneration An end-to-end optical path with regeneration & λ-conversion outside the O-E-O XC Layer (Intermediate “cost”) An end-to-end optical path with no regeneration or λ-conversion (Lowest “cost”) An end-to-end optical path with regeneration & λ-conversion within the O-E-O XC Layer (Higher “cost”) Another end-to-end optical path with regeneration and λ-conversion within the O-E-O XC Layer (Highest “cost”) Long-Reach Optics and Optical Bypass significantly reduce the needed number of WDM Tx/Rx Interfaces Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 Some Benefits of a Configurable All-Optical Layer • In addition to saving WDM Tx/Rx Interfaces because of optical bypass, as indicated in the previous slide, ... • A configurable All-Optical Layer, in effect, allows the sharing of cross-connect ports at the O-E-O layer, thus requiring smaller cross-connects, which enhances the scalability of the network • An All-Optical Layer can more naturally provide useful optical services like optical Multicasting and Waveband X-Connection Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001 Forming an All-Optical “Project” within the OIF ? • Agree on one or more suitable reference models for a configurable all-optical network layer, including: – Point-to-point links or rings with long-reach optics and configurable OADMs – All-optical mesh networks • Develop all-optical extensions to UNI 1.0 (e.g., AO-UNI, UNI 2.0 ?) – – – – – Formalizing signaling to/from an all-optical layer for connection setup, etc. Considering regeneration needs for paths longer than the optical reach Including non-SONET/SDH services, e.g., GbE, 10G-E, OCh, etc. Adding optical multicasting and waveband cross-connection applications Assuring that the all-optical aspects are not lost among other UNI 2.0 tasks • Consider hierarchical, two-tier networks, e.g., with the all-optical layer acting as an “express-highway” layer • Treat the all-optical cloud as a domain in a multi-domain network – Assuring that the all-optical multi-domain aspects are not lost Saleh, et al OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project January 31, 2001